Fractals and Surface Rroughness in EHL

  • F. M. Borodich
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 134)


Firstly, a brief introduction to fractals and similarity methods is given. Fractal models of rough surfaces are usually used when the spectral density function of surfaces has the power law character. It is argued that the main source for various misunderstandings in applications of fractals to mechanics is the lack of precise definitions and non-critical repetition of common statements about fractal geometry. Some key papers concerning fractal models of roughness and papers connecting EHL and fractals are reviewed. Two classes of fractal surfaces introduced by the author, namely the Cantor profile models and the parametric-homogeneous (PH) surfaces, are discussed. The well-known Weierstrass-Mandelbrot (W-M) profile is a particular case of PH-profiles. It is shown that only physical fractals (prefractals) should be attributed to real surfaces. It is argued that the Cantor profile is simple for analytical analysis. However, it has a minor drawback: all asperities of the profile have one-level character, while, as Archard showed, real roughness has a hierarchical structure. Finally, it is suggested to model rough surfaces by a multilevel prefractal model introduced by Borodich and Onishchenko.


roughness fractal parametric-homogeneous surfaces multilevel prefractal model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Lubrecht, A.A. and Venner, C.H. (1999) Elastohydrodynamic lubrication of rough surfaces. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. Part J. J. Eng. Trib., 213, 397–404.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Zhuravlev, V.A. (1940) On question of theoretical justification of the Amontons-Coulomb law for friction of unlubricated surfaces. Zh. Tekh. Fiz., 10, 1447–1452.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Greenwood, J.A. and Williamson, J.B.P. (1966) Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., A295, 300–319.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Archard, J.F. (1957) Elastic deformation and the laws of friction. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A243, 190–205.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Borodich, F.M. and Mosolov, A.B. (1992) Fractal roughness in contact problems. J. Appl. Math. Mech., 56, 786–795.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Whitehouse, D.J. and Archard, J.F. (1970) The properties of random surfaces of significance in their contact. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A316, 97–121.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Brown, S.R. (1995) Simple mathematical model of rough fracture. J. Geophys. Res., 100(B4), 5941–5952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Sayles, R.S. and Thomas, T.R. (1978) Surface topography as a nonstationary random process. Nature, 271, 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Berry, M.V. and Hannay, J.H. (1978) Topography of random surfaces. Nature, 273, 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Falconer, K.J. (1990) Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations an Applications, John Wiley, Chichester.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Vilenkin, N.Ya. (1968) Stories about Sets, Academic Press, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Mandelbrot, B.B. (1975) Les Objects Fractals: Forme, Hasard et Dimension, Flammarion, Paris.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Liu, S.H., Kaplan T. and Gray, L.J. (1986) Theory of the AC response of rough interfaces. In: Fractals in Physics, L. Pietronero and E. Tosatti (eds), North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 383–392.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Borodich, F.M. (1998) Parametric homogeneity and non-classical self-similarity. II. Some applications. Acta Mechanica, 131, 47–67.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Borodich, F.M. and Mosolov, A.B. (1991) Fractal contact of solids. Sov. Phys.-Tech. Phys., 61, 50–54.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Argatov, I.I. and Dmitriev, N.N. (2003) Fundamentals of Theory of Elastic Discrete Contact, Politekhnika Press, St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Borodich, F.M. and Onishchenko, D.A. (1993)Fractal roughness for problem of contact and friction (the simplest models). J. Frict. Wear, 14, 14–19.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Borodich, F.M. and Onishchenko, D.A. (1999) Similarity and fractality in the modelling of roughness by multilevel profile with hierarchical structure. Int. J. Solids Struct., 36, 2585–2612.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Warren, T.L. and Krajcinovic, D. (1996) Random Cantor set models for the elastic perfectly plastic contact of rough surfaces. Wear, 196, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Plesha, M.E. and Ni, D. (2001) Scaling of geological discontinuity normal load-deformation response using fractal geometry. Int. J. Num. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 25, 741–756.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Warren, T.L., Majumdar, A. and Krajcinovic, D. (1996) A fractal model for the rigid-perfectly plastic contact of rough surfaces. J. Appl. Mech., 63, 47–54.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Schmittbuhl, J., Vilotte, J.-P. and Roux, S. (1996) Velocity weakening friction: A renormalization approach. J. Geophys. Res., 101(B6), 13911–13917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Sugimura, J. (1995) Fractal surfaces and hydrodynamic lubrication. J. Japan Soc. Trib., 40, 549–554 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Kennedy, F.E., Brown, C.A., Kolodny, J. and Sheldon, B.M. (1999) Fractal analysis of hard disk surface roughness and correlation with static and lowspeed friction. Trans. ASME J. Tribology, 121, 968–974.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Jhon, M.S. and Choi, H.J. (2001) Lubricants in future data storage technology. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 7, 263–275.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Plouraboue, F., Prat, M. and Letalleur, N. (2001) Sliding lubricated anisotropic rough surfaces. Phys. Rev. E, 64, Art. No. 011202.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Whitehouse, D.J. (2001) Fractal of fiction. Wear, 249, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Greenwood, J.A. and Wu, J.J. (2001) Surface roughness and contact: An apology. Meccanica, 36, 617–630.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Bhushan, B. (2001) Modern Tribology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, p. 1430.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Borodich, F.M. (1999) Fractals and fractal scaling in fracture mechanics. Int. J. Fracture, 95, 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Davies, S. and Hall, P. (1999) Fractal analysis of surface roughness by using spatial data. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 61, 3–37.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Borodich, F.M. (1993) Similarity properties of discrete contact between a fractal punch and an elastic medium. C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris), Ser. 2, 316, 281–286.MATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Berry, M.V. and Lewis, Z.V. (1980) On the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot fractal functions. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A370, 459–484.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Roques-Carmes, C., Wehbi, D., Quiniou, J.F. and Tricot, C. (1988) Modelling engineering surfaces and evaluating their non-integer dimension for application in material science. Surface Topography, 1, 435–443.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Sun, X. and Jaggard, D.L. (1990) Wave scattering from non-random fractal surfaces. Optics Communications, 78, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Majumdar, A. and Bhushan, B. (1990) Role of fractal geometry in roughness characterization and contact mechanics of surfaces. J. Tribology, 112, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Moreira, J.G., Kamphorst Leal da Silva, J. and Oliffson Kamphorst, S. (1994) On the fractal dimension of self-affine profiles. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 27, 8079–8089.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Lopez, J., Hansali, G., Zahouani, Le Bosse, J.C. and Mathia, T. (1995) 3-D fractal-based characterization for engineered surface topography. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufacture, 35, 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Blackmore, D. and Zhou, J.G. (1996) A general fractal distribution function for rough surface profiles. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 56, 1694–1719.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Bhushan, B. (1995) A fractal theory of the temperature distribution at elastic contacts of fast sliding surfaces. Discussion. J. Tribology, 117, 214–215.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Malcai, O., Lidar, D.A., Biham, O. and Avnir, D., (1997) Scaling range and cutoffs in empirical fractals. Phys. Rev. E, 56, 2817–2828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Mandelbrot, B.B. (1985) Self-affine fractals and fractal dimension. Phys. Scripta., 32, 257–260.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Hansen, A., Hinrichsen, E.L. and Roux, S. (1991) Roughness of crack interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, 2476–2479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Måløy, K.J., Hansen, A., Hinrichsen, E.L. and Roux, S. (1992) Experimental measurements of the roughness of brittle cracks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 2266–2269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. M. Borodich
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations