Impact of road traffic on breeding bird populations

  • R. Reijnen
  • R. Foppen

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams LW, Geis, AD. 1981; Effects of highways on wildlife. Report No. FHWA/RD-81/067, Office of Research, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Administration, Washington.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson P. 1994; Road and nature conservation; guidance on impacts, mitigation and enhancement. English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough, England.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett AF. 1991; Roads, roadsides and wildlife conservation: a review. In: Saunders DA & Hobbs RJ (eds) Nature conservation 2; the role of corridors, 99-117. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Bergen F, Abs M. 1997; Etho-ecological study of the singing activity of the Blue Tit (Parus caeruleus), Great Tit (Parus major ) and Chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs). Journal für Ornithologie 138: 451-467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergmann H.-H. 1993; Der Buchfink: neues über einen bekannten Sänger, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  6. Brumm H. 2004; The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. Journal of Animal Ecology 73: 434-440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark WD, Karr JR 1979; Effects of highways on Red-winged Blackbird and Horned Lark populations. Wilson Bulletin 81: 143-145.Google Scholar
  8. Cuperus R. 2005; Ecological compensation of high impacts: negotiated trade-off or no-net-loss? Ph.D. thesis, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. Ellenberg H, Müller K, Stottele T. 1981; Strassen-Ökologie. Broschürenreihe der Deutschen Strassenliga, Bonn.Google Scholar
  10. Erritzoe J, Mazgajki TD, Rejt L., . 2004; Bird casualties on European roads- a review. Acta Ornithologica 38: 77-93.Google Scholar
  11. Fernández-Juricic E. 1999; Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conservation Biology 14: 513-521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferris CR. 1979; Effects of Interstate 95 on breeding birds in northern Maine. Journal of Wildlife Management 43: 421-427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Findley CS, Bourdages J. 2000; Response time of wetland biodiversity to road construction on adjacent lands. Conservation Biology 14: 86-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foppen R, Chardon JP, Liefveld W. 2001; Understanding the role of sink patches in source-sink metapopulations: Reed Warbler in an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology 14: 1881-1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foppen R, Reijnen R. 1994; The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. II. Breeding dispersal of male willow warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus) in relation to the proximity of a highway. Journal of Applied Ecology 31: 95-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foppen R, van Kleunen A, Loos W.-B, Nienhuis J, Sierdsema H. 2002; Broedvogels en de invloed van hoofdwegen, een national perspectief. Onderzoeksrapport nr 2002/08, SOVON Vogelonderzoek Nederland, Dienst Weg- en Waterbouwkunde, Delft.Google Scholar
  17. Forman RTT. 2000; Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United States. Conservation Biology 14: 31-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forman RTT, Reineking B, Hersperger AM. 2002; Road traffic and nearby grassland bird patterns in a suburbanizing landscape. Environmental Management 29: 782-800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forman RTT et al. 2003; Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  20. Fretwell. 1972; Populations in a seasonal environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  21. Füllhaas U, Klemp C, Kordes A, Ottersberg H, Pirmann M, Thiessen A, Tschoetschel C, Zucchi H. 1989; Unterschuchungen zum Strassentod von Vögeln, Säugetieren, Amphibien und Reptilien. Beiträge zur Naturkunde Niedersachens 42: 129-147.Google Scholar
  22. Glas P. 1962; Factors governing density in the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) in different types of wood Archives Neerlandaises de Zoologie 13: 466-472.Google Scholar
  23. Green RE, Tyler GA, Bowden CGR. 2000; Habitat selection, ranging behaviour and diet of the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus) in southern England. Journal of Zoology 250: 161-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helb H.-W, Hüppop O. 1991; Herzschlagrate als Mass zur Beurteilung des Einflusses von Störungen bei Vögeln. Ornithologenkalender 1992. Aula Verlag, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  25. Helldin JO, Seiler A. 2003; Effects of roads on the abundance of birds in Swedish forest and farmland. In: IENE Conference 2003 Proceedings. Infra Eco Network Europe, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  26. Hill D. 1992; The impact of noise and artificial light on waterfowl behaviour: a review and synthesis of available literature. British Trust for Ornithology. Tring, UK.Google Scholar
  27. Hill D, Hockin D, Price D, Tucker G, Morris R, Treweek J. 1997; Bird disturbance: improving the quality and utility of disturbance research. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 275-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hodson NL, Snow DW. 1965; The road deaths enquiry, 1960-1961. Bird Study 12: 90-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horne B van. 1983; Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 893-901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Howe RW, Davies GJ, Mosca V.1991; The demographic significance of ‘sink’ populations. Biological Conservation 57: 239-255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Illner H. 1992a; Effects of roads with heavy traffic on grey partridge (Perdix perdix) density. Gibier Faune Sauvage 9: 467-480.Google Scholar
  32. Illner H. 1992b; Road deaths of Westphalian owls: methodological problems, influence of road type and possible effects on population levels. In: Galbraith CA, Taylor IR & Percival S (eds) The ecology and conservation of European owls, 94-100. UK Nature Conservation 5, Peterborough.Google Scholar
  33. Job RS. 1996; The influence of subjective reactions to noise on health effects of the noise. Environmental International 22: 93-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Joveniaux A. 1985; Influence de la misé en service d'une autoroute sur la faune sauvage. In: Bernard J-M, Lansiart M, Kempf C & Tille M. (eds) Actes du colloque Routes et Faune Sauvage, 211-228. SETRS, Colmar.Google Scholar
  35. Klump GM. 2001; Die Wirkung von Lärm auf die auditorische Wahrnehmung der Vögel. Abgewandte Landschaftsökologie H. 44: 9-23.Google Scholar
  36. Kluyver HN, Tinbergen L.1953; Territory and the regulation of density in titmice. Archives Neerlandaises de Zoologie10: 265-289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuitunen M, Rossi E, Stenroos A. 1998; Do highways influence density of land birds. Environmental Management 22: 297-302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuitunen MT, Viljanen J, Rossi E, Stenroos A. 2003; Impact of busy roads on breeding success in pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Environmental Management 31: 79-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lowell LG, Best LB, Prather M. 1977; Lead in urban and rural song birds. Environmental Pollution 12: 235-238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Madhusan K, Warren PS. 2004; Tits, noise and urban bioacoustics. Trends un Ecology and Evolution 19: 109-110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCullagh P, and Nelder JA. 1989; Generalized Linear Models, second edition. Chapman and Hall. London.Google Scholar
  42. Milsom TP, Langton SD, Parkin WK, Peel S, Bishop JD, Hart JD, Moore NP. 2000; Habitat models of bird species' distribution: an aid to the management of coastal grazing marshes. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 706-727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Molenaar JG de, Jonkers DA, Sanders ME. 2000; Wegverlichting en natuur. III Lokale invloed van weg verlichting op een gruttopopulatie. DWW Ontsnipperingsreeks 38, Delft.Google Scholar
  44. Mumme RL, Schoech SJ, Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW. 2000; Life and death in the fast lane: demographic consequences of road mortality in the Florida Scrub-Jay. Conservation Biology 14: 501-512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O'Connor RJ, Fuller RJ. 1985: Bird population responses to habitat. In: Taylor K, Fuller RJ & Lack PC (eds), Bird census and atlas studies.197-211. British Trust for Ornithology. Tring.Google Scholar
  46. Peris SJ, Pescador M. 2004; Effects of traffic noise in passerine populations in Mediterranean wooded pastures. Applied Acoustics 65: 357-366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramsden D. J. 2003; Barn Owls and major roads: results and recommendations from a 15-year research project. The Barn Owl Trust, Ashburton.Google Scholar
  48. Räty M. 1979; Effect of highway traffic on tetraonid densities. Ornis Fennica 56: 169-170.Google Scholar
  49. Reijnen R, Foppen R. 1994; The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. I. Evidence of reduced habitat quality for willow warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus) breeding close to a highway. Journal of Applied Ecology 31: 85-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reijnen R, Foppen R, ter Braak C, Thissen J. 1995; The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. III. Reduction of density in relation to the proximity of main roads. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 187-202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reijnen R, Foppen R. 1995; The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. IV. Influence of population size on the reduction of density of woodland breeding birds. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 481-491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reijnen R, Foppen R, Meeuwsen H. 1996; The effects of traffic on the density of breeding birds in Dutch agricultural grasslands. Biological Conservation 75: 255-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reijnen R, Foppen R, Veenbaas G. 1997; Disturbance by traffic as a threat to breeding birds: evaluation of the effect and considerations in planning en managing road corridors. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 567-581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reijnen R, Foppen R, Veenbaas G, Bussink H. 2002; Disturbance by traffic as a threat to breeding birds: evaluation of the effect and considerations in planning en managing road corridors. In: Sherwood B, Cutler D &. Burton JA (eds.) Wildlife and Roads, the ecological impact, 249-267. Imperial College Press, London.Google Scholar
  55. Reijnen R, Veenbaas G, Foppen RPB. 1995; Predicting the effects of motorway traffic on breeding bird populations. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Road and Hydraulic Engineering Division, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  56. Rheindt FE. 2003; The impact of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? Journal für Ornithologie 144: 295-306.Google Scholar
  57. Sandberg U. 1991; Abatement of traffic, vehicle and tire/road noise - the global perspective. Noise Control Engineering Journal. 49: 170-181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slabbekoorn H, Peet M. 2003; Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spellerberg IF. 2002; Ecological effects of roads. Science Publishers, Inc. Enfield, USA.Google Scholar
  60. Stansfeld SA, Sharp DS, Gallacher J, Babisch W.1993; Road traffic noise, noise sensitivity and psychological disorder. Psychological Medicine 23: 977-985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stone E. 2000; Separating the noise from the noise: A finding in support of the “Niche Hypothesis”, that birds are influenced by human-induced noise in natural habitats. Anthrozoos 13: 225-231.Google Scholar
  62. Tulp I, Reijnen MJSM(R.), ter Braak CJF, Waterman E, Bergers PJM, Dirksen S, Snep RPH, Nieuwenhuizen W. 2002; Effect van treinverkeer op de dichtheden van weidevogels. Rapport nr. 02-34, Bureau Waardenburg, Culemborg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  63. Weiserbs A, Jacob J.-P. 2001 ; Le bruit engender par le traffic autoroutier-influence-t-il la repartition des oiseaux nicheurs? 2001. Alauda 69: 483-489.Google Scholar
  64. Zande AN, van der, ter Keurs WJ, van der Weijden WJ. 1980; The impact of roads on the densities of four bird species in an open field habitat - evidence of a long-distance effect. Biological Conservation 18: 299-321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Reijnen
    • 1
  • R. Foppen
    • 2
  1. 1.AlterraWageningen University and Research CentreNetherlands
  2. 2.Dutch Centre for Field OrnithologyNetherlands

Personalised recommendations