Rotifera X pp 415-421 | Cite as

Relationships between rotifers, phytoplankton and bacterioplankton in the Corumbá reservoir, Goiás State, Brazil

  • Cláudia Costa Bonecker
  • Anderson Setsuo Miyashiro Aoyagui
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 181)

Abstract

This study evaluates the relationships between rotifers and phytoplankton and rotifers and bacterioplankton in a tropical reservoir. Fourteen stations in the reservoir were sampled, including in its arms and tributaries, in the dry and rainy seasons. The highest rotifer density was found in the dry season, mainly in the upper and intermediary stretches of the reservoir. Brachionus calyciflorus, Polyarthra vulgaris, Keratella tropica, K. cochlearis, K. americana and Pompholyx complanata were the most abundant species. Densities of B. calyciflorus and bacteria were significantly correlated. On the other hand, there was an inverse relationship between P. vulgaris and bacteria. Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) were observed to be associated to K. americana. We suggest that the rotifer populations play a part in microbial and herbivory food webs.

Key words

Brazil bacterioplankton phytoplankton reservoir rotifers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allan, J. D., 1976. Life history patterns in zooplankton. American Naturalist 110: 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arndt, H., 1993. Rotifers as predators on components of the microbial web bacteria, heterotrophic flagellates, ciliates — a review. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arruda, J. A., G. R. Marzolf & R. T. Faulk, 1983. The role of suspended sediments in the nutrition of zooplankton in turbid reservoir. Ecology 64: 1225–1235.Google Scholar
  4. Bogdan, G. & J. J. Gilbert, 1982. Seasonal patterns of feeds by natural populations of Keratella, Polyarthra and Bosmina: clearance rates, selectivities, and contribution to community graze. Limnology and Oceanography 27: 918–934.Google Scholar
  5. Booth, B. C., 1993. Estimating cell concentration and biomass of autotrophic plankton using microscopy. In Kemp, P. F. B. F. Sherr, & J. J. Cole (eds), Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology. Boca Raton, Florida, 199–205.Google Scholar
  6. Branco, C. W. C. & P. A. C. Senna, 1996. Relations among heterotrophic bacteria, chlorophyll-a, total phytoplankton, total zooplankton and physical and chemical features in the Paranoá Reservoir, Brasília, Brazil. Hydrobiologia 337: 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caleffi, S., 1998. Guarapiranga Reservoir: study of the zooplankton community and aspects of its eutrophication. Internationale Vereinigung für Theoritische und Angewandte Limnologie, Verhandlungen 26: 1898–1903.Google Scholar
  8. Cisneiros, R., E. Hooker & L. E. Velasquez, 1991. Natural diet of herbivorous zooplankton in lake Xolotlán (Managua). Hydrobiological Bulletin 25: 163–167.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, J. J. & K. G. Bogdan, 1984. Rotifer grazing: in situ studies on selectivity and rates. In Meyers, D. G. & J. R. Strickler (eds), Trophic Interactions Within Aquatic Ecosystems. AAAS Selected Symposium 85: 97–133.Google Scholar
  10. Guimarães-Landa, G. & L. R. Mourgués-Schurter, 1999. Composição e abundância do zooplâncton em um sistema artificial raso (Represa Pomar) no Campus da Universidade Federal de Lavras — Minas Gerais. Bios 7: 21–31.Google Scholar
  11. Hobbie, J. E., R. Daley & S. Jasper, 1977. Use of nucleopore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 33: 1225–1228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Infante, A., 1978. Untersuchungen über die Ausnutzbarkeit verschiedener Algen durch das Zooplankton. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 42: 340–405.Google Scholar
  13. Koste, W., 1978. Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas begründet von Max Voight. Monogononta, 2 vols. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, 673 pp, 474 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Mazumder A., D. R. S. Lean & W. D. Taylor, 1992. Dominance of small filter feeding zooplankton in the lake Ontario foodweb. Journal of Great Lakes Research 3: 456–466.Google Scholar
  15. Nogueira, M. G., R. Henry & F. E. Maricatto, 1999. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the Jurumirim Reservoir, São Paulo, Brazil. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management 4: 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ooms-Wilms, A. L., 1997. Are bacteria na important food source for rotifers in eutrophic lake? Journal of Plankton Research 19: 1125–1141.Google Scholar
  17. Porter, K. & Y. S. Feig, 1980. The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnology and Oceanography 25: 943–948.Google Scholar
  18. Sanders, R. W., K. G. Porter, S. J. Bennet & A. E. De Biase, 1989. Seasonal patterns of bactivory by flagellates, ciliates, rotifers and cladocerans in a freshwater planktonic community. Limnology and Oceanography 34:673–687.Google Scholar
  19. Schmid-Araya, J. M. & R. L. Zuñiga, 1992. Zooplankton community structure in two Chilean reservoirs. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 123: 305–335.Google Scholar
  20. Segers, H., 1995. Rotifera. The Lecanidae (Monogononta). Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world, 2. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague 226 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Starkweather, P. L., J. J. Gilbert & T. M. Frost, 1979. Bacterial feeding by the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus: clearance and ingestion rates, behavior and population dynamics. Oecologia 44: 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Uthermöhl, H., 1958. Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen phytoplankton-methodic. Internationale Vereinigung fuer Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie, Mitteilungen 9: 1–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cláudia Costa Bonecker
    • 1
  • Anderson Setsuo Miyashiro Aoyagui
    • 1
  1. 1.Nupélia, Posgraduate Course in Ecology of Continental Aquatic EnvironmentsState University of MaringáMaringá-PRBrazil

Personalised recommendations