ERGATIVITY pp 315-335 | Cite as

Ergativity in Austronesian Languages

  • ILEANA PAUL
  • LISA TRAVIS
Part of the Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory book series (SNLT, volume 65)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldridge, Edith. (2004). Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. PhD thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  2. Anand, Pranav and Andrew Nevins. (this volume). ‘The locus of ergative case assignment: Evidence from scope.’Google Scholar
  3. Arka, I Wayan and Christopher Manning. 1998. ‘Voice and grammatical relations in Indonesian: A new perspective.’ In Proceedings of the 1998 International Lexical Functional Grammar Conference.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, Sarah. 1979. Cebuano Subjects in Two Frameworks. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
  5. Bittner, Maria. 1994. Case, Scope, and Binding. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bittner, Maria and Kenneth Hale. 1996. ‘Ergativity: Towards a theory of a heterogeneous class.’ Linguistic Inquiry 27, 531-604.Google Scholar
  7. Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1993. ‘Ergativity and ergative unergatives.’ In Colin Phillips, ed., Papers on Case and Agreement II: MIT working Papers in Linguistics, 45-88.Google Scholar
  8. Campana, Mark. 1992. A Movement Theory of Ergativity. PhD thesis, McGill University.Google Scholar
  9. Cena, R. 1979. ‘Tagalog counterexamples to the accessibility hierarchy.’ Studies in Philippine Linguistics 31, 119-124.Google Scholar
  10. Chung, Sandra. 1976. ‘On the subject of two passives in Indonesian.’ In C. Li, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon. 1998. ‘Subject and nonsubject relativization in Indonesian.’ Paper presented at the Second Symposium on Malay/Indonesian, Ujung Pandang.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, Grace. 1970. Two Views of Kalagan Grammar. PhD thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  13. De Guzman, Videa. 1988. ‘Ergative analysis for Philippine languages: An analysis.’ In Richard McGinn, ed., Studies in Austronesian Linguistics. Ohio University.Google Scholar
  14. Dell, François. 1983. ‘An aspectual distinction in Tagalog.’ Oceanic Linguistics. 22-23 175-206.Google Scholar
  15. Dixon, Robert. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gerdts, Donna. 1988. ‘Antipassives and causatives in Ilokano: Evidence for an ergative analysis.’ In Richard McGinn, ed., Studies in Austronesian Linguistics. Ohio University.Google Scholar
  17. Guilfoyle, Eithne, Henrietta Hung and Lisa Travis. 1992. ‘Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 375-414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johns, Alana. 1992. ‘Deriving ergativity.’ Linguistic Inquiry 23, 57-87.Google Scholar
  19. Keenan, Edward L. 1976. ‘Remarkable subjects in Malagasy.’ In Charles Li, ed., Subject and Topic, 249-301. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Keenan, Edward L. 2000. ‘Morphology is structure. ‘ In Ileana Paul, Vivianne Phillips and Lisa Travis, eds., Formal Issues in Austronesian Linguistics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Keenan, Edward L. and Cecile Manorohanta. 2001. ‘A quantitative study of voice in Malagasy.’ Oceanic Linguistics 40, 67-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kroeger, Paul. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
  23. Legate, Julie. 2002. Walpiri: Theoretical implications. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
  24. Legate, Julie. (this volume). ‘Split absolutive.’Google Scholar
  25. Lasnik, Howard and Tim Stowell. 1991. ‘Weakest cross-over.’ Linguistic Inquiry 22, 687-720.Google Scholar
  26. Maclachlan, Anna. 1996. Aspects of Ergativity in Tagalog. PhD thesis, McGill University.Google Scholar
  27. Maclachlan, Anna and Masanori Nakamura. 1997. ‘Case checking and specificity in Tagalog.’ The Linguistic Review 14, 307-333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahajan, Anoop. 1990. The A/A-bar distinction and Movement Theory. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
  29. Manning, Christopher. 1996. Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Massam, Diane. (this volume). ‘Neither absolutive nor ergative is nominative or accusative: Arguments from Niuean.’Google Scholar
  31. Mirto, Ignazio. 1993. ‘Ergativity in Malagasy.’ In Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 73-95. Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  32. Mulder, Jean and Arthur Schwartz. 1981. ‘On the subject of advancements in Philippine languages.’ Studies in Language 5, 227-268.Google Scholar
  33. Pearson, Matt. 2001. The Clause Structure of Malagasy: A Minimalist Approach. PhD thesis, UCLA.Google Scholar
  34. Richards, Norvin. 2000. ‘Another look at Tagalog subjects.’ In Ileana Paul, Vivianne Phillips and Lisa Travis, eds., Formal Issues in Austronesian Linguistics, 105-116. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. ‘On Icelandic word order one more.’ In Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen, eds., Syntax and Semantics 24: Modern Icelandic Syntax, 3-38. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schachter, Paul. 1976. ‘The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above?’ In Charles N. Li, ed., Subject and Topic, 491-518. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Schachter, Paul. 1996. ‘The subject in Tagalog: Still none of the above.’ UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15, 1-61.Google Scholar
  38. Sells, Peter. 2000. ‘Raising and the order of clausal constituents in the Philippine languages.’ In Ileana Paul, Vivianne Phillips and Lisa Travis, eds., Formal Issues in Austronesian Linguistics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Travis, Lisa. 2001. ‘Derived objects in Malagasy.’ In William Davies and Stanley Dubinsky, eds., Objects and Other Subjects, pp. 123-156. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  40. Ura, Hiroyuki. (this volume). ‘A parametric syntax of aspectually conditioned split-ergativity.’Google Scholar
  41. Woolford, Ellen. 1997. ‘Four-way case systems: Ergative, nominative, objective and accusative.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15.181-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • ILEANA PAUL
  • LISA TRAVIS

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations