Liver Perfusion using Level Set Methods

  • Sebastian Nowozin
  • Lixu Gu
Conference paper

Abstract

The family of Level Set Methods has been successfully used by scientists and practitioners for medical image processing. Image segmentation using active implicit contours is applied in 2D and 3D medical imaging, with the most popular methods being the Fast Marching Method and the Narrow band Level Set Method.

In this paper we apply level set segmentation to aid in automating the clinical challenge of measuring the contrast agent concentration in liver perfusion time series. For this, we apply implicit contour methods to time series of two-dimensional MRI images to yield accurate measurements of local image properties located relative to the shape of the liver across all images in the series.

Our results show that Level Set Methods can be used to provide the necessary segmentation shape data to reliably measure local image intensities positioned relative to this shape throughout a time series, where the location and shape of the object to be tracked changes.

Keywords

Segmentation Result Seed Point Distance Vector Liver Perfusion Speed Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adalsteinsson, D., & Sethian, J. 1995. A Fast Level Set Method for Propagating Interfaces.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ho, Sean, Bullitt, Elizabeth, & Gerig, Guido. 2001 (11). Level Set Evolution with Region Competition: Automatic 3-D Segmentation of Brain Tumors. Tech. rept. TR01-036.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malladi, R., & Sethian, J. A. 1995. Image Processing via Level Set Curvature Flow. Proc. Natl. Acad. of Sci., 92(15), 7046–7050.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malladi, R., & Sethian, J. A. 1996. An O(N log N) algorithm for shape modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93 (Sept. 25), 9389–9392.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osher, Stanley, & Fedkiw, Ronald. 2003. Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. Springer.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Osher, Stanley, & Sethian, James A. 1988. Fronts Propagating with Curvature-Dependent Speed: Algorithms Based on Hamilton-Jacobi Formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79, 12–49.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sethian, J. 1998. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suri, J., Liu, K., Singh, S., Laxminarayana, S., & Reden, L. 2001a. Shape Recovery Algorithms Using Level Sets in 2-D/3-D Medical Imagery: A State-of-the-Art Review.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suri, J.S. 2000. Leaking prevention in fast level sets using fuzzy models: an application in MR brain. IEEE EMBS International Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, 2000. Proceedings, 220–225.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suri, J.S., Setarehdan, S.K., & Singh, S. 2001b. Advanced Algorithmic Approaches to Medical Image Segmentation: State-of-the-Art Applications in Cardiology, Neurology, Mammography and Pathology. Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Nowozin
    • 1
  • Lixu Gu
    • 1
  1. 1.Digital Medical Image Processing and Image Guided Surgery LaboratoryShanghai Jiaotong UniversityChina

Personalised recommendations