The Psychology of Massively Multi-User Online Role-Playing Games: Motivations, Emotional Investment, Relationships and Problematic Usage

  • Nick Yee
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW, volume 34)


Video Game Virtual Environment Virtual World Romantic Partner Material World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Woodcock, B. (2003). An Analysis of MMOG Subscription Growth. Available at Scholar
  2. 2., MMOG Roundup: Depressing 2004 Edition. (2004). Available at,6286Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailenson, J.N. & Blascovich, J. (2002). Mutual gaze and task performance in shared virtual environments. Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 13: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leigh, J., DeFanti, T., Johnson, A., Brown, M., & Sandin, D. (1997). Global telemersion: Better than being there. In Proceedings of ICAT’ 97, no pp.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mania, K. & Chalmers, A. (1998). A classification for user embodiment in collaborative virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia. IOS Press-Ohmsha, Ltd., pp. 177–182.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Normand, V., Babski, C., Benford, S., Bullock, A., Carion, S., Chrysanthou, Y., Farcet, N., Harvey, J., Kuijpers, N., Magneat-Thalmann, Raupp-Musse, S., Rodden, T., Slater, M., & Smith, G. (1999). The COVEN project: Exploring applicative, technical, and usage dimensions of collaborative virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8: 218–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Usoh, M., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Small group behavior in a virtual and real environment: A comparative study. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9: 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, X. & Furnas, G.W. (2002). Social interactions in multiscale CVEs. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments 2002, Bonn, Germany, September 30–October 2, pp. 31–38.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bartle, R. (1990). Early MUD history. Available at Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koster, R. (2002). Online world timeline. Available at Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dibbel, J. (1993). A rape in cyberspace. Village Voice, Vol. XXXVIII, No. 51, December 21.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakamura, L., Rodman, G., & Kolko, B. (2000). Race in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson, C.A. & Bushman, B.J. (1997). External validity of “trivial” experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology, 1(1): 19–41.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bushman, B.J. & Anderson, C.A. (2002). Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12):1679–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anderson, C.A. & Dill, K.E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78(4):772–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anderson, C.A. & Bushman, B.J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12(5):353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ballard, M.E. & Lineberger, R. (1999). Video game violence and confederate gender: Effects on reward and punishment given by college males. Sex Roles, 41(7–8): 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Funk, J.B. & Buchman, D.D. (1996). Playing violent video and computer games and adolescent self-concept. Journal of Communication, 46(2): 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Funk, J.B., Hagan, J.D., Schimming, J.L., Bullock, W., Buchman, D.D., & Myers, M. (2002). Aggression and psychopathology in adolescents with a preference for violent electronic games. Aggressive Behavior, 28(2): 134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Griffiths, M. (1999). Violent video games and aggression: A review of the literature. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 4(2): 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scott, D. (1995). The effect of video games on feelings of aggression. Journal of Psychology, 129(2): 121–132.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ferguson, C.J. (2002). Media violence: Miscast causality. American Psychologist, 57(6–7):446–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Castronova, E. (2002). Virtual worlds: A first-hand account of market and society on the cyberian frontier. Available at Scholar
  25. 25.
    Castronova, E. (2002). The price of “man” and “woman”: A hedonic pricing model of avatar attributes in a synthetic world. Available at Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lastowka, G. & Hunter, D. The laws of virtual worlds. (2003). Available at Scholar
  27. 27.
    Griffiths, M. (2003). Breaking the stereotype: The case of on-line gaming. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 6: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yee, N. (2004). The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gosling, S.D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O.P. (2004). Shouldwe trustweb-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2): 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bailenson, J.N., Shum, M.S., Atran, S., Medin, D.L., & Coley, J.C. (2002). A bird’s eye view: Triangulating biological categorization and reasoning within and across cultures. Cognition, 84: 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yee, N. (2004). The Daedalus project. Available at Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bartle, R. (2003). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Available at Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cassell, J. & H. Jenkins (Eds.). (1998). From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1): 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yee, N. (2003). Inside out. Available at Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yee, N. (2003). Engineering relationships. Available at Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yee, N. (2002). Ariadne: Understanding MMORPG addiction. Available at Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yee, N. (2001). The Virtual Skinner Box. Available at Scholar
  39. 39.
    Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A., Swinth, K., Hoyt, C., & Bailenson, J.N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13(2): 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bailenson, J.N., Beall, A., Loomis, J., Blascovich, J., & Turk, M. (2004). Transformed social interaction: Decoupling representation from behavior and formin collaborative virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13(4), 428–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hayles, K. (1999). How we became Posthuman: Virtual bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gerbner, G. (1973). Communications Technology and Social Policy: Understanding the New Cultural Revolution. New York: Interscience Publication.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dibbell, J. (2003). The unreal estate boom. Wired, 11(01).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    The Walrus. (2004). Game theories. Available at Scholar
  45. 45.
    Andrejevic, M. (2002). The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2): 230–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Yee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CommunicationStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations