Superiority in Value

  • G. Arrhenius
Part of the Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy book series (LOET, volume 17)


High Welfare Pleasurable Experience Aggregate Welfare Repugnant Conclusion Welfare Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arrhenius, G. & Rabinowicz, W. “On Millian Discontinuities”, mimeo, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. Arrhenius, G. Future Generations: A Challenge for Moral Theory, F.D.-Diss., Uppsala: University Printers, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. Brentano, F. “Loving and Hating” in Chisholm, R. M. (ed.) The Origin of Our Knowledge of Right and Wrong, New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969 [1907].Google Scholar
  4. Broad, C. D. Five Types of Ethical Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979 [1930].Google Scholar
  5. Crisp, R. Ideal Utilitarianism: Theory and Practice, D.Phil. Diss., University of Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. —. “Utilitarianism and the Life of Virtue”, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 167, pp. 139–60, April 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, R. B. Pleasures and Pains: A Theory of Qualitative Hedonism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. Glover, J. Causing Death and Saving Lives, London: Penguin Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  9. Griffin, J. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  10. Hutcheson, F. A System of Moral Philosophy, Vol. 1, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1968 [1755].Google Scholar
  11. Klint Jensen, K. Om afvejning af værdier, Ph.D. Diss., University of Copenhagen, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. Lemos, N. M. “Higher Goods and the Myth of Tithonus”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 90, Issue 9, September 1993.Google Scholar
  13. McTaggart, J. M. E. The Nature of Existence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1927.Google Scholar
  14. Mill, J. S. Utilitarianism, ed. Roger Crisp, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. Narveson, J. “Utilitarianism and New Generations”, Mind 76, pp. 62–72, Jan 1967.Google Scholar
  16. Newman, J. H. Certain Difficulties Felt by Anglicans in Catholic Teaching, vol. I, London: Longmans and Green, 1885.Google Scholar
  17. Parfit, D. Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  18. —. “Overpopulation and the Quality of Life”, pp. 145–64 in P. Singer (ed.), Applied Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  19. Portmore, D. W. “Does the Total Principle Have Any Repugnant Implications?”, Ratio vol. xii, March 1999.Google Scholar
  20. Rabinowicz, W. “Ryberg’s Doubts About Higher and Lower Pleasures — Put to Rest?”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6, pp. 231–7, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rashdall, H. The Theory of Good and Evil: A Treatise on Moral Philosophy, vol. 1, 2nd ed., 1907.Google Scholar
  22. Riley, J. “On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure”, Utilitas 5, pp. 291–300, 1993.Google Scholar
  23. —. “Is Qualitative Hedonism Incoherent?”, Utilitas 11, pp. 34–60, 1999.Google Scholar
  24. Ross, W. D., The Right and the Good, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1930.Google Scholar
  25. Ryberg, J. “Higher and Lower Pleasures — Doubts on Justification”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5, pp. 415–29.Google Scholar
  26. Sidgwick, H. The Methods of Ethics, 7th edn., London: Macmillan, 1967 [1907].Google Scholar
  27. Skorupski, J. Ethical Explorations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Arrhenius

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations