Teaching and Learning with Analogies
As we have illustrated in this chapter, on balance analogies are a friend to teachers and students alike but as we emphasise, analogies can be double-edged swords. In order that analogies are used as an effective tool in a science teacher’s repertoire, knowledge about their pedagogical function is essential.
the suitability of the analog to the target for the student audience and the extent of teacher-directed or student-generated mapping needed to understand the target concept;
an understanding that an analogy does not provide learners with all facets of the target concept and that multiple analogies can better achieve this goal;
an appreciation that not all learners are comfortable with multiple analogies because the epistemological orientation of some is to expect a single explanation for a phenomenon.
Additional understanding of how analogies can be optimally used in class can be derived from the history of scientific discovery and from accounts of the ways experienced science teachers use analogies. We do not wish to claim that analogies used in science classrooms will necessarily improve both science teaching and learning. Still, research has compellingly demonstrated that, when used effectively, analogies are a valuable pedagogical tool in teachers’ repertoires and this enhancement of practice is our aim in writing this chapter.
KeywordsScience Teaching Science Teacher Alternative Conception Target Concept Series Circuit
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Atkins, P. (1995). The periodic kingdom. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
- Bronowski, J. (1973). The ascent of man. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
- Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Champagne, A. B., Gunstone, R. F., & Klopfer, L. E. (1985). Effecting changes in cognitive structures among physics students. In L. H. T. West, & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 163–188). Orlando, FA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cosgrove, M. (1995). A case study of science-in-the-making as students generate an analogy for electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 295–310.Google Scholar
- Dagher, Z. R. (1995a). Does the use of analogies contribute to conceptual change? Science Education, 78, 601–614.Google Scholar
- Dagher, Z. R. (1995b). Analysis of analogies used by teachers. Journal of Research in Science Education, 32, 259–270.Google Scholar
- Dupin, J. J., & Johsua, S. (1989). Analogies and “modelling analogies” in teaching. Some examples in basic electricity. Science Education, 73, 207–224.Google Scholar
- Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75, 649–672.Google Scholar
- Feynman, R. P. (1994). Six easy pieces. Reading, MA: Helix Books.Google Scholar
- Glynn, S. M. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany and B. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 219–240). Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Harrison A.G., & Treagust, D.F. (1993). Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade 10 optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1291–1307.Google Scholar
- Harrison, A.G., & de Jong, O. (2004). Using multiple analogies: Case study of a chemistry teacher’s preparations, presentations and reflections. In the proceedings of European Science Education Research Association. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Hesse, M. B. (1963). Models and analogies in science. London: Seed and Ward.Google Scholar
- Hewitt. P. G. (1999). Conceptual physics, 3rd ed. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Nersessian, N. (1992). Constructing and instructing: The role of “abstraction techniques” in creating and learning physics. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 48–68). NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Stocklmayer, S. M., & Treagust, D.F. (1996). Images of electricity: How do novices and experts model electric current? International Journal of Science Education, 18, 163–178.Google Scholar
- Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., Joslin, P., & Lindauer, I. (1992). Science teachers use of analogies: Observations from classroom practice. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 413–422.Google Scholar
- Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1994). An interpretive examination of high school chemistry teachers’ analogical explanations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 227–242.Google Scholar
- Wong, E. D. (1993). Self generated analogies as a tool for constructing and evaluating explanations of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 367–380.Google Scholar