Advertisement

Moral Expertise: A Millian Perspective

  • Dale E. Miller
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 87)

Keywords

Moral Rule Practical Expertise Moral Expertise Utilitarian Perspective Rule Utilitarianism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bain, Alexander (1882). John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, Terrance (2000). ‘The Formation of Character: Mill’s “Ethology” Reconsidered.’ Polity XXXIII(Fall), 25–48.Google Scholar
  3. Bentham, Jeremy (1948). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, Fred (1984). Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brandt, Richart (1959). Ethical Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Brandt, Richard (1988). ‘Fairness to Indirect Optimific Theories in Ethics.’ Ethics, 357–360.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, D.G. (1974). ‘Mill’s Act Utilitarianism.’ Philosophical Quarterly 24, 67–68.Google Scholar
  8. Carlisle, Janet (1991). John Stuart Mill and the Writing of Character. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carlson, Erik (1990). ‘The Oughts and Cans of Objective Consequentialism.’ Utilitas 11, 91–96.Google Scholar
  10. Crisp, Roger (1997). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Utilitarianism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Eisenbach, Eldon J. (Ed.) (1999). Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gaus, Gerald F. (1980). ‘Mill’s Theory of Moral Rules.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58, 265–279.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, John (1983). Mill on Liberty: A Defence, 2nd ed. London: Routledge. 28–42.Google Scholar
  14. Hare, R.M. (1981). Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Howard-Snyder, Frances (1997). ‘The Rejection of Objective Consequentialism.’ Utilitas 9, 241–248.Google Scholar
  16. Howard-Snyder, Frances (1999). ‘Response to Carlson and Qizilbash.’ Utilitas 11, 106–111.Google Scholar
  17. Lenman, James (2000). ‘Consequentialism and Cluelessness.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 29, 342–370.Google Scholar
  18. Lyons, David (1965). Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  19. Lyons, David (1994). ‘Mill’s Theory of Morality.’ In: D. Lyons (Ed.), Rights, Welfare, and Mill’s Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in Noûs 10 (1976), 101–120).Google Scholar
  20. Mabbott, J.D. (1956). ‘Interpretations of Mill’s “Utilitarianism”.’ Philosophical Quarterly 6, 115–120.Google Scholar
  21. Mill, John Stuart (1832). ‘Austin’s Lectures on Jurisprudence.’ In: John M. Robson (ed.), Essays on Equality, Laws, and Education, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. XXI. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  22. Mill, John Stuart (1833). ‘Remarks on Bentham’s Philosophy.’ In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  23. Mill, John Stuart (1838). ‘Bentham.’ In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  24. Mill, John Stuart (1859a). ‘Letter to Alexander Bain (14 Nov.),’ In: Francis Mineka and Dwight N. Lindley (Eds.), The Later Letters: 1849 to 1873, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vols. XIV–XVII. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  25. Mill, John Stuart (1859b). On Liberty. In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Politics and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols. XVIII–XIX. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  26. Mill, John Stuart (1861a). Utilitarianism. In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  27. Mill, John Stuart (1861b). Considerations on Representative Government. In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Politics and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vols. XVIII–XIX. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  28. Mill, John Stuart (1872). A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vols. VII–VIII. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  29. Mill, John Stuart (1874). ‘Nature.’ In: John M. Robson (Ed.), Essays on Politics and Society, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. X. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, Dale E. (1998). ‘Internal Sanctions in Mill’s Moral Psychology.’ Utilitas 10 (1998), pp. 68–81.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, Dale E. (2003). ‘Actual-Consequence Act Utilitarianism and the Best Possible Humans.’ Ratio XVI, 49–62.Google Scholar
  32. Morales, Maria H. (1996). Perfect Equality: John Stuart Mill on Well-Constituted Communities. Lanham MA: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  33. Qizilbash, Mozaffar (1999). ‘The Rejection of Objective Consequentialism.’ Utilitas 11, 97–106.Google Scholar
  34. Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (2001). ‘Mill’s “Proof” of the Principle of Utility: A More Than Half-Hearted Defense.’ Social Philosophy and Policy 18, 330–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shaw, W. (1999). Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism. Malden, MA: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sidgwick, Henry (1981). The Methods of Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
  37. Singer, Marcus (1977). ‘Actual Consequence Utilitarianism.’ Mind 86, 67–77.Google Scholar
  38. Singer, Marcus (1983). ‘Further on Actual Consequence Utilitarianism.’ Mind 92, 270–274.Google Scholar
  39. Skorupski, John (1989). John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Smart, J.J.C. (1973). ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics.’ In: J.J.C. Smart and B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Temkin, Jack (1978). ‘Actual Consequence Utilitarianism: A Reply to Professor Singer.’ Mind 87, 412–414.Google Scholar
  42. Urmson, J.O. (1953). ‘The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J. S. Mill.’ Philosophical Quarterly 3, 33–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dale E. Miller

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations