First steps to assessing semantic equivalence of the EuroQol Instrument: Results of a questionnaire survey to members of the EuroQol Group

Allen T, Parker M, Amuyunzu M, Johnson K, Mwanzo I, Mwenesi H, Fox-Rushby J. Conceptions of health in quality of life research. Quality of Life Research 1997;6(7/8):614.Google Scholar

Amuyunzu M, Allen T, Mwenesi H, Johnson K, Egesah O, Parker M, Fox-Rushby J. The resonance of language: Health terms in Kenya. Quality of Life Research 1995;4(5):388.Google Scholar

Badia X, Fox-Rushby J, Herdman M. The cross-cultural adaptation and harmonisation of existing versions of the EuroQol questionnaire. A research proposal, Mimeo, 1996.Google Scholar

Barnwell K. Bible Translation: An introductory course in translation principles, 3rd edition, Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1992.Google Scholar

Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson N. Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments: From minimum requirements to optimal models. Quality of Life Research 1993;2(45):1–459.Google Scholar

Fawcett P. Translation and language. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing, 1997.Google Scholar

Fox-Rushby J, Mwenesi H, Parker M, Amuyunzu M, Egesah O, Johnson K, Allen T. Questioning premises: Health-related quality of life in Kenya. Quality of Life Research 1995;5(4):428–429.Google Scholar

Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. Development of the international versions of the EuroQol Instrument: Challenges for the future. In: Badia X, Herdman M, Segura A, editors. EuroQol Plenary Meeting Discussion Papers 1996: 123–134.Google Scholar

Fox-Rushby J, Johnson K, Mwanzo I, Amuyunzu M, Mwenesi H, Allen T, Parker M, Muthami M, Bowden A, Munguti K, Chiama O. Creating an instrument to assess lay perceptions of HRQL: Options and implications. Quality of Life Research 1997;6(7/8): 633.Google Scholar

Fox-Rushby J, Parker M. Culture and the measurement of health-related quality of life. European Review of Applied Psychology 1995;45(4):257–263.Google Scholar

Guyatt G H. The philosophy of translation. In: Shumaker S and Berzon R, editors. The International assessment of health-related quality of life: Theory, translation, measurement and analysis. Oxford: Rapid Communications, 1995.Google Scholar

Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. Equivalence and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life measures. Quality of Life Research 1997;6:237–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQL instruments: The universalist approach. Quality of Life Research 1998;7:323–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Larson M L. Meaning based translation: A guide to cross-language equivalence. University Press of America, 1984.Google Scholar

Mathias S D, Fifer S K, Patrick D L. Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international trials: Avoiding errors of the minimalist approach. Quality of Life Research 1994;3:403–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newmark P. A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall, International language teaching, 1988.Google Scholar

Robinson D. Translation and empire. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing, 1997.Google Scholar

Sartorius N, Kuyken W. Translation of health status instruments. In: Orley J, and Kuyken W, editors. Quality of life assessment: International perspectives. Heidleberg: Springer-Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar

Touw-Otten F, Meadows K. Cross-cultural issues. In: outcome measurement. In: Hutchinson A, McColl E, Christic M, Rittleton C, editors. Outcome measurement in primary and out-patient care. Harwood Academic Publishers 1996:199–208.Google Scholar

Wa Thiong’o N. Moving the centre: The struggle for cultural freedoms. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers, 1993a.Google Scholar

Wa Thiong’o N. The universality of local knowledge. In: Wa Thiong’o N. Moving the centre: The struggle for cultural freedoms. Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers, 1993b.Google Scholar