Planning for Tsunami-Resilient Communities

  • C. Jonientz-Trisler
  • R. S. Simmons
  • B. S. Yanagi
  • G. L. Crawford
  • M. Darienzo
  • R. K. Eisner
  • E. Petty
  • G. R. Priest
Chapter

Abstract

The National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program (NTHMP) Steering Committee consists of representatives from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the states of Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington. The program addresses three major components: hazard assessment, warning guidance, and mitigation. The first two components, hazard assessment and warning guidance, are led by physical scientists who, using research and modeling methods, develop products that allow communities to identify their tsunami hazard areas and receive more accurate and timely warning information. The third component, mitigation, is led by the emergency managers who use their experience and networks to translate science and technology into user-friendly planning and education products. Mitigation activities focus on assisting federal, state, and local o cials who must plan for and respond to disasters, and for the public that is deeply a ected by the impacts of both the disaster and the pre-event planning e orts. The division between the three components softened as NTHMP scientists and emergency managers worked together to develop the best possible products for the users given the best available science, technology, and planning methods using available funds.

Key words

tsunami mitigation Tsunami Ready tsunami warning tsunami evacuation tsunami planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Atwater, B. F., Cisternas, V. M., Bourgeois, J., Dudley, W. C., Hendley II, J. W., and Stauffer, P. H.: 1999, Surviving a Tsunami — Lessons from Chile, Hawaii, and Japan. USGS Circular 1187, 18 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Atwater, B. F., Cisternas, V. M., Bourgeois, J., Dudley, W. C., Hendley II, J. W., and Stauffer, P. H.: 2001, Sobreviviendo a un tsunami: lecciones de Chile, Hawai y Japòn. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1218, 18 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, E. N.: 2005, The U.S. National Tsunami Mitigation Program: A Successful State-Federal Partnership. Nat. Hazards 35, 5–24 (this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cisternas, M., and Martínez, P. (translators): 2000, Como sobrevivir a un maremoto: 11 lecciones del tsunami occurido en el sur de Chile el 22 de mayo de 1960. Servicio Hidrográfico y Oceanográfico de la Armada de Chile, 14 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Dengler, L.: 1998, Strategic Implementation Plan for Tsunami Mitigation Projects, approved by the Mitigation Subcommittee of the National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program, April 14, 1998. Technical Report NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL PMEL-113 (PB99-115552), NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA. http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/pubs/PDF/deng2030/deng2030.pdf.Google Scholar
  6. González, F. I., Sherrod, B. L., Atwater, B. F., Frankel, A. P., Palmer, S. P., Holmes, M. L., Karlin, B. E., Jaffe, B. E., Titov, V. V., Mofjeld, H. O., and Venturato, A. J.: 2003, Puget Sound Tsunami Sources — 2002 Workshop Report, A contribution to the Inundation Mapping Project of the U.S. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program. NOAA OAR Special Report, NOAA/OAR/PMEL, 34 pp.Google Scholar
  7. González, F. I., Titov, V. V., Mofjeld, H. O., Venturato, A., Simmons, S., Hansen, R., Combellick, R., Eisner, R., Hoirup, D., Yanagi, B., Young, S., Darienzo, M., Priest, G., Crawford, G., and Walsh, T.: 2005, Progress in NTHMP Hazard Assessment. Nat. Hazards 35, 89–110 (this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonientz-Trisler, C.: 1994, Cascadia Response to October 4, 1994 Kurile Islands Mw 8.3 Earthquake-Induced Tsunami Warning. Abstract, American Geophysical Union, Fall 1994 Meeting, Special Session on the Kurile Island Earthquake and Tsunami.Google Scholar
  9. Jonientz-Trisler, C.: 2001, The Mitigation Strategic Implementation Plan: Toward Tsunami Resistant Communities. In: Proceedings of the International Tsunami Symposium 2001 (ITS 2001) (on CD-ROM), NTHMP Review Session, R-8, Seattle, WA, 7–10 August 2001, pp. 119–159. http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/its2001/.Google Scholar
  10. Jonientz-Trisler, C., and Mullin, J.: 1999, 1997–1999 Activities of the Tsunami Mitigation Subcommittee: A Report to the Steering Committee NTHMP. FEMA Region 10 publication, 45 pp., Appendices.Google Scholar
  11. Lander, J. F., and Lockridge, P. A.: 1989, United States Tsunamis (Including United States Possessions) 1690–1988. NOAA Publication 41-2, 265 pp.Google Scholar
  12. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program: 1999–2004, TsuInfo Alert. Prepared for the NTHMP by C. Manson and L. Walkling, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources, published bi-monthly as a news-letter.Google Scholar
  13. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program: 2001, Designing for Tsunamis, 59 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Oregon Emergency Management and Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries: 2001, Tsunami Warning Systems and Procedures: Guidance for Local Officials. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Special Paper 35.Google Scholar
  15. Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Federal/State Working Group: 1996, Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Implementation Plan — A Report to the Senate Appropriations Committee, 22 pp., Appendices, http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tsunami-hazard/hazard3.pdf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Jonientz-Trisler
    • 1
  • R. S. Simmons
    • 2
  • B. S. Yanagi
    • 3
  • G. L. Crawford
    • 4
  • M. Darienzo
    • 5
  • R. K. Eisner
    • 6
  • E. Petty
    • 2
  • G. R. Priest
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Homeland SecurityFederal Emergency Management Agency, Region X, Mitigation DivisionBothellUSA
  2. 2.Alaska Division of Emergency ServicesFort RichardsonUSA
  3. 3.Hawaii Civil DefenseHonoluluUSA
  4. 4.Washington State Military DepartmentEmergency Management DivisionCamp MurrayUSA
  5. 5.Oregon Emergency ManagementSalemUSA
  6. 6.CISN and Earthquake ProgramsGovernor’s Office of Emergency ServicesOaklandUSA
  7. 7.Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Coastal Field OfficeCoastal 18 Section LeaderNewportUSA

Personalised recommendations