Dynamic Capillary Pressure Mechanism for Instability in Gravity-Driven Flows; Review and Extension to Very Dry Conditions

  • John L. Nieber
  • Rafail Z. Dautov
  • Andrey G. Egorov
  • Aleksey Y. Sheshukov
Chapter

Abstract

Several alternative mathematical models for describing water flow in unsaturated porous media are presented. These models are based on an equation for conservation of mass of water, and a generalized linear law for water flux (Darcy's law) containing a term called the dynamic capillary pressure. The distinct form of each alternative model is based on the specific form of expression used to describe the dynamic capillary pressure. The conventional representation arises when this pressure is set equal to the equilibrium pressure given by the capillary pressure — saturation function for unsaturated porous media, and this conventional approach leads to the Richards equation. Other models are derived by representing the dynamic capillary pressure by a rheological relationship stating that the pressure is not given directly by the capillary pressure — saturation function. Two forms of rheological relationship are considered in this manuscript, a very general non-equilibrium relation, and a more specific relation expressed by a first-order kinetic equation referred to as a relaxation relation. For the general non-equilibrium relation the system of governing equations is called the general Non-Equilibrium Richards Equation (NERE), and for the case of the relaxation relation the system is called the Relaxation Non-Equilibrium Richards Equation (RNERE). Each of the alternative models was analyzed for flow characteristics under gravity-dominant conditions by using a traveling wave transformation for the model equations, and more importantly the flow described by each model was analyzed for linear stability. It is shown that when a flow field is perturbed by infinitesimal disturbances, the RE is unconditionally stable, while both the NERE and the RNERE are conditionally stable. The stability analysis for the NERE was limited to disturbances in the very low frequency range because of the general form of the NERE model. This analysis resulted in what we call a low-frequency criterion (LFC) for stability. This LFC is also shown to apply to the stability of the RE and the RNERE. The LFC is applied to stability analysis of the RNERE model for conditions of initial saturation less than residual.

Keywords

Capillary Pressure Initial Water Content Richards Equation Unsaturated Porous Medium Anal Yses 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, R. S. and Hillel, D.: 1990, Laboratory tests of a theory of fingering during infiltration into layered soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauters, T. W. J., DiCarlo, C. A., Steenhuis, T. S. and Parlange, J.-Y.: 2000, Soil water content dependent wetting front characteristics in sands, J. Hydrol. 231–232, 244–254.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T.: 1964, Hydraulic properties of porous media, Hydrology Paper No. 3, Colorado State University, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmona, R. A. and Lacroix, J.: 1999, Spectral Theory of Random Schrodinger Operators, Birkhauser, Boston.Google Scholar
  5. Chuoke, R. L., van Meurs, P. and van der Poel, C.: 1959, The instability of slow immiscible, viscous liquid-liquid displacements in porous media, Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng. 216, 188–194.Google Scholar
  6. Cuesta, C., van Duijn, C. J. and Hulshof, J.: 2000, Infiltration in porous media with dynamic capillary pressure: traveling waves, Eur. J. Appl. Math. 11, 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahle, H. K., Celia, M. A., Hassanizadeh, S. M. and Karlsen, K. H.: 2002, A total pressure-saturation formulation of two-phase flow incorporating dynamic effects in the capillary-pressure-saturation relationship, in: S. M. Hassanizadeh, R. J. Schotting, W. G. Gray and G. F. Pinder (eds.), Computational Methods in Water Resources, Vol. 2, No. 47 in series of Developments in Water Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1067–1074.Google Scholar
  8. Deinert, M., Parlange, J.-Y., Steenhuis, T. S., Unlu, K., Selker, J. and Cady, K. B.: 2002, Real-time measurement of water profiles in a sand using neutron radiograph, in: Proceedings of the 22nd Ann. Am. Geophs. Union Hydrol. Days, pp. 56–63.Google Scholar
  9. De Rooij, G. H. and Cho, H.: 1999, Modelling solute leaching during fingered flow by integrating and expanding various theoretical and empirical concepts, Hydrol. Sci. J. 44, 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diment, G. A. and Watson, K. K.: 1983, Stability analysis of water movement in unsaturated porous materials, 2. Numerical studies, Water Resour. Res. 19, 1002–1010.Google Scholar
  11. Diment, G. A. and Watson, K. K.: 1985, Stability analysis of water movement in unsaturated porous materials, 3. Experimental studies, Water Resour. Res. 21, 979–984.Google Scholar
  12. Diment, G. A., Watson, K. K. and Blennerhassett, P. J.: 1982, Stability analysis of water movement in unsaturated porous materials, 1. Theoretical considerations, Water Resour. Res. 18, 1248–1254.Google Scholar
  13. Du, X., Yao, T., Stone, W. D. and Hendrickx, J. M. H.: 2001, Stability analysis of the unsaturated flow equation. 1. Mathematical derivation, Water Resour. Res. 37, 1869–1874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egorov, A. G., Dautov, R. Z., Nieber, J. L. and Sheshukov, A. Y.: 2002, Stability analysis of traveling wave solution for gravity-driven flow, in: S. M. Hassanizadeh, R. J. Schotting, W. G. Gray and G. F. Pinder (eds.), Computational Methods in Water Resources, Vol. 1, No. 47 in series of Developments in Water Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 121–128.Google Scholar
  15. Egorov, A. G., Dautov, R. Z., Nieber, J. L. and Sheshukov, A. Y.: 2003, Stability analysis of gravity-driven infiltrating flow, Water Resour. Res. 39, 1266, doi:10.1029/2002WR001886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glass, R. J., Parlange, J.-Y. and Steenhuis, T. S.: 1988, Wetting front instability as a rapid and far reaching hydrologic process in the vadose zone, in: Germann, P. F. (ed.), Rapid and Far Reaching Hydrologic Processes in the Vadose Zone, J. Conam. Hydrol. 3, 207–226.Google Scholar
  17. Glass, R. J., Steenhuis, T. S and Parlange, J.-Y.: 1989a, Mechanism for finger persistence in homogeneous, unsaturated porous media: theory and verification, Soil Sci. 148, 60–70.Google Scholar
  18. Glass, R. J., Steenhuis, T. S and Parlange, J.-Y.: 1989b, Wetting front instability, 1. Theoretical discussion and dimensional analysis, Water Resour. Res. 25, 1183–1194.Google Scholar
  19. Glass, R. J., Steenhuis, T. S and Parlange, J.-Y.: 1989c, Wetting front instability, 2. Experimental determination of relationships between system parameters and two-dimensional unstable flow field behavior in initially dry porous media, Water Resour. Res. 25, 1195–1207.Google Scholar
  20. Glass, R. J., Parlange, J.-Y. and Steenhuis, T. S.: 1991, Immiscible displacement in porous media: stability analysis of three-dimensional, axisymmetric disturbances with application to gravity-driven wetting front stability, Water Resour. Res. 27, 1947–1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hassanizadeh, S. M., Celia, M. A. and Dahle, H. K.: 2002, Dynamic effect in the capillary pressure-saturation relationship and its impacts on unsaturated flow, Vadose Zone J. 1, 28–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hassanizadeh, S. M. and Gray, W. G.: 1993, Thermodynamic basis of capillary pressure in porous media, Water Resour. Res. 29, 3389–3405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hill, D. E. and Parlange, J.-Y.: 1972, Wetting front instability in layered soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kapoor, V.: 1996, Criterion for instability of steady-state unsaturated flows, Transp. Porous Media 25, 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirkham, D. and Feng, L.: 1949, Some tests of the diffusion theory, and laws of capillary flow in soils, Soil Sci. 67, 29–40.Google Scholar
  26. Liu, Y., Steenhuis, T. S and Parlange, J.-Y.: 1994a, Closed-form solution for finger width in sandy soils at different water contents, Water Resour. Res. 30, 949–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu, Y., Steenhuis, T. S and Parlange, J.-Y.: 1994b, Formation and persistence of fingered flow fields in coarse grained soils under different moisture contents, J. Hydrol. 159, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mualem, Y.: 1974, A conceptual model of hysteresis, Water Resour. Res. 10, 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nieber, J. L.: 2001, The relation of preferential flow to water quality, and its theoretical and experimental quantification, In: D. Bosch and K. W. King (eds), Preferential Flow, Water Movement and Chemical Transport in the Environment, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI. pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  30. Nielson, D. R., Biggar, G. and Davidson, G.: 1962, Experimental consideration of diffusion analysis in unsaturated flow problems, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 26, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Otto, F.: 1996, L 1-contraction and uniqueness for quasilinear elliptic-parabolic equations, J. Diff. Eq. 131, 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Otto, F.: 1997, L 1-contraction and uniqueness for unstationary saturated-unsaturated water flow in porous media, Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. 7, 537–553Google Scholar
  33. Panfilov, M.: 1998, Upscaling two-phase flow in double porosity media: Nonuniform homogenization, in: J. M. Crolet and M. E. Hatri (eds), Recent Advances in Problems of Flow and Transport in Porous Media, pp. 195–215.Google Scholar
  34. Parlange, J.-Y. and Hill, D. E.: 1976, Theoretical analysis of wetting front instability in soils, Soil Sci. 122, 236–239.Google Scholar
  35. Philip, J. R.: 1957, The theory of infiltration, 4. Sorptivity analysis of algebraic infiltration equations, Soil Sci. 84, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Philip, J. R.: 1975a, Stability analysis of infiltration, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 39, 1042–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Philip, J. R.: 1975b, The growth of disturbances in unstable infiltration flows, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 39, 1049–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raats, P. A. C.: 1973, Unstable wetting fronts in uniform and nonuniform soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 681–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rawlins, S. L. and Gardner, W. H.: 1963, A test of the validity of the diffusion equation for unsaturated flow of soil water, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 27, 507–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rossi, C. and Nimmo, J. R.: 1994, Modeling of soil water retention from saturation to oven dryness, Water Resour. Res. 30, 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saffman, P. G. and Taylor, G.: 1958, The penetration of a fluid into a porous media or Hele-Shaw cell containing a more viscous fluid, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 245, 312–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Selker. J. S., Steenhuis, T. S. and Parlange, J.-Y.: 1992a, Wetting front instability in homogeneous sandy soils under continuous infiltration, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 1346–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Selker, J. S., Parlange, J.-Y. and Steenhuis, T. S.: 1992b, Fingered flow in two dimensions, 1, Measurement of matric potential, Water Resour. Res. 28, 2513–2521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sililo, O. T. N. and Tellam, J. H.: 2000, Fingering in unsaturated flow: a qualitative review with laboratory experiments on heterogeneous systems, Ground Water 38, 864–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smiles, D. E., Vachaud, G. and Vauclin, M.: 1971, A test of the uniqueness of the soil moisture characteristic during transient, non-hysteretic flow of water in rigid soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 35, 535–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, W. O.: 1967, Infiltration in sand and its relation to ground water recharge, Water Resour. Res. 3, 539–555.Google Scholar
  47. Starr, J. L., DeRoo, H. C., Frink, C. R., and Parlange, J. Y.: 1978, Leaching characteristics of a layered field soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 386–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tabuchi, T.: 1961, Infiltration and ensuing percolation in columns of layered glass particles packed in laboratory, Nogyo Dobuku kenkyn, Bessatsu (Trans. Agr. Eng. Soc. Japan), 1, 13–19. (in Japanese with summary in English).Google Scholar
  49. Topp G. C., Klute, A. and Peters, D. B.: 1967, Comparison of water content-pressure head data obtained by equilibrium, steady-state, and unsteady-state methods, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31, 312–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ursino, N.:2000, Linear stability analysis of infiltration, analytical and numerical solution, Transp. Porous Media 38, 261–271.Google Scholar
  51. van Genuchten, M. T.: 1980, A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang, Z., Feyen, J. and Elrick, D. E.: 1998a, Prediction of fingering in porous media, Water Resour. Res. 34, 2183–2190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang, Z., Feyen, J., van Genuchten, M. Th. and Nielsen D. R.: 1998b, Air entrapment effects on infiltration rate and flow instability, Water Resour. Res. 34, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wildenschild, D., Hopmans, J. W. and Simunek, J.: 2001, Flow rate dependence of soil hydraulic characteristics, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • John L. Nieber
    • 1
  • Rafail Z. Dautov
    • 2
  • Andrey G. Egorov
    • 3
  • Aleksey Y. Sheshukov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biosystems and Agricultural EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Computational Mathematics and CyberneticsKazan State UniversityKazanRussia
  3. 3.Chebotarev Research Institute of Mathematics and MechanicsKazan State UniversityKazanRussia

Personalised recommendations