File-Sharing Relationships — conflicts of interest in online gift-giving

  • Jörgen Skågeby
  • Daniel Pargman

Abstract

This paper suggests a relationship model for describing, analyzing and foreseeing conflicts of interest in file-sharing networks. The model includes levels of relationship ranging from the individual (ego), to the small group of close peers (micro), to a larger network of acquaintances (meso) to the anonymous larger network (macro). It is argued that an important focal point for analysis of cooperation and conflict is situated in the relations between these levels. Three examples of conflicts from a studied file-sharing network are presented. Finally, the relationship model is discussed in terms of applicability to other domains, recreational as well as professional.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adar, E., & Huberman, B. A., 2000. "Free Riding on Gnutella", First Monday, 5, number 10.Google Scholar
  2. Balasubramanian, S., & Mahajan, V., 2001. "The Economic Leverage of The Virtual Community", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5, number 3, pp. 103–138.Google Scholar
  3. Bergquist, M., & Ljungberg, J., 2001. "The Power of Gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities", Information Systems Journal, 22, number 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Connor, R. C., 1986. "Pseudo-reciprocity: Investing in Mutualism", Animal Behavior, number 34, pp. 1562–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ebare, S., 2004. "Digital music and subculture: Sharing files, sharing styles", First Monday, 9, number 2.Google Scholar
  6. Feldman, M., Lai, K., Stoica, I., & Chuang, J., 2004. "Robust Incentive Techniques for Peer-to-Peer Networks", Proceedings of the EC'04, New York, USA, ACM.Google Scholar
  7. Fernback, J., 1999. There is a There There: Notes Toward a Definition of Cybercommunity. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, London: SageGoogle Scholar
  8. Giesler, M., & Pohlmann, M., 2002. "The Anthropology of File Sharing: Consuming Napster as a Gift", Proceedings of the ACR Conference'02, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Godbout, J., & Caillé, A., 1992. The World of the Gift (D. Winkler, Trans.). Quebéc: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Golle, P., Leyton-Brown, K., & Mironov, I., 2001. "Incentives for Sharing in Peer-to-Peer Networks", Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Tampa, Florida, USA, ACM, pp. 264–267.Google Scholar
  11. Granovetter, M., 1973. "The Strength of Weak Ties", American journal of Sociology, 78, number 6, pp. 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardin, G., 1968. "The Tragedy of the Commons", Science, New Series, 162, number 3859, pp. 1243–1248.Google Scholar
  13. Hine, C., 2000. Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., & Andersen, H., 1994. "Moving Out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design", Proceedings of the ACM Conference on CSCW, Chapel Hill, USA, ACM, pp. 429–439.Google Scholar
  15. Iamnitchi, A., Ripeanu, M., & Foster, I., 2004. "Small-World File-Sharing Communities", Proceedings of the The 23rd Conference of the IEEE Communications Society, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  16. Kollock, P., 1998. Social Dilemmas: The Anatomy of Cooperation. In Annual Review of Sociology, pp. 183–214.Google Scholar
  17. Kollock, P., 1999. The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolm, S.-C., 2000. Introduction: The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism. In L.-A. Gérard-Varet, S.-C. Kolm & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), The Economics of Reciprocity, Giving and Altruism, London: MacMillan Press Ltd., pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
  19. Kozinets, R. V., 2002. "The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities", Journal of Marketing Research, 39, number 1, pp. 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2003). Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects (No. Working Paper 4425-03): MIT Sloan School of Management.Google Scholar
  21. Levine, S. S., 2001. "Kindness in Cyberspace? The Sharing of Valuable Goods On-line", Proceedings of the 10th Annual EICAR Conference, pp. 86–112.Google Scholar
  22. Lui, S. M., & Kwok, S. H., 2002. "Interoperability of Peer-To-Peer File Sharing Protocols", ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 3, number 3, pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
  23. McGee, K., & Skågeby, J., 2004. "Gifting Technologies", First Monday, 9, number 12.Google Scholar
  24. Orbell, J., & Dawes, R., 1981. Social Dilemmas. In G. M. Stephenson & J. M. Davis (Eds.), Progress in Applied Psychology, pp. 37–65.Google Scholar
  25. Osteen, M., 2003. Questions of the Gift. In M. Osteen (Ed.), The Question of the Gift, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Parker, A. (2004). The True Picture of Peer-to-Peer Filesharing: CacheLogic.Google Scholar
  27. Premkumar, G. P., 2003. "Alternate Distribution Strategies for Digital Music", Communications of the ACM, 46, number 9, pp. 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Putnam, R. D. (1993, March 21). The Prosperous Community-Social Capital and Public Life. The American Prospect, 4.Google Scholar
  29. Putnam, R. D., 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  30. Zeitlyn, D., 2003. "Gift economies in the development of open source software", Research Policy, 32, number 7, pp. 1287–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörgen Skågeby
    • 1
  • Daniel Pargman
    • 2
  1. 1.Linköping UniversitySweden
  2. 2.Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations