Collective Action in Electronic Networks of Practice: An Empirical Study of Three Online Social Structures

  • Fredric Landqvist
  • Robin Teigland


Electronic networks of practice are computer-mediated social spaces in which individuals working on similar problems self-organize to help each other and share perspectives. Based on previous research positing that the interaction created by network participants produces an online public good of knowledge, the purpose of this empirical paper is to use theories of public goods and collective action to investigate this provision of knowledge. While based on the same technology platform and a similar concept, we examine three cases in different professions: education, healthcare, and tourism by examining how the 1) heterogeneity of the individuals, 2) relational structure of social ties, 3) norms of behavior, 4) affective factors, and 5) sanctions for noncompliance impact the creation of a public good. We find that the most successful effort to create an electronic network of practice was within education and that one contributing factor was the site's ability to leverage existing offline networks of practice to create a relational structure of stronger social ties between members. In summary, these results reveal that taking a unitary view of the underlying collective masks possible heterogeneity along a number of important dimensions and as a result may undermine the likelihood that the public good is created and maintained.


Public Good Collective Action Electronic Network Affective Factor Sustainable Electronic Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. "Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges and Benefits," Communication of the Association for Information Systems (1) 1999, pp 1–28. Desanctis, G., and Monge, P. "Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations," Organization Science (10:6) 1999, pp 693–703.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, J.S. Foundations of Social Theory Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. Constant, D., Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. "The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice," Organization Science (7:2) 1996, pp 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Desanctis, G., and Roach, M. "Age, Size, and Contribution Dynamics in Online Learning Communities," Academy of Management Conference, Denver, CO, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. Fulk, J., Flanagin, A.J., Kalman, M.E., Monge, P.R., and Ryan, T. "Connective and Communal Public Goods in Interactive Communication Systems," Communication Theory (6:1) 1996, pp 60–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Head, J.G. "Public Goods and Public Policy," Public Finance (17:3) 1962, pp 197–219.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Kollock, P., and Smith, M.A. "Managing the Virtual Commons: Cooperation and Conflict in Computer Communities," in: Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross Cultural Perspectives, S. Herring (ed.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 109–128.Google Scholar
  8. Lakhani, K., and von Hippel, E. "How Open Source Software Works: "Free" User-to-User Assistance," The 3rd Intangibles Conference. Knowledge: Management, Measurement and Organization, Stern School of Business, NYU, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. Leana, C.R., and Van Buren, H.J.I. "Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices," The Academy Management Review (24:3) 1999, pp 538–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leonard-Barton, D. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. Lin, N. Social Capital Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. McAllister, D. "Affect-and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations," Academy of Management Journal (38:1) 1995, pp 24–59.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., and Porter, L. "The Measurement of Organizational Commitment," Journal of Vocational Behavior (14) 1979, pp 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage," Academy of Management Review (23:2) 1998, pp 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oliver, P.E., Marwell, G., and Teixeira, R. "A Theory of Critical Mass I: Group Heterogeneity, Interdependence and the Production of Collective Goods," American Journal of Sociology (91) 1985, pp 522–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1965.Google Scholar
  17. Organ, D.E. Organizational Citizenship Behavior Lexington Publishers, Lexington, MA, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. Orlikowski, W.J. "Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation," in: Computerization and Controversy, R. Kling (ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1996, pp. 173–189.Google Scholar
  19. Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.Google Scholar
  20. Putnam, R. "Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital," Journal of Democracy (6) 1995a, pp 65–78.Google Scholar
  21. Putnam, R. "Tuning in, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America," Political Science and Politics (December) 1995b, pp 664–683.Google Scholar
  22. Reisman, D. Theories of Collective Action: Downs, Olson and Hirsch The Macmillan Press Ltd, Hong Kong, 1990.Google Scholar
  23. Rheingold, H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. Ring, P.S., and Van de Ven, A.H. "Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships," Academy of Management Review (19) 1994, pp 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shmanske, S. Public Goods, Mixed Goods, and Monopolistic Competition Texas A&M University Press, College Station, 1991.Google Scholar
  26. Sproull, L., and Faraj, S. "Atheism, Sex and Databases: The Net as a Social Technology," in: Public Access to the Internet, B.K.J. Keller (ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995, pp. 62–81.Google Scholar
  27. Starbuck, W.H. "Learning by Knowledge Intensive Firms," Journal of Management Studies (29:6) 1992, pp 713–740.Google Scholar
  28. Teigland, R. (2003). Knowledge Networking: Structure and Performance in Networks of Practice. Published doctoral dissertation. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics.Google Scholar
  29. Van Maanen, J. & Barley, S. R. 1984. Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6. Greenwich, CO: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wasko, M., and Faraj, S. "It Is What One Does: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice," Journal of Strategic Information Systems (9:2–3) 2000, pp 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wasko, M., and Teigland, R. "The Provision of Online Public Goods: Examining Social Structure in a Network of Practice," Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 2002.Google Scholar
  32. Wasko, M.M. & Teigland, R. 2004. Public Goods or Virtual Commons? Applying Theories of Public Goods, Social Dilemmas, and Collective Action to Electronic Networks of Practice. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA). Special Issue on Virtual Communities.Google Scholar
  33. Wellman, B., and Gulia, M. "Net Surfers Don't Ride Alone," in: Communities in Cyberspace, P. Kollock and P. Smith (eds.), University of California Press, Berkeley, 1997.Google Scholar
  34. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., and Haythornthwaite, C. "Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community," Annual Review of Sociology (22) 1996, pp 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fredric Landqvist
    • 1
  • Robin Teigland
    • 2
  1. 1.Viktoria InstituteSweden
  2. 2.Stockholm School of EconomicsSweden

Personalised recommendations