Global Change and Mountain Regions pp 467-476

Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 23)

Monitoring Networks for Testing Model-Based Scenarios of Climate Change Impact on Mountain Plant Distribution

  • Antoine Guisan
  • Jean-Paul Theurillat


In recent years, predictive modelling of plant species’ distribution has been shown to be a powerful method for obtaining preliminary assessments of potential ecological impact of rapid climatic change (e.g. Brzeziecki et al. 1995; Kienast et al. 1996; Saetersdal and Birks 1997; Iverson and Prasad 1998; Lischke et al. 1998; Gottfried et al. 1999; Guisan and Theurillat 2000; 2001; Bakkenes et al. 2002). Such models give static results: they reveal where suitable species’ habitats might be located in a climatically changed future, but they do not explicitly consider all the processes leading to the predicted changes. A basic assumption behind their application is thus to consider present and future distributions of species to be in equilibrium, or at least in pseudo-equilibrium, with their environment (Guisan and Theurillat 2000). Although this assumption obviously does not hold in all ecological situations, scenarios obtained from these models nevertheless constitute an interesting spatially-explicit and quantitative basis for discussing how climate change might impact plant distribution. Examples of such discussions are provided in the next section.


Climate change Distributional changes Monitoring network Mountain flora Permanent plots Phenological change Predictive modelling Swiss Alps 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Austin, M. P. (2002). Spatial prediction of species distribution: An interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling 157, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakkenes, M., Alkemade, J. R. M., Ihle, F., Leemans, R., and Latour, J. B. (2002). Assessing the effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biology 8, 390–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binz, H. R., and Wildi, O. (1988). “Das Simulationsmodell MaB-Davos.” Schlussbericht Schweiz. MaB-Programm Nr. 33, Bundesamt für Umweltschutz, Bern.Google Scholar
  4. Brzeziecki, B., Kienast, F., and Wildi, O. (1995). Modeling potential impacts of climate change on the spatial distribution of zonal forest communities in Switzerland. Journal of Vegetation Science 6, 257–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carnelli, A. L. (2002). “Evolution of the vegetation at the subalpine-alpine ecocline during the Holocene: Comparative study in the Aletsch region, Val d’Arpette and Furkapass (Valais, Switzerland).” Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
  6. Chuine, I., Cambon G., and Comtois, P. (2000). Scaling phenology from the local to the regional level: Advances from species-specific phenological models. Global Change Biology? 6, 943–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chuine, I., and Beaubien, E. G. (2001). Phenology is a major determinant of tree species range. Ecology Letters 4, 500–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer, H. S. (1990). Simulating the distribution of plant communities in an alpine landscape. Coenoses 5, 37–43.Google Scholar
  9. Fitter, A. H., and Fitter, R. S. R. (2002). Rapid change in flowering time in British plants. Science 296, 1689–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gottfried, M., Pauli, H., Reitter, K., and Grabherr, G. (1999). A fine-scaled predictive model for changes in species distribution patterns of high mountain plants induced by climate wanning. Diversity and Distributions 5, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grabherr, G., Gottfried, M., and Pauli, H. (1994). Climate effects on mountain plants. Nature 369, 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grime, J. P. (1977). Evidence for the existence of three life history strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111, 1169–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guisan, A., Theurillat, J.-R., and Kienast, F. (1998). Predicting the potential distribution of plant species in an alpine environment. Journal of Vegetation Science 9, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guisan, A., and Theurillat, J.-P. (2000). Equilibrium modelling of alpine plant distribution and climate change: How far can we go? Phytocoenologia 30, 353–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guisan, A., and Zimmermann, N. E. (2000). Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135, 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guisan, A., and Theurillat, J.-P. (2001). Assessing alpine plant vulnerability to climate change: A modeling perspective. Integrated Assessment 1, 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C., and Hastie, T. (2002). Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distribution: Setting the scene. Ecological Modelling 157, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hughes, L. (2000). Biological consequences of global warming: Is the signal already apparent? TREE 15, 56–61.Google Scholar
  19. Huntley, B. (1991). How plant respond to climate change: Migration rates, individualism and the consequences for plant communities. Annals of Botany 67, 15–22.Google Scholar
  20. Huntley, B., Berry, P. M., Cramer, W., and McDonald, A. P. (1995). Modelling present and potential future ranges of some European higher plants using climate response surfaces. Journal of Biogeography 22, 967–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iverson, L. R., and Prasad, A. M. (1998). Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern United States. Ecological Monographs 68, 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keller, F. (1992). Automated mapping of mountain permafrost using the program PERMAKART within the geographical information system ARC/INFO. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 3, 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kienast, F., Wildi, O., and Brzeziecki, B. (1996). Potential impacts of climate change on species richness in mountain forests — An ecological risk assessment. Biological Conservation 83, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Körner, C. (2001). Why are there global gradient in species richness? Mountains might hold the answer. TREE 15, 513–514.Google Scholar
  25. Lischke, H., Guisan, A., Fischlin, A., and Bugmann, H. (1998). Vegetation response to climate change in the Alps: Modeling studies. In “Views from the Alps: Regional perspectives on climate change.” (P. Cebon, U. Dahinden, H. C. Davies, D. Imboden, and C. C. Jaeger, Eds.), pp. 309–350. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  26. Menzel, A., and Fabian, P. (1999). Growing season extended in Europe. Nature 397, 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Myneni, R. B., Keeling, C. D., Tucker, C. J., Asrar, G., and Nemani, R. R. (1997). Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386, 698–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Penuelas, J., and Filella, I. (2001). Responses to a warming world. Science 294, 793–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rupp, T. S., Chapin III, F. S., and Starfield, A. M. (2001). Modelling the influence of topographic barriers on treeline advance at the forest-tundra ecotone in Northwestern Canada. Climatic Change 48, 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saetersdal, M., and Birks, H. J. B. (1997). A comparative ecological study of Norwegian mountain plants in relation to possible future climatic change. Journal of Biogeography 24, 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schlüssel, A. (1999). Phàéologie, diversité et structure de la végétation dans l’écocline subalpin-alpin. Ph.D. thesis, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
  32. Steinger, T., Körner, C., and Schmid, B. (1996). Long-term persistance in a changing climate: DNA analysis suggests very old ages of clones of alpine Carex curvula. Oecologia 105, 94–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Theurillat, J.-R., Felber, F., Geissler, P., Gobat, J.-M., Fierz, M., Fischlin, A., Kupfer, P., Schlüssel, A., Velutti, C., and Zhao, G.-F. (1998). Sensitivity of plant and soils ecosystems of the Alps to climate change. In “Views from the Alps: Regional perspectives on climate change.” (P. Cebon, U. Dahinden, H. C. Davies, D. Imboden, and C. C. Jaeger, Eds.), pp. 225–308. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  34. Theurillat, J.-R., and Schlüssel, A. (2000). Phenology and distribution strategy of key plant species within the subalpine-alpine ecocline in the Valaisian Alps (Switzerland). Phytocoenologia 30, 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Theurillat, J. P., and Guisan, A. (2001). Potential impact of climate change on vegetation in the European Alps: A review. Climatic Change 50, 77–109. See also the Erratum 53 (2002), 529–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wagner, J., and Reichegger, B. (1997). Phenology and seed development of the alpine sedges Carex curvula and Carex firma in response to contrasting topoclimates. Arctic and Alpine Research 29, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J. C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., and Bairlein, F. (2002). Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antoine Guisan
    • 1
  • Jean-Paul Theurillat
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and EvolutionUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Centre Alpien de Phytogéographie (CAP)Fondation J.-M. AubertChampexSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations