Estimation of Air Pollution Parameters Using Artificial Neural Networks
The modeling of air pollution parameters is an issue investigated using different techniques. The pollution time series, however, are not continuous and contain gaps. Therefore, methods to infill the gaps providing satisfactory estimations are quite significant. In the presented study two ANN methods, feed forward back propagation, FFBP, and radial basis functions, RBF, were presented to estimate the SO2 values using the NO and CO values. It was seen that both ANN methods provided superior performances to conventional multi linear regression, MLR, method. The ANN performances were found satisfactory considering the selected performance criteria and the testing stage plots.
Key wordsAir pollution parameters artificial neural networks estimation radial basis functions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abdul-Wahab, S. A., and Al-Alawi, S. M., 2002, Assessment and prediction of tropospheric ozone concentration levels using artificial neural networks. Environmental Modeling & Software 17(3), pp. 219–228.Google Scholar
- ASCE Task Committee, 2000, Artificial neural networks in hydrology I. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 5(2), pp. 115–123.Google Scholar
- Broomhead, D., and Lowe, D., 1988, Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Syst. 2, pp. 321–355.Google Scholar
- Cigizoglu, H. K., and Kisi, O., 2005, Flow prediction by two back propagation techniques using k-fold partitioning of neural network training data. Nordic Hydrology 36(1) (in press).Google Scholar
- Gardner, M., and Dorling, S., 2001, Artificial neural network — derived trends in daily maximum surface ozone concentrations. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 51(8), pp. 1202–1210.Google Scholar
- Luk K C, Ball, J. E., and Sharma, A., 2000, A study of optimal model lag and spatial inputs to artificial neural network for rainfall forecasting. Journal of Hydrology 227(1–4), pp. 56–65.Google Scholar
- Maier, H. R., and Dandy, G. C., 2000, Neural network for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modeling issues and applications. Environmental Modeling and Software 15, pp. 101–124.Google Scholar
- McKendy, I. G., 2002, Evaluation of artificial neural networks for fine particulate pollution (PM10 and PM2.5) forecasting. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 52(9), pp. 1096–1101.Google Scholar
- Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., 1998, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., United States.Google Scholar
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002, Latest Findings on National Air Quality: 2002 Status and Trends, Accessed: 15.02.04. Available: http://www.epa.gov/airtrendsGoogle Scholar
- Wayne, R. P., 2000, Chemistry of Atmospheres. Oxford University Press, New York, United States.Google Scholar