Advertisement

Virus Evolution in the Face of the Host Response

  • Esteban Domingo
Conference paper
  • 978 Downloads

Abstract

Microbial infections are highly dynamic. Viruses have evolved two main strategies against the host response: interaction or evasion. Interaction is typical of complex DNA viruses. Their genomes encode a number of proteins that exert modulatory functions that alter the immune response of the host. Evasion strategy is used mainly by RNA viruses, and is based on high mutation rates and quasispecies dynamics. The complexity of viral populations demands research on new antiviral strategies that take into consideration the adaptive potential of viruses, in particular RNA viruses.

Keywords

High Mutation Rate Virus Evolution Evasion Strategy Antiviral Strategy Major Histocompatibility Complex Protein 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. & Walter, P. 2002. Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York, NY: Garland Science.Google Scholar
  2. Alcami, A. 2003. Viral mimicry of cytokines, chemokines and their receptors. Nature Reviews Immunology, 3: 36–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baranowski, E., Ruiz-Jarabo, C.M. & Domingo, E. 2001. Evolution of cell recognition by viruses. Science, 292: 1102–1105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baranowski, E., Ruíz-Jarabo, C.M., Pariente, N., Verdaguer, N. & Domingo, E. 2003. Evolution of cell recognition by viruses: a source of biological novelty with medical implications. Advances in Virus Research, 62: 19–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batschelet, E., Domingo, E. & Weissmann, C. 1976. The proportion of revertant and mutant phage in a growing population, as a function of mutation and growth rate. Gene, 1: 27–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bushman, F. 2002. Lateral DNA Transfer. Mechanisms and Consequences. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
  7. Campo, M.S. 2002. Virus escape from immunosurveillance. Virus Research, 88: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Domingo, E. 2000. Viruses at the edge of adaptation. Virology, 270: 251–253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Domingo, E. 2003. Quasispecies and the development of new antiviral strategies. Progress in Drug Research, 60: 133–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Domingo, E. 2004. Microbial evolution and emerging diseases. In: C. Power and T. Johnson (eds). Emerging Neurological Infections. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  11. Domingo, E. & Holland, J.J. 1992. Complications of RNA heterogeneity for the engineering of virus vaccines and antiviral agents. Genetic Engineering (N Y), 14: 13–31.Google Scholar
  12. Domingo, E., Biebricher, C., Eigen, M. & Holland, J.J. 2001. Quasispecies and RNA Virus Evolution: Principles and Consequences. Austin TX: Landes Bioscience.Google Scholar
  13. Drake, J.W. & Holland, J.J. 1999. Mutation rates among RNA viruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96: 13910–13913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eigen, M. 1996. On the nature of virus quasispecies. Trends in Microbiology, 4: 216–218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eigen, M. 2002. Error catastrophe and antiviral strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99: 13374–13376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eigen, M. & Biebricher, C.K. (eds). 1988. Sequence space and quasispecies distribution. Vol. 3, in: RNA Genetics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  17. Eigen, M. & Schuster, P. 1979. The Hypercycle. A Principle of Natural Self-organization. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Graci, J.D. & Cameron, C.E. 2002. Quasispecies, error catastrophe, and the antiviral activity of ribavirin. Virology, 298: 175–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Holland, J.J., de La Torre, J.C. & Steinhauer, D.A. 1992. RNA virus populations as quasispecies. Current Topics in Microbiological Immunology, 176: 1–20.Google Scholar
  20. Isaguliants, M.G. 2003. Hepatitis C virus clearance: the enigma of failure despite an impeccable survival strategy. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 4: 169–183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnston, J.B. & McFadden, G. 2003. Poxvirus immunomodulatory strategies: current perspectives. Journal of Virology, 77: 6093–6100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. López-Bueno, A., Mateu, M.G. & Almendral, J.M. 2003. High mutant frequency in populations of a DNA virus allows evasion from antibody therapy in an immunodeficient host. Journal of Virology, 77: 2701–2708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahy, B.W. 1997. Human viral infections: an expanding frontier. Antiviral Research, 36: 75–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Murphy, F.A. & Nathanson, N. 1994. The emergence of new virus diseases: an overview. Seminars in Virology, 5: 87–102.Google Scholar
  25. Seet, B.T., Johnston, J.B., Brunetti, C.R., Barrett, J.W., Everett, H., Cameron, C., Sypula, J., Nazarian, S.H., Lucas, A. & McFadden, G. 2003. Poxviruses and immune evasion. Annual Review of Immunology, 21: 377–423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IAEA 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esteban Domingo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA)Valdeolmos, MadridSpain
  2. 2.Centro de Biología Molecular “Severo Ochoa” (CSIC-UAM)Universidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations