Human Subject Protections

American Association of University Professors. “Protecting Human Beings: Institutional Review Boards and Social Science Research.” Academe (May/June 2001).Google Scholar

Anderson, Paul. "Simple Gifts: Ethical Issues In The Conduct of Person-Based Composition Research.” College Composition and Communication 49, no. 1 (February 1998).Google Scholar

Beecher, H.K. “Ethics and Clinical Research,” New England Journal of Medicine 274 (1966): 1354–1360.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Begley, S. “Science Journal.” The Wall Street Journal (November 1, 2002): B1.Google Scholar

Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45. Public Welfare Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Office For Protection from Research Risks, Part 46: “Protection of Human Subjects.” Revised November 13, 2001; Effective December 13, 2001.Google Scholar

Ellis, G.B. “Exempt Research and Research that may Undergo Expedited Review.” Office for Protection from Research Risks (May 5, 1995).Google Scholar

Elmer-Dewitt, P. “Cloning: Where Do We Draw the Line?” Time Magazine (November 8, 1993).Google Scholar

Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. 21 USCA §301 et seq. (1938).Google Scholar

Finkin, Mathew W. “Academic Freedom and the Prevention of Harm in Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities.” Illinois Conference Proceedings (2003). Available on conference website: http://www.law.uiuc.edu/conferences/humansubject/index.aspGoogle Scholar

“Guidelines for the Ethical Treatment of Students and Student Writing in Composition Studies.” Conference on College Composition and Communication 52 (2000): 485–490.Google Scholar

Gunsalus, C.K. “An Examination of Issues Presented by Proposals to Unify and Expand Federal Oversight of Human Subject Research.” National Bioethics Advisory Commission paper. September 1998. D–6.Google Scholar

____. “Thinking About Two People Talking.” Ethics and Behavior (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Howe, K.R. and K.C. Dougherty. “Ethics, Institutional Review Boards, and the Changing Face of Educational Research.” Educational Researcher 22, no. 9 (1993): 16–21.Google Scholar

Humphreys, Laud. Tearoom Trade. Chicago: Aldine, 1970.Google Scholar

Jones, J.H. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: New York Free Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Levine, R.J. “The Boundaries Between Biomedical or Behavioral Research and the Accepted and Routine Practice of Medicine.” The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978.Google Scholar

Morgan, D. “Ethical Issues Raised by Students’ Personal Writing.” College English 60 (March 1998): 318–325.Google Scholar

National Bioethics Advisory Commission. “Cloning Human Beings: Ethical Considerations.” June 1997.Google Scholar

____. “Ethical Issues in Human Stem-Cell Research.” September 1999.Google Scholar

____. Full Commission Meeting. Arlington, Virginia: May 17, 1997.Google Scholar

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. “The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.” DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78-0008.Google Scholar

National Institutes of Health, Office of Extramural Research, Office for Protection from Research Risks. Protecting Human Research Subjects: Institutional Review Board Guidebook. 1993.Google Scholar

Nishimi, Robyn Y. (Senior Associate, Office of Technology Assessment). Testimony at the Hearing Before the Legislation and National Security Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 28, 1994.Google Scholar

Office for Human Research Protection. Guidance Letter. September 22, 2003.Google Scholar

“Protecting Human Beings: Institutional Review Boards and Social Science Research.” Academe (May/June 2001).Google Scholar

Puglisi, Tom (Office for Protection from Research Risks). Personal communication. September 1998.Google Scholar

“Researchers Seek Answers After Gene-Therapy Patient Dies.” The Pennsylvania Gazette (November/December 1999).Google Scholar

Research Revitalization Act of 2002. (§ 3060).Google Scholar

Rothman, D.J. Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making. New York: Basic Books, 1991.Google Scholar

“Should All Disciplines Be Subject to the Common Rule?: Human Subjects of Social Science Research.” Academe (May/June 2002): 62–69.Google Scholar

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics, Special Working Committee to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. “Giving Voice to the Spectrum.” June 2004.Google Scholar

Sieber, J., S. Plattner, and P. Rubin. “How (Not) to Regulate Social and Behavioral Research.” Professional Ethics Report 2 (Spring 2002): 1–4.Google Scholar

Tavris, C. Skeptical Inquirer 26 (July/Aug 2002).Google Scholar

Tarr, N.W. “Clients’ and Students’ Stories: Avoiding Exploitation and Complying with the Law to Produce Scholarship with Integrity.” Clinical Law Review 5 (1998).Google Scholar