Generating Multimedia Presentations from Plain Text to Screen Play

  • Paul Piwek
  • Richard Power
  • Donia Scott
  • Kees Van Deemter
Part of the Text, Speech and Language Technology book series (TLTB, volume 27)


Semantic Content Plain Text Document Structure Patient Information Leaflet Natural Language Generation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7. References

  1. ABPI (1997). Compendium of Patient Information Leaflets. Assocation of the British Pharmaceutical Industry.Google Scholar
  2. André, E., Rist, T., van Mulken, S., Klesen, M., and Baldes, S. (200). The automated design of believable dialogues for animated presentation teams. In Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., and Churchill, E., editors, Embodied Conversational Agents, pages 220–255. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bateman, J., Kamps, T., Kleinz, J. and Reichenberger, K. (2001). Towards Constructive Text, Diagram, and Layout Generation for Information Presentation. Computational Linguistics, 27(3), 409–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouayad-Agha, N., Power, R., Scott D., and Belz, A. (2002). PILLS: Multilingual generation of medical information documents with overlapping content. In Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2002), pages 220–255. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bouayad-Agha, N., Scott, D., and Power, R. (2000). Integrating content and style in documents: a case study of patient information leaflets. Information Design Journal, 9/2–3:161–176.Google Scholar
  6. Cahill, L., Carroll, J., Evans, R., Pavia, D., Power, R., Scott, D., and van Deemter, K (2001). From RAGS to RICHES: exploiting the potential of a flexible generation architecture. In Proceedings of ACL/EACL-01, pages 98–105 Toulouse.Google Scholar
  7. Dale, R. and Reiter, E. (1995). Computational interpretations of the Gricean maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science, 19:233–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grice, P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66:377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (1958) The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Hovy, E.,H. (1988) Generating Natural Language under Pragmatic Constraints. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Jameson, A. (1987). How to appear to be conforming to the ‘maxims’ even if you prefer to violate them. In Kempen, G., editor, Natural LanguageGeneration: New Results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology and Linguistics. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Kamp, H. and Reyle U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model-theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  13. Kerpediev and Roth (2000). Mapping communicative goals into conceptual tasks to generate graphics in discourse. In Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  14. Krenn, B., Pirker, H., Grice, M., Baumann, Piwek, P., van Deemter, K., Schröder, M., Klesen, M. and Gstrein, E. (2002). Generation of multi-modal dialogue to net environments. In Busemann, S., editor, KONVENS 2002, pages 91–98, Saarbruecken, Germany.Google Scholar
  15. Levesque, H. (1986). Making believers out of computers. Artificial Intelligence, 30:81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mann, W. and Thompson, S. (1987). Rhetorical structure theory: a theory of text organisation. ISI Technical Report ISI/RS-87-190.Google Scholar
  17. McKeown, K., Feiner, Robin, Seligman, and Tananblatt. Generating Cross-references for multimedia explanation. In Proceedings of 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, p.9–16.Google Scholar
  18. Nunberg, G. (1990). The Linguistics of Punctuation. CSLI, Stanford, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Paiva, D. (1998). A survey of applied natural language generation systems. Information Technology Research Institute Technical Report, ITRI-98-03.Google Scholar
  20. Paraboni and van Deemter (2002). Towards the generation of Document-Deictic references. In K. van Deemter and R. Kibble (Eds.) Information Sharing: Reference and Presupposition in Language Generation and Interpretation. CSLI Publications, Stanford, Ca.Google Scholar
  21. Paris, C., Vander Linden, K., Fischer, M., Hartley, A., Pemberton, L., Power, R., and Scott, D. (1995). A support tool for writing multilingual instructions. In Proceedings of the 14 th international Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1398–1404, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  22. Pineda, L. (2000). Spatial language, deixis and illustration. In Proceedings of Workshop on Coherence in Generated Multimedia, INLG, 2000 Mitzpe Ramon, Isreal.Google Scholar
  23. Piwek, P., Krenn B., Schröder, M., Grice, M., Baumann S., and Pirker, H. (2002). RRL: A rich representation language for the description of agent behaviour in NECA. In Proceedings of AAMAS workshop ‘Embodied conversational agents — let's specify and evaluate them!', Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
  24. Piwek, P. and van Deemter, K. (2002). Towards automated generation of scripted dialogue. In Proceedings the 6 th workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  25. Piwek, P and van Deemter, K. (2003) Dialogue as Discourse: Controlling Properties of Scripted Dialogue. In Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Natural Language Generation in Spoken & Written Dialogue, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  26. Power, R. (2000). Planning texts by constraint satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-2000).Google Scholar
  27. Power, R. and Scott, D. (1998). Multilingual authoring using feedback texts. In Proceedings of the 17 th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 36 th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1053–1059, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  28. Power, R., Scott, D., and Bouayad-Agha, N. (2003a). Document Structure. Computational Linguistics, 29(2)Google Scholar
  29. Power, R., Scott, D., and Bouayad-Agha, N. (2003b). Generating texts with style. In Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference on Intelligent Texts Processing and Computational Linguistics, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  30. Cahill, L., Doran, C., Evans, R., Mellish, C., Paiva, P., Reape, M., Scott, D., and Tipper, N. (1999). Towards a Reference Architecture for Natural Language Generation Systems. ITRI Technical Report ITRI-99-14 Google Scholar
  31. Reiter, E. and Dale, R. (2000). Building Applied Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Rubinstein, A. (2000). Economics and Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Deemter, K. (1999). Document generation and picture retrieval. In Proceedings of Third International Conference on Visual Information Systems, Amsterdam. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Van Deemter, K. and Power, R. (in press). High-level authoring of illustrated documents. To appear in Natural Language Engineering, 9 (2).Google Scholar
  35. Van Kuppevelt, J. (1995). Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics, 31:109–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wahlster, W., André, E., Finkler, W., Profitlich, H.-J., and Rist, T. (1993). Plan-based Integration of Natural Language and Graphics Generation. Artificial Intelligence, 63, pp. 387–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walker, M.A., Cahn, J.E., and Whittaker, S.J. (1996). Linguistic Style Improvisation for Life-like Computer Characters. In Proceedings of the AAAI workshop on AI, A-life, and Entertainment. Portland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Piwek
    • 1
  • Richard Power
    • 1
  • Donia Scott
    • 1
  • Kees Van Deemter
    • 1
  1. 1.ITRI - University of BrightonBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations