Funology pp 55-65 | Cite as

Enjoyment: Lessons from Karasek

  • Petter Bae Brandtzæg
  • Asbjørn Følstad
  • Jan Heim
Chapter
Part of the Human-Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS, volume 3)

Keywords

Social Cohesion Mobile Telephone User Control Decision Latitude Skill Discretion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  2. Battarbee, K, Mattelmäki, T., & Mäkelä, A., (2000). Design for user experience, method lessons form a design student workshop. Proceedings of the 1th Nordic CHI. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  3. Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1960). Group dynamics. Research and Theory. (2nd ed.). Evanstone: Row, Peterson and Company.Google Scholar
  4. Choi, D., Kim, H., & Kim, J. (1999). Toward the Construction of Fun Computer Games: Differences in the Views of Developers and Players. Personal Technologies, 3, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.Google Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). Flow. The psychology of happiness. London: Rider.Google Scholar
  7. Davenport, G., Holmquist, L. E., & Thomas, M. (1998). Fun: A Condition of Creative Research. IEEE Multi Media, 5,3, 10–15.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1111–1132.Google Scholar
  9. December, J. (1996). Units of analysis for Internet communication. Journal of Communication, 46,1, 14–38.Google Scholar
  10. Draper, S.W. (1999). Analysing Fun as a Candidate Software Requirement. Personal Technologies, 3, 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus S.E., & Athanasiou. (1986) Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide. JCMC, 6,1. Retrieved April 16, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
  13. Freud, S. (1960). Jokes and their relations to the unconscious. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  14. Hassenzhal, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M. and Lehner, K. (2000). Hedonic and Ergonomic Quality Aspects Determine a Software’s Appeal. (pp. 201–208) Proceedings of the CHI 2000 conference on Human factors in computing systems. April 1–6, 2000, The Hague Netherlands.Google Scholar
  15. Hogg, M., & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In Hogg, M., & Abrams, D. (Eds.), Group Motivation. Social Psychological Perspectives. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  16. Holmquist, L.E. (1997). The right kind of challenge. In (Eds.) Braa, K., & Monteiro, E., Proceedings of the 20th Informations systems Research seminar in Scandinavia. IRIS 20. Department of Informatics, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  17. Igbaria, M.; Schiffman, S. J., & Wieckowski, T. J. (1994). The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13,6, 349–361.Google Scholar
  18. Jensen, R. (1999). Dream Society. The Coming Shift from Information to Imagination. London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  19. Jordan, P. W. (1997). The four pleasures — taking human factors beyond usability. Proceedings of the 13th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, 2, 364–365. Helsinki: Finnish Institute for Occupational Health.Google Scholar
  20. Karasek, R. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 258–307.Google Scholar
  21. Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
  22. Laurel, B. (1991). Computer as Theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  23. Ling, R (1999). We release them little by little. Maturation and gender identity as seen in the use of mobile telephony, Telenor R&D Report 5/99.Google Scholar
  24. Mäkelä, A., & Battarbee (1999). It’s Fun to do Things Together: Two Cases of Explorative User Studies. Personal Technologies, 3-137-140.Google Scholar
  25. Mäkelä, A., Giller, V. Tscheligi, V., & Sefelin, R. (2000). Joking, storytelling, artsharing, expressing affection: a field trial of how children and their social network communicate with digital images in leisure time. (pp. 548–555). Proceedings of the CHI 2000 conference on Human factors in computing systems. April 1–6, 2000, The Hague Netherlands.Google Scholar
  26. Monk, A.F. (2000) User-centred design: the home use challenge. In Sloane, A., & van Rijn, F. (Eds.), Home informatics and telematics: information technology and society (pp. 181–190). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Nielsen, J. (1996). Seductive user interface. Retrieved April 12, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.useit.com/papers/seductiveui.html
  28. Oliver, R. L. (1981). “Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction in Retail Settings.” Journal of Retailing 57 (Fall). 25–48. Peppers, D. and Rogers, M. (1993). The One to One Future: Building Relationships One Customer at a Time. New York. Currency/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  29. Shneiderman, B. (1987). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Skelly, T. (1995). Seductive Interfaces — Engaging, Not Enraging the user. Microsoft Interactive Media Conference. Retrieved April 10, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.designhappy.com/sedint/TheMaze.htm
  31. Springel, S. (1999). The New Media Paradigm: Users as Creators of Content. Personal Technologies, 3, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sonnentag, S. (1996). Work Group Factors and Individual Well-being. In West, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 345–367). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  33. Thackara, J. (2000). The design challenge of pervasive computing. CHI, 2000. Retrieved April 1, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.doorsofperception.com/projects/chi/
  34. Wartella, E., O’Keefe, B., & Scantlin, R. (2000), Children and Interactive Media. A compendium of current research and directions for the future. A report to the Markle Foundation. Markle Foundation. Retrieved February 2, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.markle.org/news/digital_kids.pdf
  35. Weilenmann, A., & Larsson, C. (2000). Collaborative Use of Mobile Telephones: A Field Study of Swedish Teenagers. Proceedings of the 1th Nordic CHI. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  36. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petter Bae Brandtzæg
  • Asbjørn Følstad
  • Jan Heim

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations