Yearbook of Morphology 2004 pp 229-271

Part of the Yearbook of Morphology book series (YOMO)

Syncretism and iconicity in Icelandic noun declensions: a Distributed Morphology approach

  • Gereon Müller

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexiadou, Artemis and Gereon Müller (2004). Class Features as Probes. Ms., Universität Stuttgart and IDS Mannheim.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Stephen (1969). An Outline of the Phonology of Modern Icelandic Vowels. Foundations of Language 5, 53–72.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Stephen (1985). Phonology in the Twentieth Century. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Stephen (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Aronoff, Mark (1994). Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown and Greville Corbett (2002). Case Syncretism in and out of Indo-European. In: M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston and S. Neuvel (eds.) The Main Session. Papers from the 37th Meeting. Vol. 1. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 15–28.Google Scholar
  7. Bierwisch, Manfred (1967). Syntactic Features in Morphology: General Problems of So-Called Pronominal Inflection in German. In: To Honour Roman Jakobson. The Hague/Paris: Mouton, 239–270.Google Scholar
  8. Bittner, Dagmar (2002). Semantisches in der pronominalen Flexion des Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 21, 196–233.Google Scholar
  9. Blevins, James (2003). Inflectional Classes and Economy. Ms., University of Cambridge. To appear in G. Müller, L. Gunkel, and G. Zifonun (eds.) Explorations in Nominal Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Bobaljik, Jonathan (2002). Syncretism without Paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1981, 1994. In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 2001. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 53–85.Google Scholar
  11. Bonet, Eulália (1991). Morphology after Syntax. PhD thesis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
  12. Braunmüller, Kurt (1984). Morphologische Undurchsichtigkeit — ein Charakteristikum kleiner Sprachen. Kopenhagener Beiträge zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 48–68.Google Scholar
  13. Cameron-Faulkner, Thea and Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy (2000). Stem Alternants as Morphological Signata: Evidence from Blur Avoidance in Polish Nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 813–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carstairs, Andrew (1987). Allomorphy in Inflexion. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  15. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1991). Inflection Classes: Two Questions with One Answer. In: F. Plank (ed.) Paradigms. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 213–253.Google Scholar
  16. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1994). Inflection Classes, Gender, and the Principle of Contrast. Language 70, 737–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (2001). Umlaut as Signans and Signatum: Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects. In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1999. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–24.Google Scholar
  18. Chomsky, Noam (2001). Derivation by Phase. In: M. Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale. A Life in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1–52.Google Scholar
  19. Corbett, Greville and Norman Fraser (1993). Network Morphology: A DATR Account of Russian Nominal Inflection. Journal of Linguistics 29, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crosswhite, Katherine (2000). Sonority-Driven Reduction. Ms., University of Rochester. To appear in Proceedings of BLS 26.Google Scholar
  21. Frampton, John (2002). Syncretism, Impoverishment, and the Structure of Person Features. Ms., Northeastern University. To appear in Papers from the 2002 Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting.Google Scholar
  22. Gallmann, Peter (1998). Case Underspecification in Morphology, Syntax and the Lexicon. In: A. Alexiadou and C. Wilder (eds.) Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 141–175.Google Scholar
  23. Guðfinnsson, Björn (1957). Íslensk málfræði handa grunnskólum og framhaldsskólum. Reykjavík: Námsgagnastofnun.Google Scholar
  24. Gunkel, Lutz (2003). Syncretisms and Case Underspecification in Polish Noun Paradigms. In: P. Banski and A. Przepiórkowski (eds.) Generative Linguistics in Poland: Morphosyntactic Investigations. Warsaw: Proceedings of the GLiP-5 Conference held in Warsaw, 47–62.Google Scholar
  25. Halle, Morris (1992). The Latvian Declension. In: G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 33–47.Google Scholar
  26. Halle, Morris (1994). The Russian Declension: An Illustration of the Theory of Distributed Morphology. In: J. Cole and C. Kisseberth (eds.) Perspectives in Phonology. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 29–60.Google Scholar
  27. Halle, Morris (1997). Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission. In: B. Bruening, Y. Kang and M. McGinnis (eds.) Papers at the Interface. Vol. 30, MITWPL, 425–449.Google Scholar
  28. Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz (1993). Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In: K. Hale and S.J. Keyser (eds.) The View from Building 20. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 111–176.Google Scholar
  29. Hankamer, Jorge and Judith Aissen (1974). The Sonority Hierarchy. In: A. Bruck, R. Fox and M. Labaly (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, 131–145.Google Scholar
  30. Harley, Heidi (1994). Hug a Tree: Deriving the Morphosyntactic Feature Hierarchy. In: A. Carnie and H. Harley (eds.) MITWPL 21: Papers on Phonology and Morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 275–288.Google Scholar
  31. Harley, Heidi and Rolf Noyer (2003). Distributed Morphology. In: L. Cheng and R. Sybesma (eds.) The Second GLOT International State-of-the-Article Book. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 463–496.Google Scholar
  32. Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn (2003). Einfache Beschreibung isländischer Flexionsklassen. Ms., Aarhus Universitet.Google Scholar
  33. Jakobson, Roman (1962). Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. In: Selected Writings. Vol. 2, The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 23–71.Google Scholar
  34. Kiparsky, Paul (1973). ‘Elsewhere’ in Phonology. In: S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York, Academic Press, 93–106.Google Scholar
  35. Kress, Bruno (1982). Isländische Grammatik. 1 edn, VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  36. Krifka, Manfred (2003). Case Syncretism in German Feminines: Typological, Functional, and Structural Aspects. Ms., ZAS Berlin.Google Scholar
  37. Kristoffersen, Kristian Emil (2002). The Morphology of Old Nordic I: Old Icelandic and Old Norwegian. In: O. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. Jahr, A. Karker, H.-P. Naumann and U. Teleman (eds.) The Nordic Languages. Vol. 1 of Handbücher zur Sprach-und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Berlin: de Gruyter, 911–925.Google Scholar
  38. Lass, Roger (1990). How to Do Things with Junk. Journal of Linguistics 26, 79–102.Google Scholar
  39. Lumsden, John (1992). Underspecification in Grammatical and Natural Genders. Linguistic Inquiry 23, 469–486.Google Scholar
  40. Matthews, Peter (1974). Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. McCreight, Katherine and Catherine Chvany (1991). Geometric Representation of Paradigms in a Modular Theory of Grammar. In: F. Plank (ed.) Paradigms. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 91–111.Google Scholar
  42. Müller, Gereon (2002). Remarks on Nominal Inflection in German. In: I. Kaufmann and B. Stiebels (eds.) More than Words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 113–145.Google Scholar
  43. Müller, Gereon (2004). A Distributed Morphology Approach to Syncretism in Russian Noun Inflection. In: O. Arnaudova, W. Browne, M.L. Rivero and D. Stojanovic (eds.) Proceedings of FASL 12, 353–373. University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  44. Müller, Gereon (i.p.). Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich: Kasus und Numerus. Ms., IDS Mannheim.Google Scholar
  45. Noreen, Adolf (1903). Altisländische und altnorwegische Grammatik. 3 edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  46. Noyer, Rolf (1992). Features, Positions, and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. PhD thesis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
  47. Noyer, Rolf (1998). Impoverishment Theory and Morphosyntactic Markedness. In: S. Lapointe, D. Brentari and P. Farrell (eds.) Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Palo Alto: CSSLI, 264–285.Google Scholar
  48. Oltra Massuet, Isabel (1999). On the Notion of Theme Vowel: A New Approach to Catalan Verbal Morphology. Master of science thesis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
  49. Pétursson, Magnús (1992). Lehrbuch der isländischen Sprache. 3 edn, Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
  50. Plank, Frans (1979). Ikonisierung und De-Ikonisierung als Prinzipien des Sprachwandels. Sprachwissenschaft 4, 121–158.Google Scholar
  51. Plank, Frans (1991). Rasmus Rask’s Dilemma. In: F. Plank (ed.) Paradigms. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyte, 161–196.Google Scholar
  52. Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory. Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Book ms., Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  53. Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur (1990). Íslensk orðhlutafræði. Kennslukver handa nemendum á háskólastigi. Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
  54. Ross, John (1980). Ikonismus in der Phraseologie, Zeitschrift für Semiotik 2, 39–56.Google Scholar
  55. Sauerland, Uli (1996). The Late Insertion of Germanic Inflection. Generals paper, MIT.Google Scholar
  56. Shapiro, Michael (1969). Aspects of Russian Morphology. Cambridge, Mass.: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Spencer, Andrew (2003). A Realizational Approach to Case. In: M. Butt and T.H. King (eds.) Proceedings of the LFGO3 Conference. Stanford University: CSLI Publications, 87–401.Google Scholar
  58. Stump, Gregory (2001). Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Thráinsson, Höskuldur (1994). Icelandic. In: E. König and J. van der Auwera (eds.) The German Lanuages. London: Routledge, 142–189.Google Scholar
  60. Trommer, Jochen (1999). Morphology Consuming Syntax’ Resources. In: Procceedings of the ESSLI Workshop on Resource Logics and Minimalist Grammars. University of Nijinegen.Google Scholar
  61. Trommer, Jochen (2003). Feature (Non-)Insertion in a Minimalist Approach to Spellout. In: The Main Session. Papers from the 39th Meeting. Vol. 1. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  62. Wiese, Bernd (1996). Iconicity and Syncretism. On Pronominal Inflection in Modern German. In: R. Sackmann (ed.) Theoretical Linguistics and Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 323–344.Google Scholar
  63. Wiese, Bernd (1999). Unterspezifizierte Paradigmen. Form und Funktion in der pronominalen Deklination, Linguistik Online 4. (www.linguistik-online.de/3_99).Google Scholar
  64. Wiese, Bernd (2001). Zur lateinischen Deklination: Die Form-Funktions-Beziehung. Ms., IDS Mannheim.Google Scholar
  65. Wiese, Bernd (2003). Categories and Paradigms: On Underspecification in Russian Declension. Ms., IDS Mannheim. To appear in G. Müller, L. Gunkel and G. Zifonun (eds.) Explorations in Nominal Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  66. Williams, Edwin (1994). Remarks on Lexical Knowledg. Lingua 92, 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wunderlich, Dieter (1997). Cause and the Structure of Verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 27–68.Google Scholar
  68. Wunderlich, Dieter (2002). Is There Any Need for the Concept of Directional Syncretism?. Ms., Universität Dusseldorf. To appear in L. Gunkel, G. Müller and G. Zifonun (eds.) Explorations in Nominal Inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  69. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich (1984). Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit Berlin: Akademie Verla.Google Scholar
  70. Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich (1987). Paradigmenstrukturbedingungen: Aufbau und Veränderung von Flexionsparadigmen. In: W.U. Wurzel (ed.) Studien zur Morphologie und Phonologie II. Number 156 in ‘Linguistische Studien, Reihe A: Arbeitsberichte’. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, Zentralinstitut für Sprachwissenschaf.Google Scholar
  71. Zwicky, Arnold (1970). Class Complements in Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 1, 262–264.Google Scholar
  72. Zwicky, Arnold (1991). Systematic versus Accidental Phonological Identity. In: F. Plank (ed.) Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection. Mouton de Gruyter, 113–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gereon Müller
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für LinguistikUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations