Controlling Transgene Escape in Genetically Modified Grasses

  • Hong Luo
  • Qian Hu
  • Kimberly Nelson
  • Chip Longo
  • Albert P. Kausch
Part of the Developments in Plant Breeding book series (DIPB, volume 11)

Abstract

Trait improvement of turfgrass through genetic engineering is important to the turfgrass industry and the environment. However, the possibility of transgene escape to wild and non-transformed species raises commercial and ecological concerns. Male sterility provides an effective way for interrupting gene flow. We have designed and synthesized two chimeric gene constructs consisting of a rice tapetum-specific promoter (TAP) fused to either a ribonuclease gene barnase, or the antisense of a rice tapetum-specific gene rts. Both constructs were linked to the bar gene for selection by resistance to the herbicide glufosinate. Using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, we have successfully introduced those gene constructs into creeping bentgrass (cv Penn-A-4), producing a total of 219 stably transformed individual events. Tapetum-specific expression of barnase or antisense rts gene did not affect the vegetative phenotype compared with the control plants, and male-sterile flowers were obtained with both constructs. Microscopic studies confirmed the failure of mature pollen formation in male-sterile transgenics. Mendelian segregation of herbicide tolerance and male sterility has been observed in T1 progeny derived from crosses with wild-type plants. Male sterility in transgenic grasses provides the best tool to evaluate gene flow in genetically modified perennial plants and should facilitate the application of genetic engineering in producing environmentally responsible grasses with enhanced traits.

Keywords

antisense barnase gene flow male sterility perennial grasses tapetum-specific promoter transgene escape turfgrass 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altieri MA (2000) The ecological impacts of transgenic crops on agroecosystem health. Ecosystem Health 6: 13–23.Google Scholar
  2. Belanger FC, Meagher TR, Day PR, Plumley K, Meyer WA (2003) Interspecific hybridization between Agrostis stolonifera and related Agrostis species under field conditions. Crop Sci. 43: 240–246.Google Scholar
  3. Dale PJ (1992) Spread of engineered genes to wild relatives. Plant Physiol. 100: 13–15.Google Scholar
  4. Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes EMG (2002) Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 567–574.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniell H (2002) Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 581–586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. De Block M, Debrouwer D, Moens T (1997) The development of nuclear male sterility system in wheat: expression of the barnase gene under the control of tapetum specific promoters. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eastham K, Sweet J (2002) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): the significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. European Environment Agency, Denmark.Google Scholar
  8. Ellatrand NC, Hoffman CA (1990) Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes. Bioscience 40: 438–442.Google Scholar
  9. Ellstrand NC, Prentice HC, Hancock JF. (1999). Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 539–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gatz C (1997) Chemical control of gene expression. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 89–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gatz C, Lenk I (1998) Promoters that respond to chemical inducers. Trend. Plant Sci. 3: 322–328.Google Scholar
  12. Goetz M, Godt DE, Guivarch A, Kahmann U, Chriqui D, Roitsch T (2001) Induction of male sterility in plants by metabolic engineering of the carbohydrate supply. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 6522–6527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanson DD, Hamilton DA, Travis JL, Bashe DM, Mascarenhas JP (1989) Characterization of a pollen-specific cDNA clone from Zea mays and its expression. Plant Cell 1: 173–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartley RW (1988) Barnase and Barstar: expression of its cloned inhibitor permits expression of a cloned ribonuclease. J Mol Biol 202: 913–915.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 6: 271–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA (1983) A binary vector strategy based on separation of vir- and T-region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid. Nature 303: 179–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffman CA (1990) Ecological risks of genetic engineering of crop plants. BioScience 40: 434–437.Google Scholar
  18. Jagannath A, Bandyopadhyay P, Arumugam N, Gupta V, Kumar P, Pental D (2001) The use of spacer DNA fragment insulates the tissue-specific expression of a cytotoxic gene (barnase) and allows high-frequency generation of transgenic male sterile lines in Brassica juncea L. Mol. Breed. 8: 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansen DA (1940) Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Lee J-Y, Aldemita RR, Hodges TK (1996) Isolation of a tapetum-specific gene and promoter from rice. Int. Rice Res. Newsl. 21: 2–3.Google Scholar
  21. Luo H, Hu Q, Nelson K, Kausch AP (2003a) FLP-mediated site-specific DNA recombination in the cells of grasses. Plant Sci. (submitted).Google Scholar
  22. Luo H, Hu Q, Nelson K, Longo C, Kausch AP, Chandlee JM, Wipff JK, Fricker CR (2003) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated creeping bentgrass transformation using phosphinothricin selection results in high frequency of single-copy transgene integration. Plant Cell Rep. (in press).Google Scholar
  23. Luo H, Kausch AP (2002) Application of FLP/FRT site-specific DNA recombination system in plants. In: Genetic Engineering, Principles and Methods, Setlow JK (ed.), Vol 24, pp.1–16. Kluwer Academic/Pleum Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Luo H, Lyznik LA, Gidoni D, Hodges TK (2000) FLP-mediated recombination for use in hybrid plant production. Plant J. 23: 423–430.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Luo H, Van Coppenolle B, Seguin M, Boutry M (1995) Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism and phylogenetic relationship in Hevea brasiliensis. Mol Breed 1: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mariani C, De Beuckeleer M, Truettner J, Leemans J, Goldberg RB (1990) Induction of male sterility in plants by a chimeric ribonuclease gene. Nature 347: 737–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moffatt B, Somerville C (1988) Positive selection for male-sterile mutants of Arabidopsis lacking adenine phosphoribosyl transferase activity. Plant Physiol. 86: 1150–1154.Google Scholar
  28. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plantarum 15: 473–497.Google Scholar
  29. Ow DW, Medberry SL (1995) Genome manipulation through site-specific recombination. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 14: 239–261.Google Scholar
  30. Rogers HJ, Parkes HC (1995) Transgenic plants and the environment. J. Exp. Bot. 46: 467–488.Google Scholar
  31. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Scott R, Hodge R, Paul W, Draper J (1991) The Molecular biology of anther differentiation. Plant Sci. 80: 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shimizu-Sato S, Huq Enamul, Tepperman JM, Quail PH (2002) A light-switchable gene promoter system. Nat. Biotechnol. 20: 1041–1044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Theerakulpisut P, Xu H, Sipgh MB, Pettitt JM, Knox RB (1991) Isolation and developmental expression of Bcpl, an anther-specific cDNA clone in Brassica campestris. Plant Cell 3: 1073–1084.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsuchiya T, Toriyama K, Yoshikawa M, Ejiri S, Hinata K (1995) Tapetum-specific expression of the gene for an endo-β-1,3-glucanase causes male sterility in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol. 36: 487–494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Twell D, Wing R, Yamaguchi J, McCormick S (1989) Isolation and expression of an anther-specific gene from tomato. Mol. Gen. Genet. 217: 240–245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiff JK, Fricker C (2000) Determining gene flow of ransgenic creeping bentgrass and gene transfer to other bentgrass species. Diversity 16: 36–39.Google Scholar
  38. Wipff JK, Fricker C (2001) Gene flow from transgenic creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) in the Willamette valley, Oregon. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 9: 224–242.Google Scholar
  39. Xu H, Knox RB, Taylor PE, Singh MB (1995a) Bcp1, a gene required for male fertility in Arabidopsis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 2106–2110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu H, Theerakulpisut P, Taylor PE, Knox RB, Singh MB, Bhalla PL (1995b) Isolation of a gene preferentially expressed in mature anthers of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Protoplasma 187: 27–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zou JT, Zhan XY, Wu HM, Wang H, Cheung AY (1994) Characterization of a rice pollen-specific gene and its expression. Am. J. Bot. 81: 552–561.Google Scholar
  42. Zuo J, Niu Q-W, Chua N-H (2000) An estrogen receptor-based transactivator XVE mediates highly inducible gene expression in transgenic plants. Plant J. 24: 265–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hong Luo
    • 1
  • Qian Hu
    • 1
  • Kimberly Nelson
    • 1
  • Chip Longo
    • 1
  • Albert P. Kausch
    • 1
  1. 1.HybriGene Inc.West KingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations