The Work of the National Writing Project: Social Practices in a Network Context

  • Ann Lieberman
  • Diane Wood


The National Writing Project the oldest and probably the most successful professional development project in the U.S. now has sites in every state in the U.S. Their work is best understood by realizing that this network is tied together by a set of integrated social practices that connect intellectual work and relationships into a vibrant professional community. The loose structure of a national network with its local sites and the social practices that model its ways of working and leading make this an important example of scaling down (providing a model to be organized locally) in order to scale up (spreading the model to a larger constituency). How this looks is explicated by a study of two sites, an evolving site (6 years old) and a mature site (24 years old). Each holds the core values of the Writing Project even as they adapt certain practices to the differences in context.


Professional Development Social Practice Professional Learning Special Interest Group Professional Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Academy for Educational Development (2000). First of three year study on the National Writing Project. New York.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J. (2000). Teacher networks in practice: Taking charge of curriculum implementation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. (in press) Beyond Certainty: Taking an Inquiry Stance on Practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (eds.), Teachers Caught in the Action: Professional Development that Matters. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gray, J. (2000). Teachers at the center: A memoir of the early years of the National Writing Project. Berkeley, CA: The National Writing Project.Google Scholar
  5. Grossman, P. & Wineburg, S. (forthcoming) In Pursuit of Community, paper to be published by the Teachers College Record Google Scholar
  6. Lieberman, A. & Grolnick, M. (1996). Networks and Reform in American Education Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record, 98(1), 145.Google Scholar
  7. Lieberman, A. & McLaughlin, M. W. (1992). Networks for educational change: powerful and problematic. Phi Delta Kappan 73(9), 673–677.Google Scholar
  8. Lieberman, A. & Wood, D.R. (2003). Inside the National Writing Project: Network Learning and Classroom Teaching: A New Synthesis. New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
  9. McDonald, J. (1996). Redesigning Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. McLaughlin, M.W. & Talbert, J. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning. Palo Alto, Ca.: Context Center on Secondary School Teaching.Google Scholar
  11. Smith, F. (1996). Between Hope and Havoc. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  12. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Westheimer, J. (1998). Among schoolteachers: Community, autonomy, and ideology in teachers’ work. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Wood, D.R. & Lieberman, A. (2000). Teachers as authors: the National Writing Project’s approach to professional development. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 3(3), 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Lieberman
  • Diane Wood

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations