Virtual Geographies of Educational Change: The More Complex the Problems the Simpler the Answers

  • Juana M. Sancho


Virtual geographies connect the power of computer and other technologies to defeat the tyranny of time and space. Virtual geographies also exclude outsiders raising the problem of the digital divide. This chapter addresses this issue from both a technological and educational perspective; and does not forget the large economic interest of ICT corporations. ICT is fully implemented in our society, and as other information and communication artefacts and systems will be here for a long time, and people will have to learn and use it in their daily lives. However, ICT per se is not an educational technology, but even more, if removed from sound educational approaches is far from being the kind of technology needed to meet current and future educational needs and challenges.


Educational Technology Digital Technology Digital Divide Educational Change School Improvement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Àlvarez et al. (1993). Tecnología en acción. Barcelona: Rap.Google Scholar
  2. Andrieu, A. (l986). La informática en la escuela francesa: 15 años de balbuceos. Cuadernos de Educación y Nuevas Tecnologías de la Información, 6–7, pp. 9–15Google Scholar
  3. Archer, J. (2000). The Link to Higher Scores. In vv.aa. Technology and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Bary, J. B. (1932). The Idea of Progress. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, H. J. (1990). Computer use in United States Schools: 1989 An initial report of U. S. participation in the I. E. A. Communication presented at AERA Congress. Boston.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, D. (1972). The coming of the post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Beynon, J. y Mackay, H. (1993). Compuers into Classrooms. More Questions Than Answers. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  8. Breton, P. (1993). Informática y utopía. Cuatro Semanas y Le Monde Doplomatique, Año 1,9, pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
  9. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, Ma.: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Castells, M. (1997). The Power of Identity. Cambridge, Ma.: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennuim. Cambridge, Ma.: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, D (1992). An Epistemic Analysis of the Interaction between Knowledge, Education, and Technology. In E. Barrett (Ed.) Sociomedia. Multimedia, Hypermedia and the Social Construction of Knowledge. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, J. et al. (1999). Teaching and Learning with Multimedia. London: Routlege.Google Scholar
  15. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and Underused. Computers in Classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and Machines. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  17. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1990. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. De Sélys, G. (1998). La escuela, gran mercado. Un sueño enloquecido. Le Monde Diplomatique, june/july, pp. 28–29.Google Scholar
  19. Delval, J. (1986). Niños y máquinas. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
  20. ERT (1997). Investir dans la connaissance. L’intégration de la technologie dans l’éducation européenne. Bruxelles: ERT.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission (1996). Accomplishing Europe through Education and Training. Brussels: Study Group on Education and Training. European Commission. DG XII.Google Scholar
  22. Feenberg, A. (1991). The Critical Theory of Technology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Franklin, C y Kinnell, S.K. (1990). Hypertext/Hypermedia in Schools. A Resource Book. San Francisco, CA: ACB-CLIO.Google Scholar
  24. Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York; Teachers College.Google Scholar
  25. Gates, B. et al. (1995). The Road Ahead. VikingGoogle Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1998). The third way. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hanna, D. E. & Ass. (2000). Higher Education in the Era of Digital Competition. Choices and Challenges. Madison, Wisconsin: Atwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Hargreaves, A. (2002). Sustainability of Educational Change: The Role of Social Geographies. Journal of Educational Change, 3/3–4, pp. 189–214.Google Scholar
  29. Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology. New York: Harper Books.Google Scholar
  30. House, E. R. (1974). The Politics of Educational Innovation. San Francisco: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  31. Kozman, R. B. (2003). Technology, Innovation, and Educational Change-A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: ISTEGoogle Scholar
  32. Krendl, K. A. y Lieberman, D. A. (1988). Computers and Learning: A Review of Recent Research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4,4. pp. 367–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lajoie, S. P. (1993). Computer Environments as Cognitive Tools for Enhancing Learing. In S. P. Lajoie y S. J. Derry (Eds.). Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assaociates, Pu.Google Scholar
  34. Lamb, J. A. (1992). Multimedia and the Teaching-Learning Process in Highger Education. In M. J. Albright & D. L. Graf (Eds.) Teaching in the Information Technology Age: The Role of Educational Technology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Larraín, V., Sancho, J. M., Hernández, F. et al. (2003). Educational Approach Development Report. Information Society Technology Program.Google Scholar
  36. Macdonalds, B. (1992). Microworlds and real worlds-and agenda for evaluation. In J. M. Sancho (Ed.) European Conference about Information Technology in Education: a critical insight. Proccedings. Vol. I. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  37. Mandinach, E. B. and Cline, H. F. (2000). It Won’t Happen Soon: Practical, Curricular, and Methodological Problems in Implementing Technology-Based Constructivist Approaches. In En S. P. Lajoie (Ed.) Computers as cognitive tools, volume two: no more walls. Theory change, paradigm shifts, and their influence on the use of computers for instructional. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. McClintock, R. (2000). Prácticas pedagógicas emergentes. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 290. Pp. 74–77.Google Scholar
  39. McKensey et al. (1997). The Future of Information Technology y UK Schools. London: McKensey and Company.Google Scholar
  40. McLuhan, M. & McLuhan E. (1988). Laws of media: the new science. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Mooij, T. y Smeets, E. (2001). Modeling and supporting ICT implementation in secundary schools. Computers in Education, 36/3, pp. 265–281.Google Scholar
  42. OECD (2001). Learning to Change embracing: ICT at Schools. París: OCDE.Google Scholar
  43. Office of Standards in Education (2001). ICT in Schools, the impact of government iniciatives. London: OFSTED. Google Scholar
  44. Oppenheimer, T. (1997). The computer delusion. The Atlantic Monthly. New York, july.Google Scholar
  45. Papert, S. (1979). Computers and learning. In M. L. Dertouzos and J. Moses (Eds.) The Computer Age: A twenty-year view. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT.Google Scholar
  46. Papert, S. (1979). Computers and learning. In M. L. Dertouzos and J. Moses (Eds.) The Computer Age: A twenty-year view. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT.Google Scholar
  47. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  48. Papert, S. (1993). The Children’s Machine: rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  49. Papert, S. (1996) The connected family: bridging the digital generation gap. Atlanta, Ga: Longstreet Press.Google Scholar
  50. Pelgrum, W. J y Plomp, T. (1993) The IEA Study of Computers in Education: Implementation of an Innovation in 21 Education Systems. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  51. Pelgrum, W. J y Plomp, T. (1991). The use of computers in education worldwide. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  52. Postman, N. (1996). The End of Education. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  53. Reich, R. (2001). The Future of Success. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  54. Ringstaff, C. and Kelley, L. (2002). The Learning Return on Our Educational Technology Investment. A Review of Findings from Research. WestEd improving education through research, development and learning.Google Scholar
  55. Rivière, P. (1998). Los negocios del multimedia en la escuela. Le Monde Diplomatique, April, pp. 27–28. (Versión española).Google Scholar
  56. Salomon, G. (1981). Interactive Media, Cognition and Learning. Jossey-Bass Publishers. (r)Google Scholar
  57. Salomon, G. (1990). Studying the flute and the orchestra: controlled vs. classroom research on computers. Instructional Media and Technology Research, 521–531.Google Scholar
  58. Sancho J. M. (1992). Los profesores y el currículo. Barcelona: Horsori.Google Scholar
  59. Sancho J. M. (1999). ¿Tecnologías de la Información o Tecnologías de la Información?. Revista Educar, 25, 205–228.Google Scholar
  60. Sancho, J. M. (2003). 2nd European conference on Information Technology in Education and Citizenship: a critical insight. Education, Communication and Information 3/3, pp. 281–286.Google Scholar
  61. Searle, J. R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  62. Seattle, P. (1990). The Evolution of American Educational Technology. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.Google Scholar
  63. Self, J. (1985). Microcomputers in Education: A Critical Appraisal of Educational Software. Brighton: The Haverster Press.Google Scholar
  64. Selfe, C. L. (1999). Technology and Literacy in the Twenty-First Century. The Importance of Paying Attention. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Steingerg, Sh. R. and Kincheloe, J. L. (Eds.) (1997). Kinderculture: the corporate construction of childhood. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  66. Stoll, L. and Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Straker, A. (1986). A sorry state of affairs. The Times Educational Suplement, 9 de mayo.Google Scholar
  68. Tapscott, D. (2000). Digital Divide. In vv.aa. Technology and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  69. Tedesco, J. C. (1995). El nuevo pacto educativo. Madrid: Anaya.Google Scholar
  70. Thompson, A. D. et al. (1992). Educational Technology. A Review of the Research. Washington, DC: AECT.Google Scholar
  71. Tyack, D. y Tobin, W. (1994). The “Grammar” of schooling: Why Has it Been so Hard to Change?. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 31/3, pp. 453–480.Google Scholar
  72. United States Department of Education (1996). Getting America’s Students Ready for the 21st Century
  73. Vygotsky (1979). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juana M. Sancho

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations