Advertisement

The Soul-Body Union and Sexual Difference from Descartes to Merleau-Ponty and Beauvoir

  • Sara Heinämaa
Part of the The New Synthese Historical Library book series (SYNL, volume 55)

Keywords

Sexual Difference Sexual Identity Sense Experience Living Body Detailed Argument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alanen, L. “Descartes and Elisabeth: A philosophical dialogue.” Unpublished manuscript, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Alanen, L. Descartes’s Concept of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. Beauvoir, S. de. Le deuxième sexe I: Les faits et les mythes. Paris: Gallimard, 1949a/1993. (In English The Second Sex, trans. and ed. H.M. Parshley. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987.)Google Scholar
  4. Beauvoir, S. de. Le deuxième sexe II: L’expérience vécue Paris: Gallimard, 1949b/1991. (In English The Second Sex, trans. and ed. H.M. Parshley. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987.)Google Scholar
  5. Benhabib, S. “Epistemologies of postmodernism: A rejoinder to Jean-François Lyotard.” In L.J. Nicholson (ed.): Feminism/Postmodernism. New York and London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. Benhabib, S. Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. London, New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London, New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. Descartes, R. Descartes René AT: Œuvres de Descartes, eds. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery, revised edition, Paris: Vrin/C.N.R.S., [1964–1976] 1996. (In English CSM and CSM-K The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984–1991.)Google Scholar
  9. Diprose, R. The Bodies of Women: Ethics, Embodiment and Sexual Difference. London, New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. Gatens, M. Imagining Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. Grosz, E. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. Heinämaa, S. “Woman-nature, product, style?” In L. Hankinson Nelson and J. Nelson (eds.): Feminism, Science and the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 1996.Google Scholar
  13. Heinämaa, S. “What is a woman? Butler and Beauvoir on the foundations of the sexual difference.” Hypatia, 12:1, 1997, pp.20–39.Google Scholar
  14. Heinämaa, S. “Wonder and (sexual) difference: Cartesian radicalism in phenomenological thinking.” In T. Aho & M. Yrjönsuuri (eds.): Norms and Modes of Thinking in Descartes. Acta Philosophica Fennica 64. Helsinki, 1999.Google Scholar
  15. Heinämaa, S. “From decisions to passions: Merleau-Ponty’s interpretation of Husserl’s reduction.” In T. Toadvine & L. Embree (eds.): Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. Heinämaa, S. “The living body and its position in metaphysics: Merleau-Ponty’s dialogue with Descartes.” In Dan Zahavi, Sara Heinämaa, and Hans Ruin (eds.): Metaphysics, Facticity, Interpretation: Phenomenology in the Nordic Countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003a.Google Scholar
  17. Heinämaa, S. Towards a Phenomenology of Sexual Difference: Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Beauvoir. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003b.Google Scholar
  18. Hekman, S. Gender and Knowledge: Elements of a Postmodern Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  19. Husserl, E. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Husserliana IV. Ed. M. Bimel. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1952. (In English Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to Phenomenological Philosophy, Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution, trans. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer, Dordrecht, Boston,London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.)Google Scholar
  20. Irigaray, L. 1984. Éthique la différence sexuelle, Paris: Minuit, 1984. (In English An Ethics of Sexual Difference, trans. C. Burke and G. C. Gill. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.)Google Scholar
  21. James, S. Passions and Actions: The Emotions in the Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  22. Lloyd, G.: Part of Nature: Self-Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  23. Merleau-Ponty, M. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945/1993. (In English Phenomenology of Perception, trans. by C. Smith. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1995.)Google Scholar
  24. Merleau-Ponty, M. Sens et non-sens. Paris: Gallimard, 1947/1995. (In English Sense and Non-Sense. Trans. by H. L. Dreyfus & P. A. Dreyfus. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964.)Google Scholar
  25. Merleau-Ponty, M. La Nature: Notes cours du Collège de France. Ed. by D. Séglard. Paris: Seuil, 1968/1994.Google Scholar
  26. Merleau-Ponty, M. L’union de l’âme et du corps: Chez Malbranche, Biran et Bergson, Notes prises au cours de Maurice Merleau-Ponty à l’École Normale Supérieure (1947–1948). Ed. by J. Deprun. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1997. (In English The Incarnate Subject: Malebranche, Brian, and Bergson on the Union of Body and Soul, trans. by P. B. Milan. Ed. A. G. Bjelland Jr. and P. Burke. New York: Humanity Books, 2001.)Google Scholar
  27. Reuter, M. “Questions of sexual difference and equality in Descartes’ philosophy.” In T. Aho & M. Yrjönsuuri (eds.): Norms and Modes of Thinking in Descartes. Acta Philosophica Fennica 64. Helsinki, 1999.Google Scholar
  28. Reuter, M. Questions of the Body, Sexual Difference and Equality in Cartesian Philosophy, Doctoral dissertation. Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki, 2000.Google Scholar
  29. Reuter, M. “Tensions and continuity: Merleau-Ponty on the history of philosophy.” Paper presented in the First Annual Meeting of the Nordic Society for Phenomenology, Helsinki, April 25–27, 2003.Google Scholar
  30. Reuter, M. “Psychologizing Cartesian doubt: Feminist reading strategies and the ‘unthought’ of philosophy.” In this volume, 2004.Google Scholar
  31. Shapiro, L. «Élisabeth et Descartes: La maladie, le remède et la nature féminine.» In E. Beranger, G. Castro, & M.-L. Paoli (eds.): Femme et nature. Bordeaux: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme d’Aquitaine, 1997.Google Scholar
  32. Shapiro, L. “Cartesian generosity.” In T. Aho & M. Yrjönsuuri (eds.): Norms and Modes of Thinking in Descartes. Acta Philosophica Fennica 64. Helsinki, 1999a.Google Scholar
  33. Shapiro, L. “Princess Elisabeth and Descartes: The union of soul and body and the practice of philosophy.” In G. Lloyd (ed.): Feminism and History of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999b/2002.Google Scholar
  34. Toadvine, T. “Merleau-Ponty’s reading of Husserl.” In T. Toadvine & L. Embree (eds.): Merleau-Ponty’s Reading of Husserl. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer, 2002.Google Scholar
  35. Tollefsen, D. “Princess Elisabeth and the problem of mind-body interaction.” Hypatia 14:3, 1999, 59–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Heinämaa
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations