Advertisement

Research on Statistical Literacy, Reasoning, and Thinking: Issues, Challenges, and Implications

  • Joan Garfield
  • Dani Ben-Zvi

Summary

This book focuses on one aspect of the “infancy” of the field of statistics education research, by attempting to grapple with the definitions, distinctions, and development of statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking. As this field grows, the research studies in this volume should help provide a strong foundation as well as a common research literature. This is an exciting time, given the newness of the research area and the energy and enthusiasm of the contributing researchers and educators who are helping to shape the discipline as well as the future teaching and learning of statistics. We point out that there is room for more participants to help define and construct the research agenda and contribute to results. We hope to see many new faces at future gatherings of the international research community, whether at SRTL-4, or 5, or other venues such as the International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS), International Congresson Mathematical Education (ICME), and the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME).

Keywords

Technological Tool Statistical Reasoning Statistical Literacy Statistical Thinking International Statistical Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakker, A. (2002). Route-type and landscape-type software for learning statistical data analysis. In B. Phillips (Chief Ed.), Developing a Statistically Literate Society: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Voorburg, The Netherlands (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
  2. Batanero, C., Garfield, J., Ottaviani, M. G., and Truran, J. (2000). Research in statistical education: Some priority questions. Statistical Education Research Newsletter, 1(2), 2–6.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Zvi, D.(2000). Toward understanding therole of technological tools in statistical learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(1&2), 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bryce, G. B. (2002). Undergraduate statistics education: An introduction and review of selected literature. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(2). Retrieved June 23, 2003 from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n2/bryce.html
  6. Chance, B. L. (2002). Components of statistical thinking and implications for instruction and assessment. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3). Retrieved April 7, 2003, from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/
  7. Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Fong G. T., Krantz, D. H., & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friel, S. N. (in press). The research frontier: Where technology interacts with the teaching and learning of data analysis and statistics. In M. K. Heid & G. W. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Syntheses and perspectives, vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Gal, I., & Garfield, J. B. (Eds.). (1997). The assessment challenge in statistics education. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Garfield, J. B., & Burrill, G. (Eds.). (1997). Research on the role of technology in teaching and learning statistics. In Proceedings of the 1996 IASE Round Table Conference, Granada, Spain. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Garfield, J., & Gal, I. (1999). Teaching and assessing statistical reasoning. In L. V. Stiff (Ed.), Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12 (NCTM 1999 Yearbook), pp. 207–219. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  14. Joliffe, F. (1998). What is research in statistical education? In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. Seu Kea, T. Wee Kee, & W. K. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, pp. 801–806. Singapore: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. A. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Lajoie, S. P. (Ed.). (1998). Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessment in grades K-12. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, C., Zeleke, A., & Wachtel, H. (2002). Where do students get lost? The concept of variation. In B. Phillips (Chief Ed.), Developing a Statistically Literate Society: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg: The Netherlands (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
  20. Lesh, R. (2002). Research design in mathe matics education: Focusing ondesignexperiments.In L. English (Ed.), International Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Mokros, J., & Russell, S. J. (1995). Children’s concepts of a verage and representativeness. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore, D. (1998). Statistics among the liberal arts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 1253–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  24. Nisbett, R. (1993). Rules for reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The originof the idea of chance inchildren. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  26. Rubin, A., Bruce, B., & Tenney, Y. (1991). Learning about sampling: Trouble at the core of statistics. In D. Vere-Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Statistics, vol. 1 (pp. 314–319). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Russell, S. J., & Mokros, J. (1996). What do children understand about average? Teaching Children Mathematics, 2, 360–364.Google Scholar
  28. Schau, C., & Mattern, N. (1997). Assessing students’ connected understanding of statistical relationships. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education (pp.91–104). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sedlmeier, P. (1999). Improving statistical reasoning: Theoretical models and practical implications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Utts, J. (2003). What educated citizens should know about statistics and probability. The American Statistician, 57(2), 74–79.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and socio-mathematical norms. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), Emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 163–201). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Wiggins, G. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wisenbaker, J., & Scott, J. (1997). Modelingaspectsofstudents’attitudes and achievement in introductory statistics courses. Paper presented at AERA Annual Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
  36. Wild, C., Triggs, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1997). Assessment on abudget: Using traditional methods imaginatively. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The Assessment Challenge in Statistics Education. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan Garfield
    • 1
  • Dani Ben-Zvi
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaUSA
  2. 2.University of HaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations