Accorsi, R., Apostolakis, G. E., Zio, E., 1999a, Prioritizing stakeholder concerns in environmental risk management. Journal of Risk Research, 2, 1, 11–29.Google Scholar
Accorsi, R., Zio, E., Apostolakis, G. E., 1999b, Developing Utility Functions for Environmental Decision-Making. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 34, 4, 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Rashdan, D., Al-Kloub, B., Dean, A., Al-Shemmeri, T., 1999, Theory and Methodology Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan., European Journal of Operational Research, 118 (1999) 30–45.Google Scholar
Ananda, J. and Herath, G., 2003, Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: a value function approach. Ecological Economics, 45, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apostolakis, G. E., 2001, Assessment and Management of Environmental Risks, Editors: I. Linkov and J. Palma-Oliveira, 211–220. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Arvai, J. and Gregory, R., 2003, Testing Alternative Decision Approaches for Identifying Cleanup Priorities at Contaminated Sites. Environmental Science & Technology 37:8, 1469–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, D., Bridges, D., Hunter, R., Johnson, G., Krupa, J., Murphy, J., Sorenson, K., 2001, Guidebook to Decision-Making Methods. Developed for the Department of Energy. WSRC-IM-2002-00002.
Bardos, P., Lewis, A., Nortcliff, S., Matiotti, C., Marot, F., Sullivan, T., 2002, CLARINET report: Review of Decision Support Tools for Contaminated Land Management, and their use in Europe. Published by Austrian Federal Environment Agency, on behalf of CLARINET.
Bell, M., Hobbs, B.F, Ellis, H., 2003, The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in the integrated assessment of climate change: implications for IA practitioners. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37 (2003) 289–316.Google Scholar
Belton, Valerie and Steward, Theodor. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis An Integrated Approach.
Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, 2002Google Scholar
Bonano, E. J., Apostolakis, G. E., Salter, P. F., Ghassemi, A., Jennings, S., 2000, Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental remediation alternatives. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 71, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, U., Davey, A. M., Olson, D. L., 1997, Multi-attribute utility methods in Group Decision Making: Past applications and potential for inclusion in GDSS. Omega, International Journal of Management Sciences, 25, 6, 691–706.Google Scholar
Brown, B., Neil Adger, W., Tompkins, E., Bacon, P. Shim, D. Young, K., 2001. Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management. Ecological Economics. 37 (2001) 417–434.Google Scholar
Cole, R. A., and Feather, T. D., 2002, Improving watershed planning and management through integration: a critical review of federal opportunities. Prepared for U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute of Water Resources by of Planning and Management Consultants, Ltd. Contract # DACW72-99-D-0005, Task Order #61.
Corporate Project 7 Team, April 2003a, Assessment Report. Corporate Project 7: A cleanup program driven by risk-based end states, U. S. DOE.
Corporate Project 7 Team, August 2003b,Implementation Plan — U. S. Department of Energy Policy 455.1: Use of risk-based end states. Presented to the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management, U. S. DOE.
Deschaine, L. M., Breslau, B., Ades, M. J., Selg, R. A., Saaty, T. L., 1998, Decision Support Software to Optimize Resource Allocation — Theory and Case History. The Society for Computer Simulation — Simulators International XV, 139–144.Google Scholar
Diwekar U. and Small M.J., 2002, Process analysis approach to industrial ecology, Chapter 11 in A Handbook of Industrial Ecology, R.U. Ayres and L.W. Ayres, eds., Edward Elgar Ltd, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 114–137.Google Scholar
DOE, April 1998, Guidelines for Risk-based Prioritization of DOE Activities. U.S. Department of Energy. DOE-DP-STD-3023-98.
DOE, 2003, Policy DOE P 455.1 — Subject: Use of risk-based end states. Initiated by Office of Environmental Management, U. S. DOE.
Dortch, M. S. (U. S. Army Research and Development Center), 2001, Army Risk Assessment Modeling System (ARAMS). Published in Assessment and Management of Environmental Risks: Cost-efficient methods and applications, edited by Igor Linkov and Jose Palma-Oliveira.
Ehrhardt, J., and Shershakov, V. M., 1996, Real-time on-line decision support systems (RODOS) for off-site emergency management following a nuclear accident. European Commission, Ukraine — International scientific collaboration on the consequences of the Chernobyl accident (1991–95).
Florig, H.K., Morgan, M.G., Morgan, K.M., Jenni, K.E., Fischoff, B., Fischbeck, P.S., DeKay, M.L., 2001, A Deliberative Method for Ranking Risks (I): Overview and Test Bed Development. Risk Analysis, Vol., 21, No. 5, 2001.
Focht, W., DeShong, T., Wood, J., Whitaker, K., 1999, A Protocol for the Elicitation of Stakeholders’ Concerns and Preferences for Incorporation into Policy Dialogue. Proceedings of the Third Workshop in the Environmental Policy and Economics Workshop Series: Economic Research and Policy Concerning Water Use and Watershed Management, Washington. 1–24.
French, S., Simpson, L., Atherton, E., Belton, V., Dawes, R., Edwards, W., Hamalainen, R. P., Larichev, O., Lootsma, F., Pearman, A., Vlek, C., 1998, Problem Formulation for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Report of a workshop. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 7, 242–262.Google Scholar
Gal, T., Stewart, T. J., Hanne, T., 1999, Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM models, algorithms, theory, and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Gomez-Limon, J. A., Arriaza, M., Riesgo, L., 2003, An MCDM analysis of agricultural risk aversion. European Journal of Operational Research, Article in Press.
Gregory, R. and Failing, L., 2002, Using Decision Analysis to Encourage Sound Deliberation: Water Use Planning in British Columbia, Canada. Professional Practice, 492–499.
Gregory, R., Fischhoff, B., Thorne, S., Butte, G., 2003, A Multi-Channel Stakeholder Consultation Process for Transmission Deregulation. Energy Policy 31: 1291–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R. and Keeney, R. L., 1994, Creating Policy Alternatives Using Stakeholder Values. Management Science, 40, 8, 1035–1048.Google Scholar
Gregory, R., McDaniels, T., Fields, D., 2001, Decision Aiding, Not dispute resolution: Creating insights through structured environmental decisions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 3, 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R. and Wellman, K, 2001, Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: a community-based estuary case study. Ecological Economics, 39, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grelk, B. J., 1997, A CERCLA-Based Decision Support System for Environmental Remediation Strategy Selection. Department of the Air Force Air University, Air Force Institute of Technology, Thesis.
Grelk, B., Kloeber, J. M., Jackson, J. A., Deckro, R. F., Parnell, G. S., 1998, Quantifying CERCLA using site decision maker values. Remediation, 8(2), 87–105.Google Scholar
Guitouni, A., Martel. J.M., 1998, Tentative Guidelines to Help Choosing an Appropriate MCDA Method. European J. Operations Research, Vol. 109, pp. 501–521.Google Scholar
Hamalainen, R.P., Lindstedt, M., Sinkko, K., 2000, Multi-Attribute Risk Analysis in Nuclear Emergency Management. Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2000, pp. 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamalainen, R. P., Kettunen, E., Ehtamo, H., 2001, Evaluating a framework for Multi-Stakeholder Decision Support in water resources management. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 331–353.Google Scholar
Hamalainen, R., 2003, Reversing the Perspective on the Applications of Decision Analysis. Decision Analysis Publication.
Hartman, D. H. and Goltz, M. N., 2001, Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Select Characterization and Risk-Based Decision-Making and Management Methods for Hazardous Waste Sites, Environ Eng Policy (2002) 1–7.
Hayashi, K., 2000, Multicriteria analysis for agricultural resource management: A critical survey and future perspectives. European Journal of Operational Research 122 (2000) 486–500.Google Scholar
Hobbs, B. F. and Meier, 2000, Energy Decisions and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multicriteria Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Janssen, R., 2001, On the use of Multi-criteria Analysis in Environmental Impact Assessment in the Netherlands. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10, 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenni, K. E., Merkhofer, M. W., Williams, C., 1995, The rise and fall of a risk-based priority system: Lessons from DOE’s Environmental Restoration Priority System. Risk Analysis, 15, 3, 397–410.Google Scholar
Joerin, F, & Musy, A, 2000, Land Management with GIS and Multicriteria Analysis. International Transactions In Operational Research, 7, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangas, J., Kangas, A., Leskinen, P., Pykalainen, J., 2001, MCDM Methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland: Applications and Experiences. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, D., Kirkwood, C.W., Corner, J.L., 2002, Summary of Decision Analysis Applications in the Operations Research Literature, 1990–2001. Technical Report Department of Supply Chain Management, Arizona State University, November 2002
Keefer, D., Kirkwood, C.W., Corner, J.L., 2002, Perspective on Decision Analysis Applications, 1990–2001. Forthcoming in Decision Analysis. Department of Supply Chain Management, Arizona State University
Keisler, J. M. and Sundell, R. C., 1997, Combining Multi-Attribute Utility and Geographic Information for boundary decisions: an application to Park Planning. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 1, 2, 101–118.Google Scholar
Kwak, S. J., Yoo, S. H., Kim, T. Y., 2001, A constructive approach to air-quality valuation in Korea. Ecological Economics, 38, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larichev, O. I. and Olson, D. I., 2001, Multiple Criteria Analysis in Strategic Siting Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Levy, J., Hipel, K., Kilgour, D M., 2000, Using environmental indicators to quantify the robustness of policy alternatives to uncertainty. Ecological Modeling 130 (2000) 79–86.Google Scholar
Linkov, I., Burmistrov, D (2003, in press). Model Uncertainty and Choices Made by Modelers: Lessons Learned from the International Atomic Energy Agency Model Intercomparisons. Risk Analysis.
Macharis, C., Springael, J., DeBrucker, K., Verbeke, A., 2003, PROMETHEE and AHP: The Design of Operational Synergies in Multicriteria Analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE With Ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 1–11.
Males, R. M., 2002, Beyond Expected Value: Making decisions under risk and uncertainty. RMM Technical Services, under contract to Planning and Management Consultants, Ltd. Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources. IWR Report.
Marttunen, M. and Hamalainen, R. P., 1995, Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, 87, 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsatsinis, N. F. and Samaras, A. P., 2001, MCDA and preference disaggregation in group decision support systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 414–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniels, T. L., 1995, Using judgment in Resource Management: a multiple objective analysis of a fisheries management decision. Operations Research, 43, 3, 415–426.Google Scholar
McDaniels, T. L. and Roessler, C., 1998, Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: a constructive approach. Ecological Economics, 27, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniels, T. L., Gregory, R. S., Fields, D., 1999, Democratizing Risk Management: Successful public involvement in local water management decisions. Risk Analysis, 19, 3, 497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miettinen, P., and Hamalainen, R. P., 1997. How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). European Journal of Operational Research, 102(2), 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, G. A., Anderson, A. B. (U.S. Army ERDC), Gertner, G. Z., 2002, Integrating Multi-Criteria Analysis and GIS for Land Condition Assessment: Part 2 — Allocation of Military Training Areas. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 6, 1, 17–30.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G., Florig, H. K., DeKay, M. L., & Fischbeck, P. S. (2000). Categorizing risks for risk ranking. Risk Analysis, 20, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., Atman, C. J., 2002, Risk Communication. Cambridge University Press.
National Research Council. 1999. New Directions in Water Resources Planning for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. National Academy Press. Washington DC.Google Scholar
Parnell, G. S., Frimpon, M., Barnes, J., Kloeber, Jr., J.M., Deckro, R. F., Jackson, J. A., 2001, Safety Risk Analysis of an Innovative Environmental Technology. Risk Analysis 21-1, 143–155.Google Scholar
Pavlikakis, G. E., Tsihrintzis, V. A., 2003, A quantitative method for accounting human opinion, preferences and perceptions in ecosystem management. Journal of Environmental Management, 68, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peer Review Committee of the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP), 1999, Peer Review of the U. S. Department of Energy’s use of risk in its prioritization process.
Pereira, A.G., Quintana, S.C., 2002, From Technocratic to Participatory Decision Support Systems: Responding to the New Governance Initiatives. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis 2002, Vol., 6, No. 2, pp. 95–107.Google Scholar
Peterson, D., Silsbee, D., Schmoldt, D., 1994, A Case Study of Resources Management Planning with Multiple Objectives and Projects. Environmental Management Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 729–742.Google Scholar
Prato, T., 2003, Multiple-attribute evaluation of ecosystem management for the Missouri River system. Ecological Economics, 45, 297–309. Available online at sciencedirect.com.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralston, B. E., Jackson, J. A., Kloeber, Jr., J. M., Deckro, R. F., 1996, Development of a Decision Support System for the Department of Energy’s Selection of Waste Remediation Technologies. Center for Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis Technical Report 96-02, 1–123.
Ramanathan, R., 2001, A note on the use of the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 63, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, H.M., Lloyd, F.T., Loftis, D.L., Twery, M. J., 2000, A practical decision-analysis process for forest ecosystem management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27 (2000) 195–226.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. and Bruen, M., 1998, Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE. European Journal of Operational Research, 107, 542–551.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. and Bruen, M., 1998, A new system for weighting environmental criteria for use within ELECTRE III. European Journal of Operational Research, 107, 552–563.Google Scholar
Schmoldt, D., Mendoza, G.A., Kangas, J., 2001, Past Developments and Future Directions for the AHP in Natural Resources. The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making, 289–305.
Schmoldt, D. L. and Peterson, D. L., 2001a, Efficient Group Decision Making in Workshop Settings. The Analytical Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making, 97–114.
Schmoldt, D., and Peterson, D., 2001b, Strategic and Tactical Planning for Managing National Park Resources. The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making, 67–79.
Schmoldt, D., Peterson, D., Silsbee, D., 1994, Developing Inventory and Monitoring Programs Based on Multiple Objectives. Environmental Management Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 707–727.Google Scholar
Schreck, F., 2002, Multi-Criteria decision aid as a tool in the management of produced water in the offshore Oil Industry. Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Master Thesis.
Seppala, J., Basson, L., Norris, G.A., 2002, Decision Analysis Frameworks for Life-Cycle Impact Assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 5, No. 4., pp. 45–68.Google Scholar
Sharifi, M.A., Van Den Toorn, W., Emmanuel, M., 2002, International Institute for Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation.
Siddiqui, M., Everett, J., Vieux, B., 1996, Landfill Siting Using Geographic Information Systems: A Demonstration. Journal of Environmental Engineering.
Simon, M., and Pascoe, S., 1999, A review of applications of multiple criteria decision-making techniques to fisheries. Marine Resource Economics, 14, 41–63.Google Scholar
Stahl, C. H., Cimorelli, A. J., Chow, A. H., 2002, A new approach to Environmental Decision Analysis: Multi-Criteria Integrated Resource Assessment (MIRA). Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 22, 6, 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, C. H., 2003, Multi-criteria Integrated Resource Assessment (MIRA): A New Decision Analytic Approach to Inform Environmental Policy Analysis. Vol 1. Dissertation submitted to Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Affairs and Public Policy.
Steiguer, J.E., Liberti L., Schuler, A., Hansen, B., 2003. Multi-Criteria Decision Models for Forestry and Natural Resources Management: An Annotated Bibliography. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-307.
Store, R., and Kangas, J., 2001. Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modeling. Landscape and Urban Planning 55 (2001) 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmerman, T. J., Kloeber, Jr., J. M., Jackson, J.A., Deckro, R. F., 1996, Selecting Remediation Technologies Through a ‘Technical Risk’ Index: An Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory. Center for Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis Technical Report 96-01.
Top-to-Bottom Review Team, February 2002, A Review of the Environmental Management Program. Presented to the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management, U. S. DOE.
Tran, L., Knight, C.G., O’Neill, R., Smith, E., Ritters, K., Wickham, J., 2002, Environmental Assessment Fuzzy Decision Analysis for Integrated Environmental Vulnerability Assessment of the Mid-Atlantic Region. Environmental Management Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 845–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2002. Civil Works Program Strategic Plan. (http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/iwr/strategicplan.htm
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2003a. USACE Environmental Operating Principles and Implementation Guidance. (http://www.hq.usace.army.mil/CEPA/7%20Environ%20Prin%20web%20site/Page1.html
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2003b. Planning Civil Works Projects under the Environmental Operating Principles. Circular 1105-2-404. (http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/usace-docs/eng-circulars/ec1105-2-404/entire.pdf
U. S. DOE, Environmental Assessment Division. http://web.ead.anl.gov/resrad/home2/
U. S. EPA, October 2000, Framework for Responsible Environmental Decision-Making (FRED): Using life cycle assessment to evaluate preferability of products. Prepared by Science Applications International Corporation, Research Triangle Institute, EcoSense Inc., Roy F. Weston Inc., Five Winds International. EPA/600/R-00/095.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General, Special Review, 2002. Consistency and Transparency in Determination of EPA’s Anticipated Ozone Designations. Report no. 2002-S-00016.
Vaillancourt, K. and Waaub, J. P., 2002, Environmental site evaluation of waste management facilities embedded into EUGENE model: A multicriteria approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 139, 436–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincke, P., 1992, Multi-Criteria Decision-Aid. John Wiley and Sons.
Wakeman, J. S., 2003 (check?), Decision Analysis based upon implementability of action alternatives at Milltown Dam: Attachment A. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District. (full reference not given. Received as an email attachment)
Wang, T. A., and McTernan, W. F., 2002, The development and application of a multilevel decision analysis model for the remediation of contaminated groundwatcr under uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Management, 64, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werrick, W.J., and Whipple, W, 1994. Managing Water for Drought: National Study of Water Management for Drought. US Army Corps of Engineers — Institute of Water Resources Report (IWR) Report NDS-94-8.
Werrick, W.J., and Whipple, W., and Lund, J., 1996. Basinwide Management of Water in the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa and Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basins: Draft Report. US Army Corps of Engineers — Institute of Water Resources (IWR).
Whitaker, K and Focht, W., 2001, Expert Modeling of Environmental Impacts. OPS Special Issue: Environmental Policy in Oklahoma, 10: 179–186.Google Scholar
Zio, E. and Apostolakis, 1998, Sensitivitiy and Uncertainty Analysis Within A Methodology for Evaluating Environmental Restoration Technologies. N. H. Elsevier, Computer Physics Communications 117 (1999), 1–10.Google Scholar