Semiotics, Compassion and Value-Centered Design

  • Joseph A Goguen
Chapter

Abstract

It is difficult to design systems that satisfy users; failure is common, and even successful designs often overrun time and cost. This motivates user-centered design methods. But users often don’t know what they need or else cannot articulate it (due to tacit knowledge), and also are often not aware of key impacts of organisational context on how they work. This motivates using ethnographic methods. However these can be slower and more expensive, and can still fail. We argue that values are keys to the promise of socially sensitive design. Algebraic semiotics provides a rigorous notation and calculus for representation that is explicitly value sensitive, while compassion supports both better analysis and better ethics in design. Together with discourse-based value discovery methods and iterative design, these enable a method that we call value-centered design; some case studies are discussed.

Key words

Semiotics Ethnomethodology Value-Centred Design Requirement Engineering 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, M. 2000, The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15:pp. 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agre, P. 1995, Institutional Circuitry: Thinking about the Forms and Uses of Information. Information Technologies and Libraries: pp. 225–230.Google Scholar
  3. Bowker, G. 1994, Information Mythology and Infrastructure. In Lisa Bud, Editor, Information Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business, pp. 231–247. Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bowker, G and Star, S, L. 1999, Sorting Things Out. MIT.Google Scholar
  5. Burstall, R. 1991, Computing: Yet Another Reality Construction. In Software Development and Reality Construction. Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Dalai Lama. 1999, Ethics for the New Millenium. Riverhead.Google Scholar
  7. Dourish, P. 2001, The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT.Google Scholar
  8. Fauconnier, G. Turner, M. 1998, Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22, pp. 133–187.Google Scholar
  9. Fauconnier, G. Turner, M. 2002, The Way We Think. Basic.Google Scholar
  10. Garfinkel, H. 1967, Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Goguen, J. 1994, Requirements Engineering as the Reconciliation of Social and Technical Issues. In Marina Jirotka and Joseph Goguen, editors, Requirements Engineering: Social and Technical Issues, pp. 165–200.Google Scholar
  12. Goguen, J. 1996, Formality and Informality in Requirements Engineering. Proceedings, International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 102–108. IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  13. Goguen, J. 1997, Towards A Social, Ethical Theory of Information. In Geoffrey Bowker, Les Gasser, Leigh Star, and William Turner, editors, Social Science Research, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work, pp. 27–56. ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  14. Goguen, J. 1999, An Introduction to Algebraic Semiotics, with Applications to User Interface Design. In Chrystopher Nehaniv, editor, Computation for Metaphors, Analogy and Agents. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Volume 1562, pp. 242–291. Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Goguen, J. 1999, Social and Semiotic Analyses for Theorem Prover User Interface Design. Formal Aspects of Computing, 11:pp. 272–301. Special Issue on User Interfaces for Theorem Provers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goguen, J. 2003, The Ethics of Databases. In Tara McPherson and Nina Wakeford, editors, Confronting Convergence. Erlbaum, to appear.Google Scholar
  17. Goguen, J. 2004, The Reality of Mathematical Objects, In Preparation.Google Scholar
  18. Goguen, J and Harrell, D. 2003, Information Visualization and Semiotic Morphisms. To appear in Multidisciplinary Approaches to Visual Representations and Interpretations, ed. Grant Malcolm. Elsevier. Papers from the Second International Conference on Visual Representations and Interpretations, Liverpool UK, 9–12.Google Scholar
  19. Goguen, J and Lin, K. 2001, Web-Based Support for Cooperative Software Engineering. Annals of Software Engineering, 12:pp. 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goguen, J and Linde, C. 1993, Techniques for Requirements Elicitation. In Stephen Fickas and Anthony Finkelstein, editors, Requirements Engineering’ 93, pp. 152–164. IEEE. Reprinted in Software Requirements Engineering (Second Edition), ed. Richard Thayer and Merlin Dorfman, IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  21. Heidegger, M. 1962, Being and Time. Blackwell. Translation by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson of Sein und Zeit, Niemeyer, 1927.Google Scholar
  22. Heidegger, M. 1977, The Question Concerning Technology and other Essays. Harper and Row. Translated by William Lovitt.Google Scholar
  23. Jayyusi, L. 1991, Values and Moral Judgement: Communicative Praxis as a Moral Order. In Graham Button, editor, Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, pp. 227–251. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, M. 1993, Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Kawakita, J. 1975, KJ Method: a Scientific Approach to Problem Solving. Kawakita Research Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Labov, W. 1972, The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax. Language in the Inner City, pp. 354–396. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  27. Lakoff, G and Johnson, M. 1980, Metaphors we Live by. Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Latour, B. 1987, Science in Action. Open.Google Scholar
  29. Latour, B. 1988, The Pasteurization of France. Harvard.Google Scholar
  30. Nishitani, K. 1982, Religion and Nothingness. University of California. Translated by Jan Van Bragt.Google Scholar
  31. Peirce, C. 1965, Collected Papers of Charles Saunders Peirce. Harvard. In 6 volumes; see especially Volume 2: Elements of Logic.Google Scholar
  32. Rizzolatti, G, Fadiga, L, Gallese, V and Fogassi, L. 1996, Premotor Cortex and The Recognition of Motor Actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, pp. 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robinson, M and Bannon, L. 1991, Questioning Representations. In Mike Robinson, Liam Bannon, and Kells Schmidt, editors, Proceedings, Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer.Google Scholar
  34. Sacks, H. 1972, An Analysis of the Course of A Joke’s Telling in Conversation. In Richard Baumann and Joel Scherzer, editors, Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, pp. 337–353. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  35. Sacks, H. 1992, Lectures on Conversation. Blackwell. Edited by Gail Jefferson.Google Scholar
  36. Saussure, F, 1976, Course in General Linguistics. Duckworth. Translated by Roy Harris.Google Scholar
  37. Star, S. 1989, Layered Space, Formal Representations and Long-Distance Control: The Politics of Information. Fundamenta Scientiae, 10:pp. 125–155.Google Scholar
  38. Star, S. 1989a The Structure of Ill-structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Problem-Solving. In Les Gasser and Michael Huhns, editors, Distributed Artificial Intelligence, volume 2, pp. 37–54. Pitman.Google Scholar
  39. Turner, M. 1997, The Literary Mind. Oxford.Google Scholar
  40. Varela, F, Thompson, E, and Rosch, E. 1991, The Embodied Mind. MIT.Google Scholar
  41. Vygotsky, L. 1962, Thought and Language. MIT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph A Goguen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science & EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations