Fossil Fuels Long Distance Pipeline Transport

  • Pavel Vlasak
  • Zdenek Chara
  • Vyacheslav Berman
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry book series (NAII, volume 149)


The paper deals with pipeline transport of fossil fuels. A general analysis of different ways of pipeline transport of coal, heavy viscous crude oil and natural gas or its products, capsule pipeline transport of coal and solidified crude oil in LNG is introduced. An advantage of common carrier transport system, based on LNG and liquid hydrocarbons used as carrier fluid, is discussed.

Key words

Pipeline transport fossil fuels common carrier LNG crude oil coal 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Vlasak P., Berman V. & Fadeichev V. (1994), Contribution to the capsule pipeline transport of highly viscous oil and oil products, J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 42, No.2–3, p. 131.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vlasak P., Berman V. & Chara Z. (2003), Pipeline transport of fossil fuels, In: Engineering Mechanics 2003, (J. Naprstek, C. Fischer eds.), ITAM AS CR, p. 374.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vlasak P., Buchtelova M. (1979), Contemporary trends of development of hydraulic transportation in the world. In: Hydraulic transport of materials through pipes. CSVTS, p. 154 (in Czech).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zandi J., Gimm K.K. (1976), Transport of solid commodities via freight pipeline, U.S., Dept. of Transportation, National Technical Information Service, Virginia 22161, USA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cowper N.T., Wasp E.J. (1973), Slurry pipelines — recent development, In: Transportation Symposium 1973, The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anderson V., Gudmundsson J.S. (1999), Transporting oil and gas as hydrate slurries, In: Hydrotransport 14, (J.F. Richardson ed.), BHR Group Conferences Series 36, p. 181.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ercolani D. (1986), Production plants and pipeline systems for Snamprogetti’s coal water slurries, recent experience and current projects in Italy and USSR. In: Hydrotransport 10, (A.P. Burns ed.), BHRA, p. 19Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hodgson G.W., Charles M.E. (1963), The pipeline flow of capsules, Part 1, The concept of capsule pipelining. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 41, No.2, p. 43.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jensen E.J. (ed.) (1974), TDA-RCA Capsule Pipeline Project. Alberta Research Information Series, No. 67.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jensen E.J. (ed.) (1975), TDA-RCA Capsule Pipeline Project. Alberta Research Information Series, No. 63.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alger G., Simons D. (1968), Fall velocity of irregular shaped particles. J. Hydr. Div., Proc. of ASCE, Vol. 94, NHY3, p. 721.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Snoek P., Gandhi R. & Weston M. (1979), Alternatives are studied for moving coal pipeline. J. Oil and Gas, No.8, p. 95.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grace W. (1980), Studies Colorado California Slurry Line. Coal Age, 85, No.4, p.45.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hydraulischer Rohrleitungstransport von Feststoffen (1980), Techn. Heute, 21, 10, p.412.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hydraulischer Rohrleitungstransport von Feststoffen (1980), Techn. Heute, 33, 11, p.16.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilta P. (1980), Slurry pipeline projects along to completion. J. Chemical Engineering, 87, No.12, p.75Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aude T., Chapman J. (1981), Coal/methanol slurry lines show promise. J Oil and Gas, 79, No.28, p.135Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goedde E. (1981), Potential for slurry pipelines for transportation of minerals in Europe. J. Pipeline, 53, No.7, p. 14.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lauzon M. A. (1982), A new black gold for pipelines? Can. Chem. Process, 66, No.1, p.29.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moiseev I. (1982), The methanol tree. J. Chemistry and Life, 18, p. 21. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nekhaev A. (1982), More in detail about methanol. J. Chemistry and Life, 18, p. 27. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu H. (1996), Coal Log Pipeline Design and Economics. In: Hydrotransport 13, (J.F. Richardson ed.), BHR Group Conference Series No. 20, p. 779.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu H. (2002), Coal log úpipeline technology — latest developments. In: Hydrotransport 15, (N. Heywood ed.), BHR Group, Vol. I, p.263.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vlasak P. (1995), The Toms effect in capsule-liquid flows, In: 8th Int. Freight Pipeline Society Symposium”, p. 93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavel Vlasak
    • 1
  • Zdenek Chara
    • 1
  • Vyacheslav Berman
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Hydrodynamics Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicCzech
  2. 2.Institute of Hydromechanics National Academy of Sciences of UkraineUkraine

Personalised recommendations