Advertisement

Expectation States Theory

  • Shelley J. Correll
  • Cecilia L. Ridgeway
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Conclusion

Expectation states theory is, in many ways, a textbook example of a theoretical research program. It is deductive, programmatic, formalized mathematically, cumulative, precise, and predictive; and its propositions have been subjected to rigorous evaluation. More importantly, however, it is a theory that illuminates core issues in social psychology and sociology more broadly. It is fundamentally a “macro-micro-macro” explanation about one way that categorical inequality is reproduced in society. Cultural beliefs about social categories at the macro level impact behavior and evaluation at the individual level, which acts to reproduce status structures that are consistent with pre-existing macro-level beliefs. Status structures in groups can be thought of as the building blocks of more macro-level structural inequalities in society. For example, to the extent that status processes make it less likely for women in work groups to emerge or be accepted as leaders, in the aggregate we will observe that more men than women hold leadership positions in organizations, a stratification pattern that is reproduced at least partially by the way macro-level beliefs impact individual behaviors and evaluations.

By focusing on the role of differentiated performance expectations, expectation states theory provides a unifying explanation for how reward structures, behavioral patterns, and macro-level beliefs about a diverse array of social categories produce similar effects on the organization of interactional status hierarchies, the building blocks of societal stratification. It helps us understand how inequitable structures emerge in these smaller structures, which increases our understanding of the emergence and reproduction of inequality in society more generally.

Keywords

Status Characteristic Status Belief American Sociological Review Performance Expectation Status Hierarchy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  4. Balkwell, J. W. (1991). From expectations to behavior: An improved postulate for expectation states theory. American Sociological Review, 56, 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger, J., Conner, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (Eds.). (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Wagner, D. G. (1985). The formation of reward expectations in status situations. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 215–261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R., & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  9. Berger, J., Norman, R. Z., Balkwell, J. W., & Smith, L. (1992). Status inconsistency in task situations: A test of four status processing principles. American Sociological Review, 57, 843–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1998). The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63, 379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berger, J., Wagner, D., & Zelditch, M. (1992). A working strategy for constructing theories. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Metatheorizing (pp. 107–123). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Berger, J., & Zelditch, M. (1998). Status, power, and legitimacy: Strategies and theories. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  13. Brewer, M., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 554–594). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender and race-based standards of competence: lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bylsma, W., & Major, B. (1992). Two routes to eliminating gender differences in personal entitlement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carter, S. L. (1993). Reflections of an affirmative action baby. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schribners.Google Scholar
  19. Cook, K. S. (1975). Expectations, evaluations, and equity. American Sociological Review, 40, 372–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Correll, S. J. (2001a). Gender and the career-choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Correll, S. J. (2001b). The gendered selection of activities and the reproduction of gender segregation in the labor force. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  22. Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1985). Patterns of visual dominance behavior in humans. In S. Ellyson & J. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–150). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Dovidio, J. E., Brown, C. E., Heltman, K. Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Driskell, J. E., & Mullen, B. (1990). Status, expectations, and behavior: A meta-analytic review and test of the theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 541–553.Google Scholar
  25. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice towards female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 537–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erickson, K. G. (1998). The impact of cultural status beliefs on individual task performance in evaluative settings: A new direction in expectation states research. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  27. Fisek, M. H., Berger, J., & Norman, R. Z. (1991). Participation in heterogeneous and homogeneous groups: A theoretical integration. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 114–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Nelson-Kilger, M. (1992). Status characteristics and expectation states theory: A priori model parameters and test. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 16, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Foschi, M. (1989). Status characteristics, standards and attributions. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 58–72). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Foschi, M. (1996). Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Foschi, M., Lai, L. & Sigerson, K. (1994). Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 326–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Freese, L., & Cohen, B. P. (1973). Eliminating status generalization. Sociometry, 36, 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  35. Harrod, W. J. (1980). Expectations from unequal rewards. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  37. Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.Google Scholar
  39. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.Google Scholar
  40. Lovaglia, M. J., Lucas, J. W., Houser, J. A., Thye, S. R., & Markovsky. B. (1998). Status processes and mental ability test scores. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Major, B., McFarlin, D., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1399–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Markovsky, B., Smith, L. F., & Berger, J. (1984). Do status interventions persist? American Sociological Review, 49, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years’ research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Moore, J. C. (1968). Status and influence in small group interactions. Sociometry, 31, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore, J. C. (1985). Role enactment and self identity: An expectations states approach. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior (pp. 262–316). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122.Google Scholar
  48. Norman, R. Z., Smith, L., & Berger, J. (1988). The processing of inconsistent status information. In M. Webster & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 169–187). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Pugh, M., & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ridgeway, C. L. (1987). Nonverbal behavior, dominance, and the basis of status in task groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 683–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ridgeway, C. L. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70, 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001a). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 627–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001b). Inequality, status, and the construction of status beliefs. In J. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory, (pp. 323–342). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ridgeway, C. L., & Balkwell, J. (1997). Group processes and the diffusion of status beliefs. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ridgeway, C. L., & Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in groups. American Sociological Review, 51, 603–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ridgeway, C. L., Berger, J., & Smith, L. (1985). Nonverbal cues and status: An expectation states approach. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 955–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ridgeway, C. L., Boyle, E. H., Kuipers, K., & Robinson, D. (1998). How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interaction. American Sociological Review, 63, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ridgeway, C. L., & Erickson, K. G. (2000). Creating and spreading status beliefs. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 579–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ridgeway, C. L., Johnson, C., & Diekema, D. (1994). External status, legitimacy, and compliance in male and female groups. Social Forces, 72, 1051–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1994). Structure, culture, and interaction: Comparing two generative theories. Advances in Group Processes, 11, 213–239.Google Scholar
  61. Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rudman, L., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash against agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Riecken, H. W. (1958). The effect of talkativeness on ability to influence group solutions of problems. Sociometry, 21, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sherif, M. B., White, J., & Harvey, O. J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 370–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Skvoretz, J., & Fararo, T. (1996). Status and participation in task groups: A dynamic network model. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1366–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith-Lovin, L., & Brody, C. (1989). Interruptions in group discussion: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review, 54, 424–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat is in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and intellectual task performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stewart, P. A., & Moore, J. C. (1992). Wage disparities and performance expectations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Strodtbeck, F. L., James R. M., & Hawkins, C. (1957). Social status in jury deliberations. American Sociological Review, 22, 713–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  72. Troyer, L., & Younts, C. W. (1997). Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first-order and second-order expectations in determining social influence. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 692–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Troyer, L. (2001). Effects of protocol differences on the study of status and social influence. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, 182–205. http: www.uiowa.edu/~grpprcGoogle Scholar
  74. Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1982). Paths of relevance and the induction of status-task expectancies. Social Forces, 61, 575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1997). Gender and interpersonal task behaviors: Status expectation accounts. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 1–32.Google Scholar
  76. Walker, H. A., & Zelditch, M. (1993). Power, legitimacy, and the stability of authority: A theoretical research program. In J. Berger & M. Zeltditich (Eds.), Theoretical research programs: Studies in the growth of theory (pp. 364–384). Stanford, CA: Stanford Press.Google Scholar
  77. Weber, M. ([1918] 1968). Economy and society. Edited by G. Roth & C. Wittich. Translated by E. Frischoff. New York: Bedminster.Google Scholar
  78. Weber, M. ([1921] 1946). Class, status, and party. In H. Gerth and C. W. Mills (Eds. and trans.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 180–195). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Webster, M. (1977). Equating characteristics and social interaction: Two experiments. Sociometry, 40, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Webster, M., & Driskell, J. E. (1978). Status generalization: A review and some new data. American Sociological Review, 43, 220–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Webster, M., & Foschi, M. (1988). Status generalization: New theory and research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  82. Webster, M., & Hysom, S. J. (1998). Creating status characteristics. American Sociological Review, 63, 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Webster, M., & Whitmeyer, J. M. (1999). A theory of second-order expectations and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  85. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  86. Zelditch, M., & Floyd, A. S. (1998). Consensus, dissensus, and justification. In J. Berger and M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, power, and legitimacy: Strategies and theories (pp. 339–368). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
  87. Zelditch, M., Lauderdale, P., & Stublarec, S. (1980). How are inconsistencies between status and ability resolved? Social Forces, 58, 1025–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shelley J. Correll
    • 1
  • Cecilia L. Ridgeway
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison
  2. 2.Department of SociologyStanford UniversityStanford

Personalised recommendations