Advertisement

The Feminization of Poverty

Past and Future
  • Sara S. McLanahan
  • Erin L. Kelly
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Keywords

Labor Force Participation Single Mother Poverty Rate Poverty Threshold Russell Sage Foundation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Advisory Council on Social Security. (1996). Report of the 1994–95 Advisory Council on Social Security, Vol. II. Washingon, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  2. Aponte, R. (1993). Hispanic families in poverty. Families in Society, 74, 527–537.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, F. D. (1997). Trends in the well-being of American women, 1970–1995. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 112–165.Google Scholar
  4. Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. (1989). Children’s experience in single-parent families: Implications of cohabitation and marital transitions. Family Planning Perspectives, 21, 256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casper, L. M., McLanahan, S. S., & Garfinkel, I. (1994). The gender-poverty gap: What we can learn from other countries. American Sociological Review, 59, 594–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castro Martin, T., & Bumpass, L. L. (1989). Recent trends in marital disruption. Demography, 26, 37–51.Google Scholar
  7. Citro, C., & Michael, R. (Eds.) (1995). Measuring poverty: A new approach. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, S. C. (1995). Advanced report of the final divorce statistics, 1989–1990. Monthly Vital Statistics, 43,8(Suppl.).Google Scholar
  9. England, P. (1997). Gender and access to money: What do trends in earnings and household poverty tell us? Paper presented at the Eighth International Meeting of the Comparative Project on Class Structure and Class Consciousness, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Farley, R. (1996). The new American reality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Folbre, N. (1987). The pauperization of mothers: Patriarchy and public policy in the US. In N. Gerstel & H. Gross, Families and work: toward reconceptualization (pp. 491–511). New York: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fuchs, V. (1986). The feminization of poverty? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper no. 1934.Google Scholar
  13. Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. S. (1986). Single mothers and their children. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Kamerman, S. B., & Kahn, A. J. (Eds.) (1991). Child care, parental leave, and the under three’s: Policy innovation in Europe. New York: Auburn House.Google Scholar
  15. McLanahan, S. S. (1995). Poverty. In D. Levinson, Encyclopedia of marriage and the family, Vol. 2 (pp. 549–556). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. McLanahan, S. S., & Casper, L. (1995). Growing diversity and inequality in the American family. In R. Farley (Ed.), State of the Union: America in the 1990s, Vol. 2 (pp. 1–46). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. McLanahan, S. S., Sorensen, A., & Watson, D. (1989). Sex differences in poverty, 1950–1980. Signs, 15, 102–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McLanahan, S. S., Casper, L., & Sorensen, A. (1995). Women’s roles and women’s poverty in eight industrialized countries. In K. O. Mason & A. M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 258–278). Oxford: IUSSP/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Moffitt, R. (1998). The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility: What do we know and what do we need to know. In R. Moffitt (Ed.), Welfare, the family, and reproductive behavior: Research perspectives. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  20. Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground: American social policy, 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Orshansky, M. (1965). Counting the poor: Another look at the poverty profile. Social Security Bulletin, 28, 3–29.Google Scholar
  22. Pearce, D. (1978). The feminization of poverty: Women, work and welfare. Urban and Social Change Review, 11, 28–36.Google Scholar
  23. Pearce, D. (1984). Farewell to alms: Women’s fare under welfare. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women, a feminist perspective (3rd ed., pp. 493–506). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  24. Portes, A. (1996). The economic sociology of immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. Portes, A., & Rumbault, R. G. (1997). Immigrant America: A portrait (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ruggles, P. (1994). Drawing the line. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Smeeding, T. M., Higgins, M. O., & Rainwater, L. (1990). Poverty, inequality, and income distribution in comparative perspective. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  28. Spain, D., & Bianchi, S. M. (1996). Balancing act: Motherhood, marriage, and employment among American women. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  29. Sweet, J., & Bumpass, L. L. (1987). Families and households in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  30. Tienda, M. (1995). Latinos and the American pie: Can Latinos achieve economic parity. Hispanic Journal of tBehavioral Sciences, 17, 403–429.Google Scholar
  31. Treas, J. (1995). Older Americans in the 1990s and beyond. Population Bulletin, May.Google Scholar
  32. Wetzel, J. R. (1995). Labor force, unemployment, and earnings. In R. Farley (Ed.), State of the union: American in the 1990s, Vol. 1 (pp. 56–106). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara S. McLanahan
    • 1
  • Erin L. Kelly
    • 2
  1. 1.Office of Population ResearchPrinceton UniversityPrinceton
  2. 2.Department of SociologyPrinceton UniversityPrinceton

Personalised recommendations