Application of Computer Technology to Drug Abuse Prevention

  • Kris Bosworth
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

Since the late 1970s, when computers were first introduced into classrooms, health educators and health-promotion scientists have attempted to harness this technology and its inherent appeal to youth for prevention purposes. Unfortunately, few of those efforts have been sustained to the point where efficacy can be shown through summative evaluation. While advances in the technology offer new frontiers for drug abuse prevention, few rigorous evaluations have been conducted. Those evaluations that have been conducted indicate, however, that there are some definite advantages and very few risks to using the technology. Because of its inherent appeal to youth, researchers and others developing drug prevention interventions should explore how their interventions might take advantage of the unique features that computer-based technologies offer. Researchers who have explored uses of technology need to be assertive in reporting the results of their studies. The prevention community needs to be attentive to the lessons that can be learned from less than perfect evaluation designs.

The past decade has seen tremendous advances in computer technology, allowing for more powerful prevention interventions. Prevention researchers have explored innovative uses of the technology and have identified several exciting opportunities to reach media-savvy generations. Over the next decade, the challenge to program developers and evaluators will be to integrate these promising technologies into existing programs and to identify, through rigorous evaluation, appropriate and effective applications.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alemi F., & Higley P. (1995). Reaction to “talking” computers assessing health risks. Medical Care, 33, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alemi, F., Stephens, R. C., Javalghi, R. G., Dyches, H., Butts, J., & Ghadiri, A. (1996). A randomized trial of a telecommunications network for pregnant women who use cocaine. Medical Care, 34(10 Suppl S), OS 10–OS 20.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, O. R. (1997). A neurocognitive perspective on current learning theory and science instructional strategies. Science Education, 81, 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Astuto, T. A. (1995). Activators and impediments to learner centered schools. Theory into Practice, 34, 243–249.Google Scholar
  5. Aveyard, P., & Cheng, K. K. (1999). Cluster randomised controlled trial of expert system based on the trans-theoretical model for smoking prevention and cessation in schools. British Medical Journal, 7215, 948–954.Google Scholar
  6. Barber, J. G. (1993). Computer-assisted drug prevention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 7, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BARN Research Group (Bosworth, K., Gustafson, D. H., & Hawkins, R. P.). (1994). The BARN system: Use and impact of adolescent health promotion via computer. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binik Y. M., Meana, M., & Sand, N. (1994). Interaction with a sex-expert system changes attitudes and may modify sexual behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boberg, E., Gustafson, D. H., Hawkins, R. P., Chan, Y., Bricker, E., Pingree, S., Berhe, H., & Peressini, A. (1995). Development, acceptance, and use patterns of a computer-based education and social support system for people living with AIDS/HIV infection. Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bosworth, K. (1996). DIADS assessment. Drug Stats [Online]. Available: http://www.drugstats.org/diads/diads.html.Google Scholar
  11. Bosworth, K., Espelage, D., & DuBay, T. (1998). A computer-based violence prevention intervention for young adolescents: A pilot study. Adolescence, 33, 785–795.Google Scholar
  12. Bosworth, K., Espelage, D., DuBay, T., Dahlberg, L., & Daytner, G. (1996). Using multimedia to teach conflict resolution skills to young adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 11, 65–74.Google Scholar
  13. Bosworth, K., Espelage, D., DuBay, T., Daytner, G., & Karageorge, K. (2000). A preliminary evaluation of a multimedia violence prevention program for early adolescence. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24, 268–280.Google Scholar
  14. Bosworth, K., & Gustafson, D. H. (1991). CHESS: Providing decision support for reducing health risk behavior and improving access to health services. Interfaces, 21, 93–104.Google Scholar
  15. Bosworth K., & Yoast, R. (1991). DIADS: Computer-based system for development of school drug prevention programs. Journal of Drug Education, 21, 231–245.Google Scholar
  16. Bransford, J. (1994a). The learning technology center at Vanderbilt University. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 20, 44–48.Google Scholar
  17. Bransford, J. (1994b). Who ya gonna call? Thoughts about teaching and problem solving. In P. Hallinger, K. Lithwood, & J. Murphy (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Educational Leadership. New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Brennan, P., Moore, S., & Smyth, K. (1991). Computer link: Electronic support for the home caregiver. Advances in Nursing Science, 13, 14–27.Google Scholar
  19. Brennan, P., Moore, S., & Smyth, K. (1995). Use of home-care computer network by persons with AIDS. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 10, 258–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brennan, P., & Ripich, S. (1994). Use of a home-care computer network by persons with AIDS. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 10, 258–272.Google Scholar
  21. Bryson R. (1999). Effectiveness of refusal skills software. Journal of Drug Education, 29, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burling, T., Burling, A., & Latini, D. (2001). A controlled smoking cessation trial for substance-dependent inpatients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Burling, T., Seidner, A., & Gaither, D. (1994). A computer-directed program for smoking cessation treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 6, 427–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carr, A. (1997). User-design in the creation of human learning systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dede, C., & Fontana, L. (1995). Transforming health education via new media. In L. Harris (Ed.), Health and the new media: Technologies transforming personal and public health. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  26. DeJong, W. (1996). Looking at binge drinking at 4-year colleges: Software user’s guide. Education Development Center.Google Scholar
  27. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systemic design of instruction (4th ed.), New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  28. Erickson, J. (1997). Building a community of designers: Restructuring learning through student hypermedia design. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 13, 5–27.Google Scholar
  29. Fletcher-Flin, C. M., & Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI): Meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gagné R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  31. Grennon-Brooks, J., & Brooks, M. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  32. Gropper, M., Liraz, Z., Portowicz, D., & Schindler, M. (1995). Computer integrated drug prevention: A new approach to teach lower socioeconomic 5th and 6th grade Israeli children to say no to drugs. Social Work in Health Care, 22, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gruender, C. D. (1996). Constructivism and learning: A philosophical appraisal. Educational Technology, 36, 21–29.Google Scholar
  34. Gustafson, D. H., Bosworth, K., Chewning, B., & Hawkins, R. P. (1987). Computer-based health promotion: Combining technological advances with problem-solving techniques to effect successful health behavior changes. The Annual Review of Public Health, 387–415.Google Scholar
  35. Gustafson, D. H., Bosworth, K., Hawkins, R. P., Boberg, E., & Bricker, E. (1992). CHESS: A computer-based system for providing information, referrals, decision support and social support to people in medical and other health-related crises. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (pp. 161–165).Google Scholar
  36. Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., & Land, S. M. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hardin, P., & Reis, J. (1997). Interactive multimedia software design: Concepts, process, and evaluation. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hawkins, R., Gustafson, D., Chewning, B., & Bosworth, K. (1987). Reaching hard-to-reach populations: Interactive computer programs as public information campaigns for adolescents. Journal of Communication, 37, 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holder, H. (1996). Using computer models to predict prevention policy outcomes. Alcohol Health & Research World, 20, 252–260.Google Scholar
  40. Izenberg, N., & Lieberman, D. A. (1998). The web, communication trends, and children’s health. Clinical Pediatrics, 37, 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kinzie, M. B., Schorling, J. B., & Siegel, M. (1993). Prenatal alcohol education for low-income women with interactive multimedia. Patient Education and Counseling, 21, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kritsch, K. M., Bostow, D. E., & Dedrick, R. F. (1995). Level of interactivity of videodisc instruction on college students’ recall of AIDS information. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 85–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kulik, J., Kulik, C. C., & Bangert-Downs, W. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kumar, N. B., Bostow, D. E., Schapira, D. V., & Kritsch, K. M. (1993). Efficacy of interactive, automated programmed instruction in nutrition education for cancer prevention. Journal of Cancer Education, 8, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lester, L., Mundt, J., Perrine, M., & Searles, J. (1995). Validation of daily self-reported alcohol consumption using interactive voice response (IVR) technology. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56, 487–490.Google Scholar
  48. Lieberman, D. A. (1992). The computer’s potential role in health education. Health Communication, 4, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lieberman, D. A. (1997). Interactive video games for health promotion: Effects on knowledge, self-efficacy, social support and health. In R. L. Street, W. R. Gold, & T. Manning (Eds.), Health promotion and interactive technology: Theoretical applications and future directions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  50. Lieberman, D. A. (1998). The researcher’s role in the design of children’s media and technology. In A. Druin (Ed.), The design of children’s technology. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  51. Litman, R. E. (1995). Suicide prevention in a treatment setting. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 25, 134–142.Google Scholar
  52. McCombs, B. L., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Meier, S., & Sampson, J. (1989). Use of computer-assisted instruction in the prevention of alcohol abuse. Journal of Drug Education, 19, 245–256.Google Scholar
  54. Moncher, M. S., Parms, C. A., & Orlandi, M. A. (1989). Microcomputer-based approaches for preventing drug and alcohol abuse among adolescents from ethnic-racial minority backgrounds. Computers in Human Behavior, 5, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mundt, J. G., Perrine, M. W., Searles, J. S., & Walter, D. (1995). An application of interactive voice response (IVR) technology to longitudinal studies of daily behavior. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 351–357.Google Scholar
  56. Niemiec, R., Schmidt, M., Weinstein, J., & Walberg, H. (1996). Learner-control effects: A review of reviews and a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Niemiec, R., & Walberg, H. (1987). The effects of computer based instruction in elementary schools: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 20, 85–103.Google Scholar
  58. Noell, J., Ary, D., & Duncan, T. (1997). Development and evaluation of a sexual decision-making and social skills program: The choice is yours—preventing HIV/STDs. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Noell, J., Biglan, A., Hood, D., & Britz, B. (1994). An interactive videodisc-based smoking cessation program: Prototype development and pilot test. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Orlandi, M. A., Dozier, C. E., & Marta, M. A. (1990). Computer-assisted strategies for substance abuse prevention: Opportunities and barriers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Paperny, D. (1997). Computerized health assessment and education for adolescent HIV and STD prevention in health care settings and schools. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pomeroy, E., & Detweiler, M. (1995). Compact disc interactive (CD-i) multimedia project. The Journal of Biocommunication, 22, 7–13.Google Scholar
  63. Reis, J., Riley, W., Lokman, L., & Baer, J. (2000). Interactive multimedia preventive alcohol education: A technology for higher education. Journal of Drug Education, 30, 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reis, J., & Tymchyshyn, P. (1992). A longitudinal evaluation of computer-assisted instruction on contraception for college students. Adolescence, 27, 803–811.Google Scholar
  65. Rhodes, F., Fishbein, M., & Reis, J. (1997). Using behavioral theory in computer-based health promotion and appraisal. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rickerd, V. I., Graham, C. J., Fisher, R., Gottlieb, A., Trosclair, A., & Jay, M. S. (1993). A comparison of methods for alcohol and marijuana anticipatory guidance with adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 14, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35, 31–38.Google Scholar
  68. Schneider, S., & Tooley, J. (1986). Self-help computer conferencing. Computers and Biomedical Research, 19, 274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shulman, H. A., Sweeney, B., & Gerler, E. R. (1995). A computer-assisted approach to preventing alcohol abuse: Implications for the middle school. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 30, 63–77.Google Scholar
  70. Silverman, S. (2000). Health and safety sites. Technology & Learning, 21, 50.Google Scholar
  71. Stanton, B. F., Li, X., Galbraith, J., Feigelman, S., & Kaljee, L. (1996). Sexually transmitted diseases, human immunodeficieny virus, and pregnancy prevention. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 150, 17–24.Google Scholar
  72. Street, R. L., & Rimal, R. N. (1997). Health promotion and interactive technology: A conceptual foundation. In R. L. Street & W. R. Gold (Eds.), Health promotion and interactive technology: Theoretical applications and future directions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  73. Thomas, R., Cahill, J., & Santilli, L. (1997). Using an interactive computer game to increase skill and self-efficacy regarding safer sex negotiation: Field test results. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tingen, M. S., Gramling, L. F., Bennett, G., Gibson, E. M., & Renew, M. (1997). A pilot study of preadolescents using focus groups to evaluate appeal of a video game smoking prevention strategy. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 9, 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Velicer, W. F., Prochaska, J. O., Bellis, J. M., Diclementi, C. C., & Rossi, J. S. (1993). An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Addictive Behavior, 18, 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Velicer, W. F., Prochaska, J. O., Fava, J. L., & Laforge, R. G. (1999). Interactive versus non-interactive and dose-response relationships for staged-matched smoking cessation programs in managed care. Health Psychology, 18, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Walther, J. (1992). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381–398.Google Scholar
  78. Wolcott, L. (1996). Distant, but not distanced: A learner-centered approach to distance education. Tech Trends, 41, 23–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kris Bosworth
    • 1
  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of ArizonaTucson

Personalised recommendations