Review of the Technology and Reliability Issues Arising as Optical Interconnects Migrate onto the Circuit Board

  • P. Misselbrook
  • D. Gwyer
  • C. Bailey
  • P. P. Conway
  • K. Williams


Light has the greatest information carrying potential of all the perceivable interconnect mediums; consequently, optical fiber interconnects rapidly replaced copper in telecommunications networks, providing bandwidth capacity far in excess of its predecessors. As a result the modern telecommunications infrastructure has evolved into a global mesh of optical networks with VCSEL’s (Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers) dominating the short-link markets, predominately due to their low-cost. This cost benefit of VCSELs has allowed optical interconnects to again replace bandwidth limited copper as bottlenecks appear on VSR (Very Short Reach) interconnects between co-located equipment inside the CO (Central-Office).

Spurred by the successful deployment in the VSR domain and in response to both intra-board backplane applications and inter-board requirements to extend the bandwidth between IC’s (Integrated Circuits), current research is migrating optical links toward board level USR (Ultra Short Reach) interconnects. Whilst reconfigurable Free Space Optical Interconnect (FSOI) are an option, they are complicated by precise line-of-sight alignment conditions hence benefits exist in developing guided wave technologies, which have been classified into three generations. First and second generation technologies are based upon optical fibers and are both capable of providing a suitable platform for intra-board applications. However, to allow component assembly, an integral requirement for inter-board applications, 3rd generation Opto-Electrical Circuit Boards (OECB’s) containing embedded waveguides are desirable.

Currently, the greatest challenge preventing the deployment of OECB’s is achieving the out-of-plane coupling to SMT devices. With the most suitable low-cost platform being to integrate the optics into the OECB manufacturing process, several research avenues are being explored although none to date have demonstrated sufficient coupling performance. Once in place, the OECB assemblies will generate new reliability issues such as assembly configurations, manufacturing tolerances, and hermetic requirements that will also require development before total off-chip photonic interconnection can truly be achieved.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    BPA, Optical backplanes—A global market and technology review 2000–2005, BPA Consulting: Dorking, Surrey, UK, Report No. 762, 2001. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Van-Daele, Optics in PCB’s: a Dream Coming True in Short Distance Optical Interconnects—From Backplane to Intra-chip Communication, CHACH, Chalmers University, Sweden, March 7th 2003. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.K. Mynbaev and L.L. Scheiner, Fibre-Optic Communications Technology, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 2001. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G.P. Ryan, Ed., Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing, ATG’s Communications & Networking Technology Guide Series, The Applied Technologies Group: One Apple Hill, Suite 216, Natick, MA, USA, 1997. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.A.B. Miller, Rationale and challenges for optical interconnects to electronic chips, Proc. IEEE, 88(6), pp. 728–749 (2000). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.A.B. Miller, Optical interconnects to silicon, IEEE Journal: Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 6(6), pp. 1312–1317 (2000). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cisco Systems Inc., Cisco Very Short Reach OC-192/STM-64 Interface: Optimizing for Network Intra-POP Interconnects, White Paper, 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA, USA, Cisco Systems, Inc., 2001. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Fuller, VSR optics acheives working concept and rough consensus, Lightwave, (February) (2001). Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.K. Dhodhi, S. Tariq, and K.A. Saleh, Bottlenecks in next generation DWDM-based optical networks, Computer Communications, 24, pp. 1726–1733 (2001). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Photonami, The Surface Emitting DFB M3 Laser, Photonami, 50 Mural Street, Richmond Hill, Onatario, Canada, June, 2003. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P.M. Henderson, Introduction to Optical Networks, January 29th, 2001, Mindspeed Technologies, Inc., Newport Beach, CA, USA, p. 36. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Welch, VCSELs: driving the cost out of high speed fibre optic data links, Compound Semiconductor Magazine, (July) (2000). Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Mederer, et al.High performance selectively oxidized VCSELs and arrays for parrallel high-speed optical interconnects, IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, 24(4), p. 442–449 (2001). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Peach, ULM refines VCSEL manufacturing technique, Lightwave Europe, June 2003. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y.-C. Ju, Vertical-Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers (VCSEL), ETRI, KyungPook National University: Department of Physics Education, Teachers College, 2004. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ulm Photonics, Product Datasheet: 850 nm multimode 2.5/3.125/5 Gbs N × M VCSEL array for direct FlipChip. Accessed (14th Dec. 2004),
  18. 18.
    E. Mohammed, et al.Optical interconnect system integration for ultra-short-reach applications, Intel Technology Journal: Optical Technologies and Applications, 8(2), pp. 115–128 (2004). Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Theodoras, L. Paraschis, and A.C. Houle, Emerging Optical Technologies for Multi-Service Metro Networks, Advanced Technology Group, Optical Networking, Cisco Systems, 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, CA, USA. Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Optical Internetworking Forum, Accessed (8th Dec. 2004).
  21. 21.
    M.L. Hammond, Moore’s law: the first 70 years, Semiconductor International, (April) (2004). Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. Young, Intel introduces chip-to-chip optical I/O prototype, Technology @ Intel Magazine, (April), p. 7 (2004). Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    N. Savage, Linking with light, IEEE Spectrum, (Aug.), pp. 32–36 (2002). Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    B. Layet and J.F. Snowdon, Comparison of two approaches for implementing free-space optical interconnection networks, Optics Communications, 189, pp. 39–46 (2001). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Chateaunenf, et al.512-channel vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser based free-space optical link, Applied Optics, 41, pp. 5552–5561 (2002). Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    S. Mukherjee, The quest for an affordable replacement for inter-processor switched free-space interconnect, Short Distance Optical Interconnects—From Backplanes to Intrachip Communication, CHACH, Chalmers University, Sweden, March 7th 2003. Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G.C. Boisset, B. Robertson, and H.S. Hinton, Design and construction of an active alignment demonstrator for a free-space optical interconnect, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 7(6), pp. 676–678 (1995). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    K. Hirabayashi, et al.Optical beam direction compensating system for board-to-board free space optical interconnection in high-capacity ATM switch, Lightwave Technology, 14(5), pp. 874–882 (1997). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D.P. Resler, et al.High-efficiency liquid-crystal optical phase-array beam steering, Optics Letters, 21(9), pp. 689–691 (1996). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    T.-Y. Yang, J. Gourlay, and A.C. Walker, Adaptive alignment packaging for 2-D arrays of free-space optical interconnected optoelectronic systems, IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, 25(1), pp. 54–64 (2002). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    T.D. Wilkinson and W.A. Crossland. Reconfigurable optical interconnects, MicroTech 2004, Moller Centre, Cambridge, IMAPS, UK, March 3rd–4th 2004. Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dickens, Optical backplanes—A global market and technology review 2000–2005, BPA Consulting, Dorking, Surrey, UK, 2001. Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    NTT-AT Website, (accessed 12th December 2004).
  34. 34.
    S. Agelis et al., Modular interconnection system for optical PCB and backplane communication, Proc. International Parrallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, April 19th 2002. Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Terahertz Photonics, Truemode Backplane: Product Information, Rosebank Park, Livingston, Scotland, UK, 2003. Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    OXL Website, (accessed 14th December 2004).
  37. 37.
    J.J. Morikuni, P.V. Mena, A.V. Harton, and K.W. Wyatt, The mixed-technology modeling and simulation of opto-electronic microsystems, Journal of Modeling and Simulation of Microsystems, 1(1), pp. 9–18 (1999). Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    PHYSICA, Multi-physics software Limited, University of Greenwich, London.
  39. 39.
    J. Piprek, Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices—Introduction to Physics and Simulation, Academic Press, California, 2003. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Misselbrook
    • 1
  • D. Gwyer
    • 2
  • C. Bailey
    • 2
  • P. P. Conway
    • 3
  • K. Williams
    • 3
  1. 1.Celestica, Kidsgrove, Stoke-on-TrentUK
  2. 2.Centre for Numerical Modelling and Process AnalysisUniversity of GreenwichLondonUK
  3. 3.Interconnection GroupLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations