Brain Repair pp 177-190 | Cite as

The Collagenous Wound Healing Scar in the Injured Central Nervous System Inhibits Axonal Regeneration

  • Susanne Hermanns
  • Nicole Klapka
  • Marcia Gasis
  • Hans Werner Müller
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 557)

Abstract

Following traumatic injuries of the central nervous system (CNS) a wound healing scar, resembling the molecular structure of a basement membrane and mainly composed of Collagen type IV and associated glycoproteins and proteoglycans, is formed. It is well known that CNS fibers poorly regenerate after traumatic injuries. In this article we summarize data showing that prevention of collagen scar formation enables severed axons in brain and spinal cord to regrow across the lesion site and to elongate in uninjured CNS tissue. We observed that regenerating fibers grow back to their former target where they develop chemical synapses, become remyelinated by resident oligodendrocytes and conduct action potentials.

Keywords

Connective Tissue Growth Factor Lesion Site Injured Spinal Cord Basement Membrane Lesion Core 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stichel, CC and Müller, HW. Experimental strategies to promote axonal regeneration. Prog Neurobiol 1998; 56: 119–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schnell L, Schwab ME. Axonal regeneration in the rat spinal cord produced by an antibody against myelin-associated neurite growth inhibitors. Nature 1990; 343: 269–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cai D, Shen Y, De BM et al. Prior exposure to neurotrophins blocks inhibition of axonal regeneration by MAG and myelin via a cAMP-dependent mechanism. 1999; Neuron 22: 89–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Snow DM, Lemmon V, Carrino DA et al. Sulfated proteoglycans in astroglial barriers inhibit neurite outgrowth in vitro. Exp Neurol 1990; 109: 111–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bovolenta P, Fernaud-Espinosa I, Mendez-Otero R et al. Neurite outgrowth inhibitor of gliotic brain tissue. Mode of action and cellular localization, studied with specific monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Neurosci 1997; 9: 977–989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moon LD, Brecknell JE, Franklin RJ et al. Robust regeneration of CNS axons through a track depleted of CNS glia. Exp Neurol 2000; 161: 49–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pasterkamp RJ, De WF, Giger RJ et al. Role for semaphorin III and its receptor neuropilin-1 in neuronal regeneration and scar formation? Prog Brain Res 1998; 117: 151–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bundesen LQ, Janis LS, Bregman BS et al. Alterations of EphB2 proteins following spinal cord injury in the adult rat. 2000; Abstract Book of the 30st annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fidler PS, Schuette K, Asher RA et al. Comparing astrocytic cell lines that are inhibitory or permissive for axon growth: the major axon-inhibitory proteoglycan is NG2. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 8778–8788.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bovolenta P, Fernaud-Espinosa I. Nervous system proteoglycans as modulators of neurite outgrowth. Prog Neurobiol 2000; 61: 113–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Probstmeier R, Stichel CC, Müller, HW Chondroitin sulfates expressed on oligodendrocyte-derived tenascin-R are involved in neural cell recognition—functional implications during CNS development and regeneration. J Neurosci Res 2000; 60: 21–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Becker T, Anliker B, Becker CG et al. Tenascin-R inhibits regrowth of optic fibers in vitro and persists in the optic nerve of mice after injury. GLIA 2000; 29: 330–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asher RA, Morgenstern DA, Moon LD et al. Chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans: inhibitory components of the glial scar. Prog Brain Res 2001; 132: 611–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bradbury EJ, Moon LD, Popat RJ et al. Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 2001; 416: 636–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stichel CC, Niermann H, D’Urso D et al. Basal membrane-depleted scar in lesioned CNS: characteristics and relationships with regenerating axons. Neuroscience 1999; 93: 321–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ramon y Cajal S, Degeneration and regeneration of the nervous system. 1928. New York, Hafner.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matinian LA, Andreasian AS (1973) Enzyme therapy in organic lesions of the spinal cord. Akademia Nauk Armenian SSR, 94pp (English translation: Los Angeles, Brain Information Service, University of California, 1976, 156pp).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feringa ER, Kowalski TF, Vahlsing HL et al. Enzyme treatment of spinal cord transected rats. Ann Neurol 1979; 5: 203–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matthews MA, St Onge MF, Faciane CL et al. Spinal cord transection: a quantitative analysis of elements of the connective tissue matrix formed within the site of lesion following administration of piromen, cytoxan or trypsin. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1979; 5: 161–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guth L, Albuquerque EX, Deshpande SS et al. Ineffectiveness of enzyme therapy on regeneration in the transected spinal cord of the rat. J Neurosurg 1980; 52: 73–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kagan HM. Intra-and extracellular enzymes of collagen biosynthesis as biological and chemical targets in the control of fibrosis. Acta Trop 2000; 77: 147–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hermanns S, Müller HW. Preservation and detection of lesion-induced collagenous scar in the CNS depend on the method of tissue processing. Brain Res Protoc 2001; 7: 162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hermanns S, Klapka N, Müller HW. The collagenous lesion scar—an obstacle for axonal regeneration in brain and spinal cord injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2001a; 19: 139–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carbonell AL, Boya J. Ultrastructural study on meningeal regeneration and meningo-glial relationships after cerebral stab wound in the adult rat. Brain Res 1988; 439: 337–344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Halfter W, Liverani D, Vigny M et al. Deposition of extracellular matrix along the pathways of migrating fibroblasts. Cell Tissue Res 1990; 262: 467–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eckes B, Zigrino P, Kessler D et al. Fibroblast-matrix interactions in wound healing and fibrosis. Matrix Biol 2000; 19: 325–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hermanns S, Reiprich P, Müller HW. A reliable method to reduce collagen scar formation in the lesioned rat spinal cord. J Neurosci Methods 2001b; 110: 141–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liesi P, Kauppila T. Induction of type IV collagen and other basement-membrane-associated proteins after spinal cord injury of the adult rat may participate in formation of the glial scar. Exp Neurol 2002; 173: 31–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shearer MC, Fawcett JW. The astrocyte/meningeal cell interface—a barrier to successful nerve regeneration? Cell Tissue Res 2001; 305: 267–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Duncan MR, Frazier KS, Abramson S et al. Connective tissue growth factor mediates transforming growth factor beta-induced collagen synthesis: down-regulation by cAMP. FASEB J 1999; 13: 1774–1786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Madri JA, Reidy MA, Kocher O et al. Endothelial cell behavior after denudation injury is modulated by transforming growth factor-betal and fibronectin. Lab Invest 1989; 60: 755–765.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grotendorst GR. Connective tissue growth factor: a mediator of TGF-beta action on fibroblasts. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 1997; 8: 171–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bradham DM, Igarashi A, Potter RL et al. Connective tissue growth factor: a cysteine-rich mitogen secreted by human vascular endothelial cells is related to the SRC-induced immediate early gene product CEF-10. J Cell Biol 1992; 114: 1285–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Frazier K, Williams S, Kothapalli D et al. Stimulation of fibroblast cell growth, matrix production, and granulation tissue formation by connective tissue growth factor. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 107: 404–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kothapalli D, Hayashi N, Grotendorst GR. Inhibition of TGF-beta-stimulated CTGF gene expression and anchorage-independent growth by cAMP identifies a CTGF-dependent restriction point in the cell cycle. FASEB J 1998; 12: 1151–1161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ramon-Cueto A, Cordero MI, Santos-Benito FF et al. Functional recovery of paraplegic rats and motor axon regeneration in their spinal cords by olfactory ensheathing glia. Neuron 2000; 25: 425–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurekah.com and Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne Hermanns
    • 1
  • Nicole Klapka
    • 2
  • Marcia Gasis
    • 2
  • Hans Werner Müller
    • 2
  1. 1.NEURAXO BIOTEC GmbHDüsseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory Department of NeurologyHeinrich-Heine-UniversityDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations