Using ebXML for Supply Chain Traceability

Pitfalls, solutions and experiences
  • A. Bechini
  • M. G. C. A. Cimino
  • A. Tomasi
Part of the IFIP International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 189)

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the main issues of traceability along the supply chain: architectural solutions, business process interaction, lot identification, traceability information management, and communication standards. In particular, the employment in this setting of two different standards for inter-enterprise business collaboration (as ebXML and Web Services) is discussed. Moreover, different standards for lot identification and data capture, as EPC for RFID and EAN/UCC for bar code are taken into account, uncovering their potential contributions in reducing the cost of procedures for tracking goods. The Cerere project experience is finally reported: it is shown that the architecture of a Web Information System framework (developed to assess food supply requirements) witnesses the actual possibility to support process integration and semantic interoperability via XML-based technologies.

Key words

Traceability Information Systems Web Services ebXML 

7. References

  1. 1.
    Regulation (EC) n. 178/2002, European Parliament and Council of 28 Jan 2002, ch. I,V.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Bechini, M.G.C.A. Cimino, B. Lazzerini, F. Marcelloni, A. Tomasi, “A general framework for food traceability”, IEEE SAINT 2005 Workshops, Proceedings pagg. 366–369, January–February 2005, Trento, Italy.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Binstock, D. Peterson, M. Smith, M. Wooding, C. Dix, C. Galtenberg, “The XML Schema Complete Reference”, Addison Wesley Professional, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    extensible Markup Language (XML), MLhttp://www.w3.org/XML/.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ebXML official website — http://www.ebxml.org.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Gibbs, S. Damodaran, “ebXML Concepts and Application”, John Wiley & Sons, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Kotok, D.R.R. Webber, “ebXML: The New Global Standard for Doing Business on the Internet”, New Riders Publishing, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    UN/CEFACT — United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business, http://www.unece.org/cefact/.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. de Castro Neto, M.B. Lima Rodrigues, P. Aguiar Pinto, I. Berger, “Traceability on the web — a prototype for the Portuguese beef sector”, EFITA 2003 Conference, 5–9 July 2003, Debrecen, Hungary, pp. 607–611.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.A. van Dorp, “Tracking and Tracing Business Cases: Incidents, Accidents and Opportunities”, EFITA 03 Conference, 5–9 July 2003, Debrecen, Hungary, pp. 601–606.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.R. Pape, B. Jorgenson, R.D. Boyle, J. Pauwels, “Let’s get animal traceback right the first time”, Food Traceability Report, Feb 2004, pagg. 14–15.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W.R. Pape, B. Jorgenson, R.D. Boyle, J. Pauwels, “Selecting the most appropriate database architecture”, Food Traceability Report, Feb 2003, pagg. 21–23.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. de Mello, P. de Azevedo, “Effects of Traceability on the Brazilian Beef Agribusiness System”, Virtual Library Osvaldo “Bebe” Silva, Quilmes, Argentina 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    EAN/UCC official website — http://www.ean-ucc.org/.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    EAN International, “EAN/UCC Traceability Implementation”, february 2003.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    EAN Belgium-Luxembourg, “EAN·UCC standards for shared supply chain traceability”, http://www.eanbelgilux.be/PAGE/brochuretracability.pdf.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan, “Guidelines for Introduction of Food Traceability Systems”, March 2003, http://www.maff.go.jp/trace/guide_en.pdf.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    EPCglobal official website — http://www.epcglobalinc.org/.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Finkenzeller, “RFID Handbook”, Carl Hanser Verlag Munich, 1998.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. M. Hornby, “RFID solutions for the express parcel and airline baggage industry”, Proc. IEE Colloq. RFID Technology, London, U.K. Oct 1999Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    U. Karthaus and M. Fischer, “Fully Integrated Passive UHF RFID Transponder IC With 16.7-μW Minimum RF Input Power”, IEEE Journal of solid state Circuits, Vol. 38, No 10, 2003, pp. 1602–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A.L. Annala, I. Oy, U. Friedrich, “PALOMAR Passive, Long range Multiple Access high frequency RFID system”, IST-1999-10339.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matrics Inc., “Matrics UHF RFID Tag Family”, 2004, pp. 5.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Philips Semiconductors, “I CODE1 label ICs Protocol Air Interface”, May 2002, pp. 42.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Philips Semiconductors, “UCODE HSL”, Oct. 2003, pp. 9.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    UN/EDIFACT-United Nations Directories for Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce, Transport, http://www.unece.org/trade/untdid/welcome.htm.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    OASIS-Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, http://www.oasis-open.org.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dieter E. Jenz, “ebXML and Web Services-Friends or Foes?”, 27.06.2002, http://www.mywebservices.org/index.php/article/articleview/451/1/1/.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    SOAP, http://www.w3.org/TR/soap/.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    W3C — World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Bechini
    • 1
  • M. G. C. A. Cimino
    • 1
  • A. Tomasi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione: Elettronica, Informatica, TelecomunicazioniUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations