Advertisement

A Model of Information Systems Development for Learning Virtual Organizations

  • Mart Roost
  • Rein Kuusik
  • Karin Rava
  • Tarmo Veskioja
Conference paper

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alter, S., 2002, Work System Method for Understanding Information Systems and Information Systems Research, Communications of the Assotiation for Information Systems 9(6).Google Scholar
  2. Apshankar, K., Sadhwani, D., Samtani, G., Siddiqui, B., Clark, M., Fletcher, P., Hanson, J. J., Irani, R. M., Waterhouse, M., and Zhang, L. J., 2002, Web Services Business Strategies and Architectures, Expert Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, R., 1991, Oracle CASE Method: Tasks and Deliverables.Google Scholar
  4. Bultje, R., van Wijk, J., 1998, Taxonomy of Virtual Organisations, based on definitions, characteristics and typology, in: VoNet: The Newsletter 2(3):9–12; (March 1, 2001), http://www.virtual-organization.net.Google Scholar
  5. Checkland, P., and Scholes, J., 1990, Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, London.Google Scholar
  6. da Cunha, P. R., and de Figueiredo, A. D., 2001, Information Systems Development as Flowing Wholeness, in: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8/WG8.2 Working Conference on Realining Research and Practice in Information Systems Development, Boise, USA, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, G. B., 2000, Information systems conceptual foundations: looking backward and forward, in: Organizational and social perspectives on information technology: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG8.2 International Working Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 61–82.Google Scholar
  8. Frankel, D. S., 2003, Model Driven Architecture: Applying MDA to Enterprise Computing, Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., and Rumbaugh, J., 1999, The Unified Software Development Process.Google Scholar
  10. Kirikova, M., 1998, Completeness and Levels of Business Models, Proceedings of the Third International Baltic Workshop of Databases and Information Systems, Riga, Latvija, pp. 39–51.Google Scholar
  11. Larman, C., 2001, Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and the Unified Process, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  12. Lyytinen, K., Rose, G., and Welke, R., 1998, The Brave New World of development in the internetwork computing architecture (InterNCA): or how distributed computing platforms will change systems development, Information Systems Journal 8(4):241–253.Google Scholar
  13. Marshall, C., 1999, Enterprise Modelling with UML — Designing Successful Software through Business Analysis.Google Scholar
  14. Mikli, T., 1997, Introduction to Information Systems, Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar
  15. Mikli, T., and Rava, K., 1998, System Work in System Development, in: Organisation Structures, Management, Simulation of Business Sectors and Systems: Proceedings of the IFORS Special Conference (SPC8), Kaunas, Lithuania, pp. 213–217.Google Scholar
  16. Powazek D. M., 2002, Design for Community: The Art of Connecting Real People in Virtual Places, New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Preece, J., 2000, Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  18. Reithofer, W., and Naeger, G., 1997, Bottom-up planning approaches in enterprise modelling — the need and state of the art, Computers in Industry (33):223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roost, M., 1996, Information Systems Development on the basis of the Role-Model, in: Databases and Information Systems: Proceedings of the Second International Baltic Workshop, Tallinn, pp. 37–47.Google Scholar
  20. Roost M., Kuusik, R., and Elmik, L., 1998, A Subject-Centred Framework for Information System and Organisation Development: Analysis and (Re)Design, in: Organisation Structures, Management, Simulation of Business Sectors and Systems: Proceedings of the IFORS Special Conference (SPC8), Kaunas, Lithuania, pp. 222–228.Google Scholar
  21. Roost M., Kuusik, R., Elmik, L., Veskioja, T., and Rava, K., 1999, The Role-Model: An OO Framework for Information Systems Self-Development, Poster Abstracts of Conf. UML’99, Fort Collins, USA, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
  22. Roost, M., Kuusik, R., Veskioja, T., 2001, A Role-Based Framework for Information System Self-Development, in: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8/WG8.2 Working Conference on Realining Research and Practice in Information Systems Development, Boise, USA, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
  23. Roost, M., 2004, A Model of Self-Development of Information Systems, in: The Proceedings of the 8th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI 2004), Volume I, Information Systems, Technologies and Applications, Orlando, USA, July 18–21, pp. 126–131.Google Scholar
  24. Russo, N. L., 2000, Expanding the horizons of information systems development, in: Organizational and social perspectives on information technology: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG8.2 International Working Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 103–112.Google Scholar
  25. Scheer, A. W., 2000, ARIS — Business Process Frameworks, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Strausak, N., 1998, Resumee of VoTalk, Organizational Virtualness, P. Sieber and J. Griese, Proceedings of the VoNet-Workshop, April 27–28. Simowa Verlag Bern, 1998; (11.05.2001), http://virtual-organization.net/news/proc-98.pdf.Google Scholar
  27. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W. M., 2002, A Guide to Manage Knowledge: Cultivating Communities of Practice, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mart Roost
    • 1
  • Rein Kuusik
    • 1
  • Karin Rava
    • 1
  • Tarmo Veskioja
    • 1
  1. 1.Tallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations