The Mutual Relevance of Indigenous Psychology and Morality

  • Lutz H. Eckensberger
Part of the International and Cultural Psychology book series (ICUP)


Moral Judgment Moral Development Filial Piety Rule System Moral Thinking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119–128.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, J. W. (2000). Cross-cultural psychology: A symbiosis of cultural and comparative approaches. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, J. W. & Kim, U. (1993). The way ahead: From indigenous psychologies to a universal psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 277–280). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Boesch, E. E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  6. Brett, J. M. (2000). Culture and negotiation. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brislin, R. W. & Cushner, K. & Cherrie, C. & Yong, M. (1986). Intercultural interactions: A practical guide. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Clemens, Iris. (2004). Bildung — Semantik — Kultur: Subjektive Theorien über education im indischen Kontext. Dissertation, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  9. Colby, A. & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. Vol. 2: Standard issue scoring manual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1994). Origin and development of psychology in Latin America. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 717–727.Google Scholar
  11. Dilthey, W. (1894/1957). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie. Sitzungsberichte der Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften (1894). In Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. V., S.139–240. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  12. Eckensberger, L. H. (1979). Ametamethodological evaluation of psychological theories from a cross-cultural perspective. In L. H. Eckensberger, W. J. Lonner & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology (pp. 255–275). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  13. Eckensberger, L. H. (1986). Handlung, Konflikt und Reflexion: Zur Dialektik von Struktur und Inhalt im moralischen Urteil. In W. Edelstein & G. Nunner-Winkler (Eds.), Zur Bestimmung der Moral. Philosophische und sozialwissenschaftliche Beiträge zur Moralforschung (S. 409–442). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Eckensberger, L. H. (1990). On the necessity of the culture concept in psychology: A view from cross-cultural psychology. In F. J. R. van de Vijver & G. J. M. Hutschemaekers (Eds.), The investigation of culture. Current issues in cultural psychology (pp. 153–183). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eckensberger, L. H. (1993). Zur Beziehung zwischen den Kategorien des Glaubens und der Religion in der Psychologie In T.V. Gramkrelidze (Ed.), Brücken. Beiträge zum Dialog der Wissenschaften aus den Partneruniversitäten Praha, Saarbrücken, Sofia, Tbilissi und Warszawa (pp. 49–104). Tbilissi, Universitätsdruck.Google Scholar
  16. Eckensberger. L.H. (1994). On the social psychology of cross-cultural research. In A.-M Bouvey, F.J.R. van de Vijver, P. Boski & P. Schmitz (Eds.), Journeys into cross-cultural psychology (pp. 31–40). Lisse: Zwets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  17. Eckensberger, L. H. (1995). Activity or action: Two different roads towards an integration of culture into psychology? Psychology & Culture, 1, 67–80.Google Scholar
  18. Eckensberger, L. H. (1996). Agency, action and culture: Three basic concepts for psychology in general and cross-cultural psychology in specific. In J. Pandey, D. Sinha & P. S. Bhawak (Eds.), Asian contribution to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 72–102). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Eckensberger, L. H. (2002). Paradigms revisited: From incommensurability to respected complementarity. In H. Keller, Y. Poortinga & A. Schölmerich (Eds.), Biology, culture, and development: Integrating diverse perspectives (pp. 341–383). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Eckensberger, L. H., Döring, T. & Breit. H. (2001). Moral dimensions in risk evaluation. Research in social problems and public policy. In G. Boehm, J. Nerb, T. L. McDaniels, & H. Spada (Eds.), Special issue on environmental risks: Perception, evaluation and management (pp. 137–163.) (Vol. 9). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  21. Eckensberger, L. H., Kapadia, Sh., & Wagels, K. (2000). Social Cognitive Domains of Thinking in Marriage Partner Selection: The Indian Context. Paper of the 16th ISSBD Biennal Meeting in Beijing.Google Scholar
  22. Eckensberger, L. H., & Reinshagen, H. (1980). Kohlbergs Stufentheorie der Entwicklung des Moralischen Urteils: Ein Versuch ihrer Reinterpretation im Bezugsrahmen handlungs-theoretischer Konzepte. In L. H. Eckensberger, & R. K. Silbereisen (Eds.), Entwicklung sozialer Kognitionen: Modelle, Theorien, Methoden, Anwendung (S. 65–131). Stuttgart. Germany: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  23. Eckensberger, L. H., & Zimba, R. F. (1997). The development of moral judgment. In P. Dasen, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed.): Vol. 2. Developmental Psychology (pp. 299–338). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  24. Edwards, C. P. (1986). Cross-cultural research on Kohlberg’s stages: The basis for consensus. In Modgil S. & Modgil C. (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and controversy, (pp. 419–430). London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  25. Enriquez, A. (1982). Towards a Filipino psychology. Quezon City: Psychology Research and Training House.Google Scholar
  26. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T. & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), The private and the public self (pp. 189–212). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture: Where do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gutmann, D. (1967). On cross-cultural studies as a naturalistic approach in psychology. Human Development, 10, 187–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2. Bde. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  31. Hassan, Fuad (2002). Cultural diversity and the prospect of peace-building through sharing a weworld. Key note speech. XVI Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology. Unity in Diversity: Enhancing a peaceful world. July 15–19, 2002 Yogyakarta, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  32. Ho, D., Y. F., Peng, S., Lai, A. Ch. & Chan, S. F. (2001). Indigenization and beyond: Methodological relationalism in the study of personality across cultural traditions. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 925–953.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huebner, A. & Garrod, A. (1991). Moral reasoning in a karmic world. Human Development, 34, 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hwang, K.-K. (1998). Two moralities: Reinterpreting the findings of empirical research on moral reasoning in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 211–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kant, I. (1968/1788). Kritik der Praktischen Vernunft. In W. Weischedel (Hrsg.), Werkausgabe in 12 Bänden, Bd. VII. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  36. Keller, H. (1997). Entwicklungspsychopathologie. In H. Keller (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Kleinkindforschung, 2. Auflage (S. 625–641). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  37. Keller. H. & Eckensberger, L. H. (1998). Kultur und Entwicklung. In H. Keller (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch. Entwicklungspsychologie (S. 57–96). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  38. Kim, U. (1990). Indigenous psychology: Science and applications. In R. Brislin (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (pp. 142–160). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Kim, U. (2000). Indigenous, cultural, and cross-cultural psychology: A theoretical, conceptual, and epistemological analysis. A Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of moral thinking and choice in the years ten to sixteen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  41. Kohlberg, L. (1973). Continuities in childhood and adult moral development revisited. In P. Baltes & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Personality and socialization. (pp. 180–204). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. E. Licona, (Hrsg.), Moral development and behavior. Theory research and social issues (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  43. Kohlberg, L. (1986). Acurrent statement on some theoretical issues. In Modgil S. & Modgil C. (Eds.) Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and controversity. (pp. 485–546). London, Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kohlberg, L., Boyd, D., & LeVine, C. (1986). Die Wiederkehr der sechsten Stufe: Gerechtigkeit, Wohlwollen und der Standpunkt der Moral. In W. Edelstein & G. Nunner-Winkler (Eds.), Zur Bestimmung der Moral: Philosophische und sozialwissenschaftliche Beiträge zur Moralforschung (pp. 205–240). Frankfurt/M., Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  45. Kornadt, H-J. (2002). Biology, culture and child rearing: The development of social motives. In H. Keller, Y. Poortinga & A. Schölmerich (Eds.), Biology, culture, and development: Integrating diverse perspectives (pp. 191–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Krishnan, L. (1997). Distributed justice in the Indian perspective. In H.S.K Kao & D. Sinha (eds.), Asian perspectives on psychology, vol 19, Cross-cultural research and methodology issues (pp. 185–200). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Lei, T. & Cheng, S. W. (1984). An empirical study of Kohlberg’s theory and scoring system of moral judgment in Chinese society. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  49. Ma, H. K. (1988). Objective moral judgment in Hong Kong, Mainland China and England. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19(1), 78–95.Google Scholar
  50. Ma, H. K. (1998). The Chinese stage structure of moral development. A cross-cultural perspective. Manuscript. Department of Education Studies. Hong Kong, Baptist University.Google Scholar
  51. Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller, J. G. (1994). Cultural diversity in the morality of caring: Individually-oriented versus duty-based interpersonal moral codes. Cross-Cultural Research, 28(1), 3–39.Google Scholar
  53. Misra, G. (2001). Culture and self: Implications for psychological inquiry. Journal of Indian Psychology, 19(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  54. Miyake, K., Chen, S. & Campos, J. J. (1985). Infant temperament, mothers mode of interaction, and attachment in Japan. An interim report. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1–2, Serial No. 209).Google Scholar
  55. Morin, E. (1973). Das Rätsel des Humanen [The riddle of the humane]. Munich/Zurich: Piper.Google Scholar
  56. Murray Thomas, R. (1988). Oriental theories of human development. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
  57. Nsamenang, A. B. (1992). Human development in cultural context. A Third World perspective. Vol. 16. Newsbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Quine, W. v. O. (1976). Word & Object. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rogoff, B. & Angelillo, C. (2002). Investigating the Coordinated Functioning of Multifaceted Cultural Practices in Human Development. Human Development, 45, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Säävälä, M. (2001). Low caste but middle-class: Some religious strategies for middle-class identification in Hyderabad. Contributions to Indian Society, 35(3), 295–318.Google Scholar
  61. Saraswathi, T.S. & Ganapathy, H. (2002). The Hindu world view of child and human development: Reflections in contemporary parental ethnotheories. In H. Keller, Y. Poortinga & A. Schölmerich (Eds.), Biology, culture, and development: Integrating diverse perspectives (pp. 80–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Schwartz, L. (1951). Die Neurosen und die dynamische Psychologie von Pierre Janet [Neuroses and the dynamic psychology of Pierre Janet]. Basel, Switzerland: Schwabe.Google Scholar
  63. Setiono, K. (1994). Morality from the viewpoint of Javanese tradition. Paper presented at the Symposium “Eco-ethical thinking from a cross-cultural perspective”, July 1994, Kirkel, Germany.Google Scholar
  64. Shweder, R. A. (2000). The psychology of practice and the practice of the three psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shweder, R. A. & Haidt, J. (1991). The future of moral psychology: Truth, intuition and the pluralist way. Manuscript prepared for Psychological Science.Google Scholar
  66. Shweder, R. A., Mahapatra, M. & Miller, J. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. In J. Kagan, & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 1–83). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Sinha, D. (1996). Cross-cultural psychology: The Asian scenario. In J. Pandey, D. Sinha & D. P. S. Bhawuk (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 20–41). New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  68. Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed.), vol. 1 (pp. 129–169). Boston, MA.: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  69. Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collective culture: Acase of coexistence of opposites. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications, (pp.123–126). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Smedslund, J. (1984). The invisible obvious: Culture in psychology. In K. M. J. Lagerspetz & P. Niemi (Eds.), Psychology in the 1990’s. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  71. Snarey, J. (1983). The social and moral development of Kibbutz founders and abras: A crosssectional and longitudinal cross-cultural study (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(10), 3416b.Google Scholar
  72. Snarey, J. (1985). Cross-cultural universality of socio-moral development: Acritical review of Kohlbergian research. Psychological Bulletin, 97(2), 202–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Snarey, J. & Keljo, K. (1991). In a Gemeinschaft voice: The cross-cultural expansion of moral development theory. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behaviour and development, Vol. I: Theory, (pp. 395–424). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  74. Stern, W. (19112) Die Differentielle Psychologie in ihren methodischen Grundlagen. Ed. K. Pawlik. Bern: Hans Huber. (Nachdruck 1994).Google Scholar
  75. Sugiyama Lebra, T. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  76. Tietjen, A. & Walker, L. (1984). Moral reasoning and leadership among men in a Papua New Guinea village. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  77. Van de Vijver, F. & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  78. Van de Vijver, F. & Poortinga, Y. H. (2002). On the Study of Culture in Developmental Science. Human Development, 45, 246–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Van Vlaenderen, H. (1993). Psychological research in the process of social change: A contribution to community development. Psychology and Developing Societies, 5, 95–110.Google Scholar
  80. Vasudev, J. (1984). Kohlberg’s claim to universality. An Indian perspective. Paper for the Second Rinberg Conference, Rinberg West Germany.Google Scholar
  81. Vine, I. (1986). Moral maturity in socio-cultural perspective: Are Kohlberg’s stages universal? In Modgil, S. & Modgil C. (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and controversy (pp. 431–450). London, Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  82. Yang, K. S. (2000). Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zimba, R. F. (1994). The understanding of morality, convention, and personal preference in an African setting. Findings from Zambia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(3), 369–393.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lutz H. Eckensberger
    • 1
  1. 1.University of the Saarland (Saarbrücken)Germany

Personalised recommendations