Advertisement

Semilandmarks in Three Dimensions

  • Philipp Gunz
  • Philipp Mitteroecker
  • Fred L. Bookstein
Part of the Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects book series (DIPR)

Keywords

Corpus Callosum Sexual Dimorphism Tangent Plane Geometric Morphometrics Deformation Grid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andresen, P. R., Bookstein, F. L., Conradsen, K., Ersboll, B. K., Marsh, J. L., and Kreiborg, S., 2000, Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19:1053–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ax, P., 1984, Das phylogenetische System. Systematisierung der lebenden Natur aufgrund ihrer Phylogenese. G. Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  3. Bernhard, M., 2003, Sexual dimorphism in the craniofacial morphology of extant hominoids. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  4. Bookstein, F. L., 1991, Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK), New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bookstein, F. L., 1997, Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med. Image. Anal. 1:225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bookstein, F. L. and Green, W. D. K., 2002, Users Manual, EWSH3.19, ftp://brainmap.med.umich.edu/pub/ewsh.3.19.manual.Google Scholar
  7. Bookstein, F. L., Sampson, P. D., Connor, P. D., and Streissguth, A. P., 2002, Midline corpus callosum is a neuroanatomical focus of fetal alkohol damage, Anat. Rec. 269:162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bookstein, F. L., Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., Prossinger, H., Schaefer, K., and Seidler, H., 2003, Cranial integration in Homo: Morphometrics of the mid-sagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution, J. Hum. Evol. 44:167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bookstein, F. L., Sampson, P. D., Streissguth, A. P., and Connor, P. D., 2001, Geometric morphometrics of corpus callosum and subcortical structures in the fetal-alcohol-affected brain, Teratology 64:4–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bookstein, F. L., Schaefer, K., Prossinger, H., Seidler, H., Fieder, M., Stringer, C., et al. 1999, Comparing frontal cranial profiles in archaic and modern homo by morphometric analysis, Anat. Rec. 257:217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cain, A., 1982, On Homolgy and Convergence, in: Problems of Phylogenetic Studies, K. Joysey and A. Friday, eds., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  12. Cutting, C., Bookstein, F. L., Haddad, B., Dean, D., and Kim, D., 1998, A spline-based approach for averaging three-dimensional curves and surfaces, in: Mathematical Methods in Medical Imaging II, J. Wilson and D. Wilson, eds., SPIE Proceedings.Google Scholar
  13. Cutting, C., Dean, D., Bookstein, F. L., Haddad, B., Khorramabadi, D., Zonneveld, F. W., and McCarthy, J. G., 1995, A three-dimensional smooth surface analysis of untreated Crouzon’s syndrome in the adult, J. Craniofac. Surg. 6:444–453.Google Scholar
  14. Dryden, I. L. and Mardia, K. V., 1998, Statistical Shape Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., Teschler-Nicola, M., and Seidler, H., 2002, Using Semi-landmarks on surfaces to analyze a Neolithic hydrocephalus, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 33:79.Google Scholar
  16. Mitteroecker, P., Gunz, P., Teschler-Nicola, M., and Weber, G. W., 2004, New morphometric methods in Paleopathology: Shape analysis of a Neolithic Hydrocephalus, Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology.Google Scholar
  17. Good, P., 2000, Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Jardine, N., 1969, The observational and theoretical components of homology: A study based on the morphology of the dermal skull-roofs of rhipistidian fishes, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1:327–349.Google Scholar
  19. Marcus, L. F., Frost, S. R., Bookstein, F. L., Reddy, D. P., and Delson, E., 1999, Comparison of landmarks among living and fossil Papio and Theropithecus skulls, with extension of Procrustes methods to ridge curves. Web publication, http://research.amnh.org/nycep/aapa99/aapa6.html.Google Scholar
  20. Mayr, E., 1963, Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Mayr, E., 1975, Grundlagen der zoologischen Systematik: P. Parey.Google Scholar
  22. Moyers, R. E. and Bookstein, F. L., 1979, The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics, Am. J. Orthod. 75:599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ponce de Leon, M. S. and Zollikofer, C. P., 2001, Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity, Nature 412(6,846):534–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Remane, A., 1952, Die Grundlage des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest und Portig, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  25. Rohlf, F. J., 1993, Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings, in: Contributions to Morphometrics, L. F. Marcus, E. Bello, and A. GarcÍa-Valdecasas, eds., Monografias, Museo Nacional de Ciencies Naturales, Madrid.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philipp Gunz
    • 1
  • Philipp Mitteroecker
    • 1
  • Fred L. Bookstein
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for AnthropologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Michigan Center for Biological InformationUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations