Costs of Conservation: National and International Roles
Abstract
With growing awareness of the irreversible loss of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (PGRFA), there has been an immense effort in terms of human and financial resources devoted to the collection and conservation of plant genetic resources and the establishment of an institutional framework at international, national and local levels. Deficits of information and uncertainties are, however, hindering an economically efficient approach to optimizing agrobiodiversity conservation. Despite the existing uncertainties, the political will of countries stresses the importance of genetic resources conservation, even though long-term conservation activities face strong competition from other, often more short-term development activities for the allocation of financial resources. Considering these circumstances, there is a need for cost-effective and efficient strategies for PGRFA conservation. Cost-efficient conservation will reduce the risk of losing unique, genetically coded information and reduce the problem of allocating an excessive amount of financial resources to conservation activities. Therefore, this chapter analyzes the national and international actors’ costs of PGRFA conservation activities and discusses existing and potential collaborations between the actors with the aim of increasing the efficiency of PGRFA conservation. Furthermore, this chapter highlights the opportunities and limitations of funding of conservation activities, especially applied to regional and international collaborations.
Key words
actors of PGRFA conservation cost-effective and efficient-PGRFA conservation funding of conservation activities funding mechanisms international and regional collaboration national and international conservation costs plant genetic resources for food and agriculturePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Chandel, K. P. S., 1996, Personal Communication, NBPGR, Director, New Delhi.Google Scholar
- Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (CGRFA), 2002, The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO (January 23, 2002); http://www.fao.org/ag/cgrfa/itpgr.htm.Google Scholar
- FAO, 1996, Global Plan of Action for the Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
- FAO, 1998, The State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
- Hammer, K., 1995, Personal communication, Institute of Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Gatersleben, Head of Genebank.Google Scholar
- Iwanaga, M., 1993, Enhancing links between germplasm conservation and use in a changing world, International Crop Science, I:407–413.Google Scholar
- Smith, S., and Salhuana, W., 1996, The role of industry in the conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources, Presentation at the Industry Workshop: The Conservation and Utilisation of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Basel (February 15–16, 1996).Google Scholar
- UNEP (United Nations Environment Program), 1994, Convention on Biological Diversity, Text and Annexes, Interim Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity, Geneva Executive Center, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Virchow, D., 1996, National and international expenditures for conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in 1995, A draft background paper for the document ITCPGR/96/INF/1: Current Expenditures for the Conservation and Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Prepared for the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources, Leipzig, FAO, Rome (June, 17–23, 1996).Google Scholar
- Virchow, D., 1999a, Conservation of Genetic Resources: Costs and Implications for a Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Virchow, D., 1999b, Financing of The Global Plan Of Action, Background report for FAO, 1999, Financing of the Global Plan of Action, CGRFA-9/99/4, Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Eighth Session, Rome, FAO (April 19–23, 1999).Google Scholar
- von Braun, J., and Virchow, D., 1997, Conflict-prone formation of markets for genetic resources: Institutional and economic implications for developing countries, Quart. J. for Inter. Agri., 1:6–38.Google Scholar
- Wood, D., and Lenne, J., 1993, Dynamic management of domesticated biodiversity by farming communities, in: Proceedings of the UNEP/Norway Expert Conference on Biodiversity, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar