Part of the Food Science Texts Series book series (FSTS)


Sanitizers are applied to reduce the pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms of food facilities and equipment. Soils must be completely removed for sanitizers to function properly.

The major types of sanitizers are thermal, radiation, and chemical. Thermal and radiation techniques are less practical for food production facilities than is chemical sanitizing. Of the chemical sanitizers, the chlorine compounds tend to be the most effective and the least expensive, although they tend to be more irritating and corrosive than are the iodine compounds or the quaternary ammonium compounds. Bromine compounds are more beneficial for wastewater treatment than for sanitizing cleaned surfaces, although bromine and chlorine are synergistic when combined. The quats are more restrictive in their activities but are effective against mold growth and have residual properties. They do not kill bacterial spores but can limit their growth. Acid-quat and chlorine dioxide sanitizers offer potential for the control of L. monocytogenes, and ozone is being evaluated as a chlorine substitute. Glutaraldehyde can be incorporated as a sanitizer for conveyor lubricants used for food operations. Various tests are available to determine the concentration of sanitizing solutions.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anon. 1996. Sanitizers for meat plants. Wyandotte, MI: Diversey Corp.Google Scholar
  2. Anon. 1997. Guide to sanitizers. Prepared Foods March: 81.Google Scholar
  3. Anon. 2003. Making the right choice-Sanitizers. St. Paul, MN: Ecolab Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Barboza, Y., D. Martinez, K. Ferrer, and E.M. Salas. 2002. Combined effects of lactic acid and nisin solution in reducing levels of microbiological contamination in red meat carcasses. J Food Prot 65: 1780.Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan, R.L., and M.P. Doyle. 1997. Foodborne disease significance of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other enterohemorrhagic E. coli. Food Technol 51, no. 10: 69.Google Scholar
  6. Carsberg, H. 1996. Selecting your sanitizers. Food Quality 2, no. 11: 35.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, J.P. 2003. New developments in sanitation helped keep the plants clean. Food Technol 57 no. 10: 81.Google Scholar
  8. Dorsa, W.J., C.N. Cutter, and G.R. Siragusa. 1996. Effectiveness of a steam-vacuum sanitizer for reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7 inoculated to beef carcass surface tissue. Lett Appl Microbiol 23: 61.Google Scholar
  9. Dorsa, W.J. 1997. New and established carcass decontamination procedures commonly used in the beef processing industry. J Food Prot 60: 1146.Google Scholar
  10. Eifert, J.D., and G.C. Sanglay. 2002. Chemistry of chlorine sanitizers and food processing. DairyFood Environ Sanit July: 534.Google Scholar
  11. Felix, C.W. 1991. Sanitizers fail to kill bacteria in biofilms. Food Prot Rep 5: 6.Google Scholar
  12. Flickinger, B. 1997. Automated cleaning equipment. Food Qual III 23: 30.Google Scholar
  13. Frank, J.F., and R.A.N. Chmielewski. 1997. Effectiveness of sanitation with quaternary ammonium compound vs. chlorine on stainless steel and other food preparation surfaces. J Food Prot 60: 43.Google Scholar
  14. Fratamico, P.M., F.J. Schultz, R.C. Benedict, R.L. Buchanan, and P.H. Cooke. 1996. Factors influencing attachment of Eschericia coli O157:H7 to beef tissues and removal using selected sanitizing rinses. J Food Prot 59: 453.Google Scholar
  15. Giambrone, C.J. 2004. The babble on biocides. Food Qual 11, no. 4: 75.Google Scholar
  16. Hodson, D. 2003. Biostatic synthetic lubricants ease contamination concerns. The National Provisioner 217, no. 10: 112.Google Scholar
  17. Hodson, D. 2004. Food-grade lubricants can make your product safer. Food Qual 11, no. 2): 90.Google Scholar
  18. Kozempel, M., N. Goldberg, and J.C. Craig, Jr. 2003. The vacuum/steam/vacuum process. Food Technol 57, no. 12: 30.Google Scholar
  19. Le Chevallier, M.W., C.D. Cawthon, and R.G. Lee. 1988. Factors promoting survival of bacteria in chlorinated water supplies. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 649.Google Scholar
  20. Lentsch, S. 1979. Sanitizers for an effective cleaning program. In Sanitation notebook for the seafood industry, ed. G.J. Flick, et al., 77. Blacksburg: Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.Google Scholar
  21. Maddock, R. 2003. Pasteurization technology is more than just hot air. Meat Market Technol November, 61.Google Scholar
  22. Maddox, R. 2004. Controlling pathogens with H2O. Meat Market Technol May, 81.Google Scholar
  23. Marshall, R.T. 2003. Acids, pathogens, foods and us. Food Prot Trends 23: 882.Google Scholar
  24. McCarthy, S.A. 1996. Effect of sanitizers on Listeria monocytogenes attached to latex gloves. J Food Safety 16: 231.Google Scholar
  25. McDonnell, G., G. Grignol, and K. Antloga. 2002. Vapor phase hydrogen peroxide decontamination of food contact surfaces. Dairy Food Environ Sanit 22: 868.Google Scholar
  26. Meinhold, N.M. 1991. Chlorine dioxide foam effective against Listeria-less contact time needed. Food Proc 52, no. 2: 86.Google Scholar
  27. Naidu, A.S. 2002. Activated lactoferrin-A new approach to meat safety. Food Technol 56, no. 3: 40.Google Scholar
  28. Odlaug, T.E. 1981. Antimicrobial activity of halogens. J Food Prot 44: 608.Google Scholar
  29. Park, D.L., S.M. Rua, Jr., and R.F. Acker. 1991. Direct application of a new chlorite sanitizer for reducing bacterial contamination on foods. J Food Prot 54: 960.Google Scholar
  30. Stahl, N.Z. 2004. 99.99 percent sure. Meat Proc 43, no. 7: 36.Google Scholar
  31. Stier, R. 2002. The story of O3. Meat Poultry September, 36.Google Scholar
  32. Zammer, C. 2004. Food irradiation: Is it a matter of taste? Food Qual 11, no. 3: 44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Personalised recommendations