Sustainability, Consumer Sovereignty, and the Concept of the Market

  • Gerhard Scherhorn

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beu, D. (2001). Accountability as it influences ethical behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(11-A), June, 4451. US: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
  2. Binder, S. (1996). Die Idee der Konsumentensouveränität in der Wettbewerbstheorie. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  3. Braungart, M. & McDonough, W. (2002). Cradle to cradle. Remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dobson, A. (2000). Drei Konzepte ökologischer Nachhaltigkeit. Natur und Kultur, 1,(1) 62–85.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Dyllick, T. & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grossman, R.I. & Adams, F.T. (1993). Taking care of business: Citizenship and the charter of incorporation. S. Yarmouth, MA: Charker Ink.Google Scholar
  7. Hildebrand, G.H. (1951). Consumer sovereignty in modern times. American Economic Review, 41, Papers and Proceedings, p. 26.Google Scholar
  8. Hutt, W.H. (1936). Economists and the public. A Study of competition and opinion. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  9. Jeschke, D. (1975). Konsumentensouveränität in der Marktwirtschaft — Idee, Kritik, Realität Duncker & HumboltGoogle Scholar
  10. Meyer-Abich, K.M. (1997). Praktische Naturphilosophie. München: Beck.Google Scholar
  11. Muris, T. J. (2002). The interface of competition and consumer protection. Prepared Remarks at the Fordham Corporate Law Institute's Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy, New York City, October 31, 2002.Google Scholar
  12. Neumayer, E. (1999). Weak versus strong sustainability. Cheltenham/UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  13. Newcorn, D. (2003). Cradle-to-cradle: The next packaging paradigm? Packaging World, May 2003.Google Scholar
  14. Pauli, G. (2000). Upsizing. The road to zero emissions. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Robinson, N.A. (Ed., 1993). Agenda 21. Earth-action plan. New York: Coeana Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Rothenberg, J. (1966). Wiedersehen mit der Konsumentensouveränität und Entdeckung der Vorteile der Wahlfreiheit. In: E. & M. Streissler (Eds.), Konsum und Nachfrage, pp. 470–485. Berlin: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.Google Scholar
  17. Scherhorn, G. (2004). Wertorientierung, Lebensstil und Lebenslage — Chancen und Grenzen individueller Nachhaltigkeit. <http://www.nachhaltigkeitsrat.de/service/download/temine/2004/Vortrag_Scherhorn BN RNE_16-10-04.pdf>Google Scholar
  18. Schröder, H. (2004). Der japanische Toprunneransatz im Klimaschutz. Ökologisches Wirtschaften, Heft 3–4, Juni 2004, 22–23.Google Scholar
  19. Segal, J.M. (1999). Graceful simplicity. Towards a philosophy and politics of simple living. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  20. St. James, E. (1998). Living the simple life. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  21. Udéhn, L. (1993). Twenty-five years with the logic of collective action. Acta Sociologica, 36(3), 239–261.Google Scholar
  22. Valer, A. (1999). Bilanci di giustizia. Bologna: Editrice Missionaria Italiana.Google Scholar
  23. Vickers, J. (2003). Economics for consumer policy. Keynes Lecture in Economics, The British Academy, 29. October 2003.Google Scholar
  24. v. Bömmel, H. (2003). Konsumentensouveränität. Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
  25. WZB — Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (2002). World summit on sustainable development. political declaration and Johannesburg Plan of implementation. Berlin: WZB-Paper FS II 02-405.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Scherhorn
    • 1
  1. 1.Wuppertal InstitutGermany

Personalised recommendations