Interpreting Morphological and Molecular Data on Indian Ocean Giant Tortoises

  • Justin Gerlach
Conference paper

Abstract

Since 1877 it has been assumed that human exploitation led to the extinction of all Indian Ocean giant tortoises except for the Aldabran Dipsochelys dussumieri. A taxonomic review in 1998 proposed that two further species survived in captivity. Some recent molecular studies question the validity of these taxa. All available evidence is re-examined in a discussion of the identity of the Seychelles giant tortoises.

Morphological data identifies three living morphotypes (D. dussumieri, D. arnoldi and D. hololissa), data on wild and captive growth distinguishes these from the results of abnormal growth. Molecular data is less clear cut with conflicts between different studies. RAPDs identify the morphotypes although microsatellites identify very little population structuring. Different mtDNA genes conflict, with ND4 sequences relating to the different morphotypes but cytochrome b failing to do so.

Key words

Cylindraspi Dipsochelys Mascarenes molecular taxonomy morphology Seychelles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austen, J. J. and Arnold, E. N., 2001, Ancient mitochondrial DNA and morphology elucidate an extinct island radiation of Indian Ocean giant tortoises (Cylindraspis), Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:2515–2523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austen, J. J., Arnold, E. N. and Bour, R., 2003, Was there a second adaptive radiation of giant tortoises in the Indian Ocean? Mol. Evol. 12:1396–1402.Google Scholar
  3. Beerli, P., 2002, MIGRATE. Version 1.5. [http://evolution.geneticswashington.edu/lamarc.html]Google Scholar
  4. Bowie, R. C. K., 2003, Birds, molecules, and evolutionary patterns among Africa’s islands in the sky, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  5. Gerlach, J., 1999, Distinctive neural bones in Dipsochelys giant tortoises, J. Morphol. 240:33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerlach, J., 2004a, Giant Tortoises of the Indian Ocean, Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  7. Gerlach, J., 2004b, Effects of diet on the systematic utility of the tortoise carapace, Afr. J. Herpetol. 53:77–85.Google Scholar
  8. Gerlach, J., and Bour, R., 2003, Morphology of hatchling Dipsochelys giant tortoises, Radiata 12:11–20.Google Scholar
  9. Gerlach, J., and Canning, L., 1998a, Taxonomy of Indian Ocean giant tortoises (Dipsochelys), Chel. Cons. & Biol. 3:3–19.Google Scholar
  10. Gerlach, J., and Canning, L., 1998b, Identification of Seychelles giant tortoises, Chel. Cons. & Biol. 3:133–135.Google Scholar
  11. Honda, M., Yasukawa, Y., Hirayama, R., and Ota, H., 2002, Phylogenetic relationships of the Asian box turtles of the genus Cuora sensu lato (Reptilia: Bataguridae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences, Zool. Sci. 19:1305–1312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuly, A. C. van der, Ballasina, D. L. P., Dekker, J. T., Maas, J., Willemsen, R. E. and Goudsmit, J., 2002, Phylogenetic relationships among the species of the genus Testudo (Testudinea: Teastudinidae) inferred from mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene sequences, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22:174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lamb, T., Lydeard, C., Walker, R. B., and Gibbons, J. W. 1994, Molecular systematics of map turtles (Graptemys), Syst. Biol. 43: 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Macey, J. R., Papenfuss, T. J., Kuehl, J. V., Fourcade, H. M., and Boore, J. L., 2004, Phylogenetic relationships among amphisbaenian reptiles based on complete mitochondrial genomic sequences, Mol. Phyl. Evol. 33:22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Neigel, J. E., 2002, Is FST obsolete? Conserv. Gene. 3:167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Omoto, K., Katoh, T., Chichvarkhin., A., and Yagi, T., 2004, Molecular systematics and evolution of the “Apollo” butterflies of the genus Parnassius (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequence data, Gene. 326:141–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paetkau, D., Calvert, W., Stirling, I., and Strobeck, C., 1995, Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears, Mol Ecol. 4:347–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Palkovacs, E. P., Maschner, M., Ciofi, C., Gerlach, J., and Caccone, A., 2003, Are the native giant tortoises from the Seychelles really extinct? Mol. Ecol. 12:1403–1414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Radtkey, R. R., 1996, Adaptive radiation of day-geckoes (Phelsuma) in the Seychelles Archipelago: a phylogenetic analysis, Evolution 50:604–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stuart, B. L., and Parnham, J. F., 2004, Molecular phylogeny of the critically endangered Indochinese box turtle (Cuora galbinifrons), Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:164–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Whitlock, M. C., and McCauley, D. E., 1999, Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: Fst≠1/(4Nm +1), Heredity 82:117–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson, P. J., Grewal, S. K., Lawford, I. D., Heal, J.N.M., Granacki, A. D., Pennock, D., Theberge, J. B., Theberge, M. T., Voigt, D. R., Waddell, W., Chambers, R. E., Paquet, P. C., Goulet, G., Cluff, D., and White, B. N., 2000, DNA profiles of the eastern Canadian wolf and the red wolf provide evidence for a common evolutionary history independent of the gray wolf, Can. J. Zool. 78:2156–2166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justin Gerlach
    • 1
  1. 1.University Museum of Zoology CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations