Application of Optimal Control Theory to Dynamic Soaring of Seabirds

  • G. Sachs
  • P. Bussotti
Part of the Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications book series (NOIA, volume 79)

Abstract

Optimal control theory is applied as a method for determining the minimum wind strength required for dynamic soaring of seabirds. Dynamic soaring is a flight technique by which seabirds extract energy from shear wind existing in an altitude layer close to the water surface. Mathematical models for describing the soaring motion of a bird and for the shear wind are presented. Optimality conditions are formulated using the minimum principle. Switching conditions are introduced to deal with a state constraint. Numerical results of high accuracy are generated using an efficient computational procedure based on the method of the multiple shooting for an albatross as a representative for seabirds performing dynamic soaring.

Keywords

Wind Speed Shear Wind Multiple Shooting Lift Coefficient Flight Path 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Idrac, P.: Exprimentelle Untersuchungen über den Segelflug. Berlin: Oldenburg-Verlag 1932.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Rayleigh, J. W. S.: The Soaring of Birds. Nature 27, pp. 534–535, 1883.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Idrac, M. P.: Étude théoretique des manoeuvres des albatros par vent croissant avec l’alitude. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 179, pp. 1136–1139, 1924.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Prandtl, L.: Beobachtungen über den dynamischen Segelflug. Zeitschrift für Flugtechnik und Motorluftschiffahrt, Vol. 21, pp. 116, 1930.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Tickell, W.L.N.: Albatrosses. Pica Press, Robertsbridge, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Cone, C.D., Jr.: A Mathematical Analysis of the Dynamic Soaring Flight of the Albatross with Ecological Interpretations. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virgina, Special Scientific Report 50, 1964.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Wood, C.J.: The Flight of Albatrosses (A Computer Simulation). IBIS 115, pp. 244–256, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Lighthill, J.: Aerodynamics Aspects of Animal Flight. Bull. Inst. Math. Applics., 10, pp. 369–393, 1974.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hendriks, F.: Dynamic Soaring in Shear Slow. AIAA Paper No. 74-1003, 1974.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Lighthill, I: Animal Flight. In: Mathematical Biofluiddynamics, SIAM, Philadelphia, Chapter 8, pp. 151–178, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Wilson, J.A.: Sweeping flight and soaring by albatrosses, Nature, Vol. 257, pp. 307–308, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Berger, M., Göhde, W.: Zur Theorie des Segelfluges von Vögeln über dem Meere. Zool. Jb. Physiol., Vol. 71, pp. 217–224, 1965.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Pennycuick, C.J.: The Flight of Petrels and Albatrosses (Procellaiiformes), Observed in South Georgia and its Vicinity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 300, pp. 75–106, 1982.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Pennycuick, C. J.: Gust soaring as a basis for the flight of petrels and albatrosses (Procellariiformes). Avian Science 2, pp. 1–12, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Sachs, G.: Minimalbedingungen für den dynamischen Segelflug. Zeitschrift für Flugwissenschaften und Weltraumforschung, Band 13 (1989), S. 188–198.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Sachs, G., Lesch, K.: Optimal Periodic Trajectorries of Aircraft with Singular Control. 11th IFAC World Congress Proceedings, 1990.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Sachs, G.: Minimaler Windbedarf für den dynamischen Segelflug der Albatrosse. Journal für Ornithologie 134, pp. 435–445, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Jouventin, Pp., Weimerskirch, H. 1990. Satellite Tracking of Wandering Albatrosses. Nature 343, pp. 746–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Prince, P. A., Wood, A. G., Barton, T., Croxall, J. P.: Satellite tracking of wandering albatrosses (Diomedea exulans) in the South Atlantic. Antarctic Science 4(1), pp. 31–36, 1992.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Alerstam, T., Gudmundsson, G.A., Larsson, B.: Flight tracks and speeds of Antarctic and Atlantic seabirds: radar and optical measurements. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 340, pp. 55–67, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Tuck, G.N., Polacheck, T., Croxall, J.P., Weimerskirch, H., Prince, P.A., Wotherspoon, S.: The Potential of Archival Tags to Provide Long-term Movement and Behaviour Data for Seabirds: First Results from Wandering Albatross Diomedea exulans of South Georgia and the Crozet Islands. EMU Vol. 99, pp. 60–68, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Weimerskirch, H., Wilson, R.P.: Oceanic respite for wandering albatrosses. Nature, Vol. 406. pp. 955–956, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Weimerskirch, H., Bonadonna, F., Billeul, F., Mabille, G., Dell’omo, G., Lipp, H-P.: GPS Tracking of Foraging Albatrosses. Science, Vol. 295, pp. 1259, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Thomas, F.: Grundlagen für den Entwurf von Segelflugzeugen. Motorbuch Verlag, Stuttgart, 1979.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Swolinsky, M.: Beiträge zur Modellierung von Scherwind für Gefährdungsuntersuchungen. Dissertation, Technische Universität Carolo-Wilhelminia zu Braunschweig, 1986.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Bock, H.G.: Numerische Behandlung von zustandsbeschränkten und Chebychef-Steuerungsproblemen. Course R 1.06 of the Carl-Cranz-Gesellschaft, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, 1983.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Bulirsch, R.: Die Mehrzielmethode zur numerischen Lösung von nichtlinearen Randwertproblemen und Aufgaben der optimalen Steuerung. Bericht der Carl-Cranz-Gesellschaft, Oberpfaffenhofen, 1971; Nachdruck: Report des Sonderforschungsbereiches 255, Lehrstuhl für Höhere Mathematik und Numerische Mathematik, TU München, 1993.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Oberle, H.J.: Numerische Berechnung optimaler Steuerungen von Heizung und Kühlung für ein realistisches Sonnenhausmodell. Institut für Mathematik der Technischen Universität München, TUM-M8310, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Sachs
    • 1
  • P. Bussotti
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Flight Mechanics and Flight ControlTechnical University of MunichGarchingGermany
  2. 2.Humboldt Foundation, Institute of Science HistoryLudwig-Maximilians University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations