Advertisement

Reflective Learning

Problems and Questions Concerning a Current Contextualization of the Vygotskian Approach
  • Bernd Fichtner

Abstract

Both the works of art and the theoretical concepts are forms of knowledge based upon the hypothetical nature of our knowledge about reality. For reflective learning, the importance of works of art and theoretical concepts lies in the fact that they are spaces for development of thinking; they are never objects, results or drilled routines, methods and techniques. They are spaces for development of thinking in a special way: the subject will be able to think himself or herself. Drawing on an empirical research project, we shall inquire into following question: In what way is the sphere of the hypothetical or, the thinkable or the possible a space in which the human being can unfold his existence as a free and active being, potentially infinitely capable of development?

Key words

Activity theory of learning self-referentiality work of art 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people. Neoliberalism and global order. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  2. Fichtner, B. (1996). Lernen und Lerntätigkeit. Phylogenetische, ontogenetische und epistemologische Studien. Marbug: BdWi-Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Guattari, F./ Rolnik, S. (1986). Micropolítica. Cartografias do desejo. Petropolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
  4. Humboldt, W. V. (1980). Werke in fünf Bänden. (Eds. A. Flitner/ K. Giel) Vol IV. Der Königsberger und der Litauische Schulplan. (1809). Darmstadt: J. G. Cotta’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  5. Jameson, Fr. (1991). Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism. New York: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Leont’ev. A. N. (1981). Problems of development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Marx, K. (1983). Theses on Feuerbach. In: E. Kamenka (Ed.) The portable Karl Marx. New York: Penguin Books, 155–158.Google Scholar
  8. Seeger, F. (1998). Representations in the mathematics classrooms. In F. Seeger/ J. Voigt/ U. Waschescio (Eds.), The Culture of the Mathematics Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and Speech. In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.) The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology, 38–285), New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  10. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997a). The history of development of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.) The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol.4. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  12. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology. A methodological investigation. In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.) The collected works of L S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Fichtner
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachbereich 2 ErziehungswissenschaftUniversität SiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations