Social Networks and Entrepreneurship

  • Toby E. Stuart
  • Olav Sorenson
Part of the International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship book series (IHSE, volume 2)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E. (1990). Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments and risk sharing. Management Science, 36, 1232–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, W. (1984). The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 775–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossard, J.S. (1932). Residential propinquity as a factor in marriage selection. American Journal of Sociology, 38, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brittain, J.W., & Freeman, J.H. (1986). Entrepreneurship in the semiconductor industry. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Burt, R.S., & Raider, H.J. (2002). Creating careers: Women's paths to entrepreneurship. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  8. Burton, M.D., Sørensen, J.B., & Beckman, C. (2002). Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 19, 229–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bygrave, W.B., & Timmons, J.A. (1992). Venture capital at the crossroads. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, J.S., Katz, E., & Mendel, H. (1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 20, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahl, M.S. (2003). Knowledge diffusion and regional clusters: Lessons from the Danish ICT industry. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  13. Elfring, T., & Hulsink, W. (2003). Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21, 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans, D.S., & Javonovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 808–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fleming, L., Juda, A., & King, C. (2004). Small worlds and regional innovative advantage. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, J.H. (1983). Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth, 1, 33–52.Google Scholar
  17. Fried, V.H., & Hisrich, R.D. (1994). Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial Management, 23, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedkin, N.E. (1998). A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gompers, P.A. (1995). Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. Journal of Finance, 50, 1461–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J.H. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hellman, T. (1998). The allocation of control rights in venture capital contracts. RAND Journal of Economics, 29, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsu, D.H. (2004). What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? Journal of Finance, 59, 1805–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaplan, J. (1996). Startup: A Silicon Valley adventure. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Kaplan, S., & Strömberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klepper, S. (2002). The evolution of the automobile industry and Detroit as its capital. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA.Google Scholar
  27. Klepper, S., & Sleeper, S. (2000) Entry by spinoffs. Unpublished manuscript, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA.Google Scholar
  28. Kono, C., Palmer, D., Friedland, R., & Zafonte, M. (1998). Lost in space: The geography of corporate interlocking directorates. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 863–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Latour, B. (1989). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, N. (1969). The search for an abortionist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Levinthal, D. (1991). Random walks and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 397–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liles, P.R. (1974). New business ventures and the entrepreneur. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  33. Mitton, D.G. (1990). Bring on the clones: A longitudinal study of the proliferation, development and growth of the biotech industry in the San Diego. In N.C. Churchill, W.D. Bygrave, J.A. Hornaday, D.F. Muzyka, K.H. Vesper, & W.E. Wetzel, Jr. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 1990 (pp. 344–358). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
  34. Rezulli, L.A., Aldrich, H., & Moody, J. (2000). Family matters: Gender, networks and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces, 79, 523–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rivkin, J.W. (2001). Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organization Science, 12, 274–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  37. Romanelli, E. (1989). Environments and strategies of organization start-ups: Effects on early survival. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 369–387.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryan, B., & Gross, N.C. (1946). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15–24.Google Scholar
  39. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Shane, S., & Stuart, T.E. (2002). Initial endowments and the performance of university startups. Management Science, 48, 364–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Søorensen, J.B., & Sorenson, O. (2003). From conception to birth: Opportunity perception and resource mobilization in entrepreneurship. Advances in Strategic Management, 20, 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sorenson, O., & Audia, P.G. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the U.S., 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 424–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J.W., & Fleming, L. (2004). Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  45. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T.E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1546–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J.G. March (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations (pp. 153–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  47. Stuart, T.E., & Ding, W. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs: An empirical analysis of university scientists participation in commercial ventures. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  48. Stuart, T.E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R.C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 315–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stuart, T.E., & Sorenson, O. (2003a). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32, 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stuart, T.E., & Sorenson, O. (2003b). Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Warner, M. (1998). Inside the Silicon Valley money machine. Fortune (October 26), 128–140.Google Scholar
  52. Watts, D.J. (1999). Small worlds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toby E. Stuart
    • 1
  • Olav Sorenson
    • 2
  1. 1.Columbia UniversityColumbia
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations