An Introduction to Catastrophe Models and Insurance

  • Patricia Grossi
  • Howard Kunreuther
  • Don Windeler
Part of the Catastrophe Modeling book series (HSRI, volume 25)

Keywords

Geographic Information System Catastrophe Risk Exceedance Probability Federal Emergency Management Agency Risk Management Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

2.8 References

  1. American Re (2002). Topics: Annual Review of North American Natural Catastrophes 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Algermissen, S.T. (1969). Seismic risk studies in the United States, 4th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Proceedings, Chilean Association for Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
  3. Brinkmann, W. (1975). Hurricane Hazard in the United States: A Research Assessment. Monograph #NSF-RA-E-75-007, Program on Technology, Environment and Man, Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  4. FEMA 249 (1994). Assessment of the State of the Art Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodologies, June.Google Scholar
  5. FEMA (2002). HAZUS99 SR2 User’s Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency.Google Scholar
  6. Insurance Information Institute (2000). Catastrophes [online]. The Insurance Information Institute 10 June 2000 <http://www.iii.org/media/issues/catastrophes>.Google Scholar
  7. Kozlowski, R. T. and Mathewson, S. B. (1995). “Measuring and Managing Catastrophe Risk,” 1995 Discussion Papers on Dynamic Financial Analysis, Casualty Actuarial Society, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
  8. Kunreuther, H., R. Hogarth, J. Meszaros and M. Spranca (1995). “Ambiguity and underwriter decision processes,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 26: 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kunreuther, H. and Roth, R. (1998). Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States. Washington, D.C: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  10. Neumann, C.J. (1972). An alternate to the HURRAN tropical cyclone forecast system. NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS SR-62, 24 pp.Google Scholar
  11. NIBS (1997). HAZUS: Hazards U.S.: Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology. NIBS Document Number 5200, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Panjer, H. H. and Willmot, G.E. (1992). Insurance Risk Models. Illinois: Society of Actuaries.Google Scholar
  13. Steinbrugge, K. V. (1982). Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and Tsunamis: An Anatomy of Hazards. Skandia America Group: New York, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Stone, J. (1973). “A theory of capacity and the insurance of catastrophe risks: Part I and Part II,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 40: 231–243 (Part I) and 40: 339-355 (Part II).Google Scholar
  15. Stover, C.W. and Coffman, J.L (1993). Seismicity of the United States, 1568-1989. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. USWRC (1967). A Uniform Technique for Determining Flood Flow Frequencies, U.S. Water Resource Council, Hydrology Committee, Bulletin 15, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Grossi
  • Howard Kunreuther
  • Don Windeler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations