Factors Affecting Nanoindentation Test Data

Part of the Mechanical Engineering Series book series (MES)


Residual Stress Plastic Zone Indentation Test Depth Reading Specimen Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N.M. Jennett and J. Meneve, “Depth sensing indentation of thin hard films: a study of modulus measurement sensitivity to indentation parameters,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 522, 1998, pp. 239–244.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Herrmann K, N.M. Jennett, W. Wegener, J. Meneve, K. Hasche, and R. Seemann, “Progress in determination of the area function of indenters used for nanoindentation,” Thin Solid Films, 377, 2000, pp. 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Enders, P. Grau, and H.M. Hawthorne, “Determination of the real indenter shape for nanoindentation/nanotribology tests by surface metrological and analytical investigations,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 649, 2001, pp. Q3.6.1–Q3.6.6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.N. Bolster, unpublished work.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Bolshakov and G.M. Pharr, “Influences of pileup on the measurement of mechanical properties by load and depth sensing indentation techniques,” J. Mater. Res. 134, 1998, pp. 1049–1058.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.L. Hay, W.C. Oliver, A. Bolshakov, and G.M. Pharr “Using the ratio of loading slope and elastic stiffness to predict pile-up and constraint factor during indentation,” Mat. Res. Proc. Symp. 522, 1998, pp. 101–106.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. X. Randall and C. Julia-Schmutz, “Evolution of contact area and pile-up during the nanoindentation of soft coatings on hard substrates.” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 522, 1998, pp. 21–26.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.W. McElhaney, J.J. Vlassak, and W.D. Nix, “Determination of indenter tip geometry and indentation contact area for depth-sensing indentation experiments,” J. Mater. Res. 135, 1998, pp. 1300–1306.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Li, A. Ghosh, Y.H. Yan, and R.C. Bradt, “The frictional component of the indentation size effect in low load microhardness testing,” J. Mater. Res. 85, 1993, pp. 1028–1032.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Gane, “The direct measurement of the strength of metals on a sub-micrometre scale,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A317, 1970, pp. 367–391.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.J. Bull, T.F. Page, and E.H. Yoffe, “An explanation of the indentation size effects in ceramics,” Phil. Mag. Lett. 596, 1989, pp. 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W.D. Nix and H. Gao, “Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 463, 1998, pp. 411–425.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.F. Archard, “Elastic deformations and the law of friction,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A243, 1957, pp. 190–205.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.A. Greenwood and J.B.P. Williamson, “Contact of nominally flat surfaces,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A295, 1966, pp. 300–319.ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.A. Greenwood and J.H. Tripp, “The contact of two nominally rough surfaces,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 185, 1971, pp. 625–633.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K.L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    D.L. Joslin and W.C. Oliver, “A new method for analyzing data from continuous depth-sensing microindentation tests,” J. Mater. Res. 51, 1990, pp. 123–126.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.S. Field, “Understanding the penetration resistance of modified surface layers,” Surf. Coat. Tech. 36, 1988, pp. 817–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.H. Underwood, “Residual stress measurement using surface displacements around an indentation,” Experimental Mechanics, 30, 1973, pp. 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S.G. Roberts, C.W. Lawrence, Y. Bisrat, and P.D. Warren, “Determination of surface residual stresses in brittle materials by Hertzian indentation: Theory and experiment,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 827, 1999, pp. 1809–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.M. Chaudhri and M.A. Phillips, “Quasi-static cracking of thermally tempered soda-lime glass with spherical and Vickers indenters,” Phil. Mag. A621, 1990, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Chandrasekar and M.M. Chaudhri, “Indentation cracking in soda-lime glass and Ni-Zn ferrite under Knoop and conical indenters and residual stress measurements,” Phil. Mag. A676, 1993, pp. 1187–1218.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    T.Y. Tsui, W.C. Oliver, and G.M. Pharr, “Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation. 1. Experimental studies in an aluminium alloy,” J. Mater. Res. 113, 1996, pp. 752–759.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Bolshakov, W.C. Oliver, and G.M. Pharr, “Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation. 2. Finite element simulations,” J. Mater. Res. 113, 1996, pp. 760–768.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. Taljat and G.M. Pharr, “Measurement of residual stresses by load and depth sensing spherical indentation,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 594, 2000, pp. 519–524.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    F.B. Langitan and B.R. Lawn, “Hertzian fracture experiments on abraded glass surfaces as definitive evidence for an energy balance explanation of Auerbach’s law,” J. App. Phys. 4010, 1969, pp. 4009–4017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2000

Personalised recommendations