Modeling Problems in Conservation Genetics Using Laboratory Animals Richard Frankham
The theory that underlies many management practices and recommendations in conservation genetics is very simplistic. Consequently, it is essential that it be subjected to controlled replicated experimental evaluation.
Such evaluations are impractical in most wildlife species. Consequently, they are best done in laboratory animals and plants.
It is critical that there be an interplay between theory and experimentation in conservation genetics and conservation biology generally.
Studies have begun recently with laboratory animals to evaluate a range of issues in conservation genetics.
It is desirable that more than one laboratory animal model be used, and/or meta-analyses of wildlife data, to establish the generality of conclusions.
A selfing plant laboratory model needs to be developed. Arabidopsis is an obvious candidate for this role.
A wide range of questions in conservation genetics need to be addressed in laboratory species. Several of these are listed.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ballou J, Lacy RC (1995) Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic diversity in pedigreed populations. In: Ballou J, Gilpin M, Foose T. (eds) Population management for survival and recovery: analytical methods and strategies in small population conservation. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 76–111Google Scholar
- Brakefield PM, Saccheri IJ (1994) Guidelines in conservation genetics and the use of the population cage experiments with butterflies to investigate the effects of genetic drift and inbreeding. In Loeschcke V, Tomiuk J, Jain SK (eds) Conservation genetics. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, pp 165–179Google Scholar
- Bulmer MG (1980) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
- Clayton GA, Morris JA, Robertson A (1957) An experimental check on quantitative genetical theory. I. Short-term responses to selection. Journal of Genetics 55:131–151Google Scholar
- Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th ed. Longman, Harlow, UKGoogle Scholar
- Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52:399–433Google Scholar
- Frankham R (1980) Origin of genetic variation in selection lines. In: Robertson A (ed) Selection experiments in laboratory and domestic animals. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK, pp 56–68Google Scholar
- Frankham R (1982) Contributions of Drosophila research to quantitative genetics and animal breeding. Proceeding of the 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 5:43–56Google Scholar
- Frankham R (1983) Origin of genetic variation in selection lines. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second National Breeders’ Roundtable, St. Louis, Missouri, pp 1–18Google Scholar
- Frankham R (1992) Integrating technologies into animal breeding programmes. In: Moore HDM, Holt WV, Mace GM (eds) Biotechnology and the conservation of genetic diversity. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 64. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, pp 207–221Google Scholar
- Frankham R (1995a) Effective population size / adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genetical Research 66:95–107Google Scholar
- Frankham R (1995d) Genetic management of captive populations for reintroduction. In: Serena M (ed) Reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand fauna. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia pp 31–34Google Scholar
- Frankham R, Nurthen RK (1981) Forging links between population and quantitative genetics. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 59:251–263Google Scholar
- Franklin IR (1980) Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 135–140Google Scholar
- Hazel LN, Lush JL (1942) The efficiency of three methods of selection. Journal of Heredity 33:393–399Google Scholar
- Hill WG (1981) Assessment of breeding value in selection programs. Proceeding of the Second Conference of the Australian Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Melbourne, Australia, pp 227–236Google Scholar
- Jimenez JA, Hughes KA, Alaks G, Graham L, Lacy RC (1994) An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitat. Science 216:271–273Google Scholar
- Kimura M, Crow JF (1963) On the maximum avoidance of inbreeding. Genetical Research 4:399–415Google Scholar
- Lande R, Barrowclough GF (1987) Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. In: Soulé ME (ed) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 87–123Google Scholar
- Latter BDH (1964) Selection for a threshold character in Drosophila. I. An analysis of phenotypic variance on the underlying scale. Genetical Research 5:198–210Google Scholar
- Lopez-Fanjul C, Caballero A (1990) The effect of artificial selection on new mutations for a quantitative trait. Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 13:210–218Google Scholar
- Lush JL (1945) Animal breeding plans, 3rd ed. Iowa State College Press, Ames, IAGoogle Scholar
- Mina NS, Sheldon BL, Yoo BH, Frankham R (1991) Heterozygosity at protein loci in inbred and outbred lines of chickens. Poultry Science 70:864–872Google Scholar
- Ralls K, Ballou J (1983) Extinction: lessons from zoos. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas WL (eds) Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, pp 164–184Google Scholar
- Soulé ME (1980) Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 151–169Google Scholar
- Templeton AR, Read B (1983) The elimination of inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke’s Gazelle. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas WL (eds) Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild animal and plant populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, pp 241–261Google Scholar
- Vrijenhoek RC (1994) Genetic diversity and fitness in small populations. In: Loeschcke V, Tomiuk J, Jain SK (eds) Conservation genetics. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, pp 37–53Google Scholar
- Woodworth LM (1996) Population size in captive breeding programs. PhD thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Wright JW, Treadwell M, Nurthen RK, Woodworth LM, Montgomery ME, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (in press) Modelling problems in conservation genetics using Drosophila: purging is ineffective in reducing genetic load. Biodiversity and ConservationGoogle Scholar
- Wright S (1969) Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol 2. The theory of gene frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- Wright S (1977) Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol 3. Experimental results and evolutionary deductions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar