Advertisement

Introduction: Ecosystem Understanding Is a Key to Understanding Cities

  • Charles H. Nilon
  • Alan R. Berkowitz
  • Karen S. Hollweg

Keywords

Urban Resident Urban Forest Urban Ecosystem National Environmental Urban Ecology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AFRO-Charities Inc. 2000. AFRO-Clean Block. AFRO-American Newspapers, Baltimore. http://www.afro.com/culture/cleanblock/cleanblock.htmlGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonnes, M. 1987. Urban ecology applied to the city of Rome. Italia MAB Project 11 Progress. Report N. 3. University of Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  3. Boyden, S., S. Millar, K. Newcombe, and B. O’Neill. 1981. The ecology of a city and its people: the case of Hong Kong. Australian National University Press, Canberra.Google Scholar
  4. Celecia, J. 2000. UNESCO’S Man and the Biosphere Programme and urban ecosystem research: a brief overview of the evolution and challenges of a three-decade international experience. MAB ad hoc working group to explore the application of the biosphere reserve concept to urban areas and their hinterlands. UNESCO, Paris. http://www.unesco.org/mab/urban/jc1doc.pdfGoogle Scholar
  5. Costanza, R., L. Wainger, C. Folke, and K.G. Mäler. 1993. Modeling complex economic systems: toward an evolutionary, dynamic understanding of people and nature. Bio Science 43:545–555.Google Scholar
  6. Costanza, R., and J. Greer. 1995. The Chesapeake Bay and its watershed: a model for sustainable ecosystem management? Pages 169–213 in H.L. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, and S.S. Light, eds. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Cronon, W. 1991. Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great west. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, I. 1983. The urban environment. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  9. Greenwood, E.F., ed. 1999. Ecology and landscape development: a history of the Mersey Basin. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool.Google Scholar
  10. Grove, J.M., and W.R. Burch, Jr. 1997. A social ecology approach and applications of urban ecosystem and landscape analyses: a case study of Baltimore, Maryland. Urban Ecosystems 1:259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Handley, J.F., E.J. Griffiths, S.L. Hill, and J.M. Howe. 1998. Land restoration using an ecologically informed and participative approach. Pages 171–185 in H.R. Fox, H.M. Moore, and A.D. McIntosh, eds. Land reclamation: achieving sustainable benefits. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison, C.M., and J. Burgess. 1994. Social constructions of nature: a case study of conflicts over the development of Rainham Marshes. Transactions Institute of British Geographers 19:291–310.Google Scholar
  13. Hurley, A. 1997. Floods, rats, and toxic waste: allocating environmental hazards since World War II. Pages 242–261 in A. Hurley, ed. Common fields: an environmental history of St. Louis. Missouri Historical Society Press, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  14. Kellert, S.R. 1976. Perceptions of animals in American society. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 41:533–545.Google Scholar
  15. Knox, P. L. 1991. The restless urban landscape: economic and socio-cultural change and the transformation of Washington, DC. Annals Association of American Geographers 81:181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knox, P.L. 1994. Urbanization: an introduction to urban geography. Prentice Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Luniak, M., and B. Pisarski. 1994. State of research into the fauna of Warsaw (up to 1990). Memorabilia Zoologica 49:155–165.Google Scholar
  18. McDonnell, M.J., S.T.A. Pickett, P. Groffman, P. Bohlen, R.V. Pouyat, W.C. Zipperer, R.W. Parmelee, M.M. Carreiro, and K. Medley. 1997. Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1:21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDonnell, M.J., and S.T.A. Pickett. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McDonnell, M.J., and S.T.A. Pickett, eds. 1993. Humans as components of ecosystems: the ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  21. MacFarlane, R., D. Fuller, and M. Jeffries. 2000. Outsiders in the urban landscape? An analysis of ethnic minority landscapes. In J. Benson and M. Roe, eds. Urban lifestyles: spaces, places, people. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  22. National Environmental Education and Training Foundation. 1998. The seventh annual national report card on environmental attitudes, knowledge, and behavior. National Environmental Education and Training Foundation. Roper Starch Worldwide, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. National Environmental Education and Training Foundation. 1999. Environmental readiness for the 21st century. The eighth annual national report card on environmental attitudes, knowledge, and behavior. National Environmental Education and Training Foundation. Roper Starch Worldwide, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Nilon, C.H., and R.C. Pais. 1997. Terrestrial vertebrates in urban ecosystems: Developing hypotheses for the Gwynns Falls watershed in Baltimore, Maryland. Urban Ecosystems 1:247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nowak, D.J. 1994. Urban forest structure: the state of Chicago’s urban forest. Pages 140–164 in E.G. McPherson, D.J. Nowak, and R.A. Rowntree, eds. Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: Results of the Chicago urban forest climate project. Volume Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186. USDA Forest Service, Radnor, PA.Google Scholar
  26. Numata, M., ed. 1973. Fundamental studies in the characteristics of urban ecosystems. Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.Google Scholar
  27. Office of Management and Budget. 2000. Standards for defining metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. Federal Register 65(249):82228–82238.Google Scholar
  28. Pickett, S.T.A., W.R. Burch, Jr., S.E. Dalton, T.W. Foresman, J.M. Grove, and R.A. Rowntree. 1997. A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems 1:185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reardon, K.M. 1998. Enhancing the capacity of community-based organizations in East St. Louis. Journal of Planning Education and Research 17(4):323–333.Google Scholar
  30. Spirn, A.W. 1984. The granite garden. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Spirn, A.W. 1998. The language of landscape. Yale, New Haven.Google Scholar
  32. Statistics South Africa. 1998. The people of South Africa: population census 1996, the count and how it was done. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  33. Sukopp, H. 1990. Urban ecology and its application in Europe. Pages 1–22 in H. Sukopp, S. Hejny, and I. Kowarik, eds. Urban ecology: plants and plant communities in urban environments. SPB Academic Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, A. 2000. The mosquito as urban problem. Baltimore Afro-American 108(47):A10.Google Scholar
  35. Wagoner, P.E., and J.D. Ovington. 1962. Proceedings of the Lockwood conference on the suburban forest and ecology. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 652.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles H. Nilon
  • Alan R. Berkowitz
  • Karen S. Hollweg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations