Advertisement

Perception of Three-Dimensional Space: How Do We Use Information Derived from One or Both Eyes to Perceive the Spatial Layout of Our Surroundings?

Keywords

Visual Direction Binocular Vision Sensory Fusion Binocular Rivalry Depth Plane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Reading List

  1. Belsunce, S. de, and Sireteanu, R. 1991. The time course of interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 32:2645–2652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blake, R., and Wilson, H.R. 1991. Neural models of stereoscopic vision. Trends Neurosci. 14:445–452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boothe, R.G., and Brown, R.J. 1996. What happens to binocularity in primate strabismus? Eye 10:199–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fleet, D.J., Wagner, H., and Heeger, D.J. 1996. Neural encoding of binocular disparity: Energy models, position shifts and phase shifts. Vision Res. 36:1839–1857.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gillam, B., and Lawergren, B. 1983. The induced effect, vertical disparity, and stereoscopic theory. Percept. Psychophys. 34:121–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Harwerth, R.S., Smith E.L. III, and Siderov, J. 1995. Behavioral studies of local stereopsis and disparity vergence in monkeys. Vision Res. 35:1755–1770.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hering, E. 1977. The Theory of Binocular Vision, eds. B. Bridgeman and L. Stark. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T.N. 1970. Stereoscopic vision in macaque monkey. Nature 225:41–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu, L., Stevenson, S.B., and Schor, C.B. 1994. Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence. Nature 367:66–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Marr, D., and Poggio, T. 1976. Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. Science 194:283–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mayhew, J., and Frisby, J. 1981. Psychophysical and computational studies towards a theory of human stereopsis. Artif. Intelligence 17:349–385.Google Scholar
  12. Ogle, K.N. 1950. Researches in Binocular Vision. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  13. Ohzawa, I., DeAngelis, G.C., and Freeman, R.D. 1997. The neural coding of stereoscopic depth. Neuroreport 8:iii–xii.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Poggio, G.F., Gonzalez, F., and Krause, F. 1988. Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: Binocular correlation and disparity selectivity. J. Neurosci. 8:4531–4550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Poggio, G.F., and Poggio, T. 1984. The analysis of stereopsis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 7:379–412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Qian, N. 1997. Binocular disparity and the perception of depth. Neuron 18:359–368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Regan, D. 1991. Binocular Vision, Vol. 9, Vision and Visual Dysfunction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  18. Shimojo, S., and Nakayama, K. 1990. Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 30:69–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shipley, T., and Rawlings, S.C. 1970. The nonius horopter: I. History and theory. Vision Res. 10:1225–1262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sireteanu, R., and Fronius, M. 1989. Different patterns of retinal correspondence in the central and peripheral visual field of strabismics. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 30:2023–2033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tyler, C.W. 1983. Sensory processing of binocular disparity. In Vergence Eye Movements: Basic and Clinical Aspects, eds. C.M. Schor and K.J. Ciuffreda, pp. 199–295. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  22. Tyler, C.W., and Chang, J.-J. 1977. Visual echoes: The perception of repetition in quasi-random patterns. Vision Res. 17:109–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wheatstone, C. 1838. Contributions to the physiology of vision: Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 128:371–394.Google Scholar
  24. Wheatstone, C. 1852. Contributions to the physiology of vision: Part the second. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 142:1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2002

Personalised recommendations